Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News 
Thread started 06 Aug 2012 (Monday) 23:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Nikon D800E v.s Hasselblad H4D40: the end of medium format superiority

 
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 56
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 12, 2012 17:08 |  #31

Tareq wrote in post #14849407 (external link)
Well, again of those pointless comparisons blogs, i just commented on Getdpi about that comparison thread, I had H3DII-39 and tested it against 1Ds MarkIII, i loved Hassy a lot over 35mm DSLr, then got H4D-60, i use Canon only for sports and few outdoor shots.

It's getting to the point where Digi MF is loosing it's niche. Why do you think Hassy dropped their prices?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,736 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Aug 13, 2012 12:52 |  #32

jdizzle wrote in post #14849520 (external link)
It's getting to the point where Digi MF is loosing it's niche. Why do you think Hassy dropped their prices?

Loosing its niche is a healthy thing, even it happens between Canon and Nikon and Sony and so on.

About Hassy dropping prices, well, i don't think it is only because of 35mm DSLR, but also Phase One and Leaf have their strong competition.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,612 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 6553
Joined Aug 2010
Location: West Point, Georgia
     
Aug 13, 2012 14:01 |  #33

That other MF competition has been there for years right? Yet the price drop seemed to coincide with the release of the D800/E. I think that's why it's assumed that the D800/E helped trigger the price drop.

But, I guess the question is: has the D800/E started creating any sort of serious migration from MF?


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony α7R II | CV 12mm, Loxia 21mm, Loxia 35mm, FE 35mm F1.4, Batis 85mm, Batis 135mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjyoder
Goldmember
Avatar
1,664 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central Ohio
     
Aug 13, 2012 16:38 |  #34

David Arbogast wrote in post #14853082 (external link)
But, I guess the question is: has the D800/E started creating any sort of serious migration from MF?

I'd love to see stats on that, though I'm sure they'll be hard to come by. ;)

My guess: Most of the guys using MF have the means to keep using MF, especially with some price drops. From what I've seen, the D800/E is still a step (more?) behind a good MF back. The people using MF are looking to eke out that last little bit of imaging quality. If they have the means to stay with MF, and MF gives better results, why would they choose something of lesser quality for their work? (Though, the D800/E could definitely be a decent backup/on-location camera for that crowd).


Ben

500px (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Aug 13, 2012 17:34 |  #35

Tareq wrote in post #14852824 (external link)
Loosing its niche is a healthy thing, even it happens between Canon and Nikon and Sony and so on.

About Hassy dropping prices, well, i don't think it is only because of 35mm DSLR, but also Phase One and Leaf have their strong competition.



The entry leaf Aptus is $8000.... If you already have a body... It's really hard to compete against that.


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,805 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 395
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Aug 13, 2012 18:32 |  #36

Don't forget, a lot of the technologies which have made the D800E competitive with some MF bodies would also benefit MF if they were transferred to MF digital backs. A full-frame 645 (56x42mm) CMOS sensor could very well have 15-16 stops of DR (using DXOMark's reference ranges), high ISO capability, 100-120MP and fully-functional live view. Same goes with a panoramic 24x72mm CMOS sensor.

But, with the D800E being the new benchmark, and future 35mm-format sensors improving on it, these benefits will likely only be relevant to 1% of photographers, and affordable to just 1% of these. MF manufacturers would do well to concentrate on the $10k-$15k end of the market, rather than $40k digital backs, and provide a greater variety of lenses, particularly at the wider end. After all, if Hartblei can stick a Canon TS-E 17L onto a MF digital back, while still retaining tilt/shift capabilities, then so can Zeiss, Schneider or Rodenstock. At the moment, you can shoot wider on a single 35mm frame than on a single MF frame, which is a big disincentive to go MF. But, with a proliferation of $10-$15k CMOS bodies and better UWA capability, a lot of people who would otherwise have bought a 35mm system would be tempted to go for MF instead. These are people who shoot primarily at the UWA-to-medium-telephoto range, who don't shoot action and need the flexibility of camera and lens movements - something that MF does much better than 35mm formats.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 56
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 13, 2012 20:30 |  #37

Shadowblade wrote in post #14854240 (external link)
Don't forget, a lot of the technologies which have made the D800E competitive with some MF bodies would also benefit MF if they were transferred to MF digital backs. A full-frame 645 (56x42mm) CMOS sensor could very well have 15-16 stops of DR (using DXOMark's reference ranges), high ISO capability, 100-120MP and fully-functional live view. Same goes with a panoramic 24x72mm CMOS sensor.

But, with the D800E being the new benchmark, and future 35mm-format sensors improving on it, these benefits will likely only be relevant to 1% of photographers, and affordable to just 1% of these. MF manufacturers would do well to concentrate on the $10k-$15k end of the market, rather than $40k digital backs, and provide a greater variety of lenses, particularly at the wider end. After all, if Hartblei can stick a Canon TS-E 17L onto a MF digital back, while still retaining tilt/shift capabilities, then so can Zeiss, Schneider or Rodenstock. At the moment, you can shoot wider on a single 35mm frame than on a single MF frame, which is a big disincentive to go MF. But, with a proliferation of $10-$15k CMOS bodies and better UWA capability, a lot of people who would otherwise have bought a 35mm system would be tempted to go for MF instead. These are people who shoot primarily at the UWA-to-medium-telephoto range, who don't shoot action and need the flexibility of camera and lens movements - something that MF does much better than 35mm formats.

Until that day comes where I can have at least 40 MP at a reasonable price( not including Pentax's 645D), I'll stick to 35mm for now.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 56
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 13, 2012 20:30 |  #38

pyrojim wrote in post #14853993 (external link)
The entry leaf Aptus is $8000.... If you already have a body... It's really hard to compete against that.

How many MPs is the $8k back?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,234 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Aug 13, 2012 21:31 |  #39

danpass wrote in post #14842759 (external link)
I only read the first part but here is an off-the-cuff MF shot, simple auto tune in LR, full shot then 100% light eye, then 100% dark eye to show shadows and this was just a Phase One P45 (which I believe are CCD sensors):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

I had a Hassy V 120 macro mounted on a d800e and tried to get a shot of the owner but the light was really hot (outdoor high noon) and I couldn't get the right shutter speed at f/11 hand held. I need to setup a session with flash and a similar face in order to produce a reasonable comparison. I also shot too close. Magnification matters as well. I was between 1:2 and 1:3. When I get the opportunity I will post the results.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Aug 13, 2012 22:19 |  #40

jdizzle wrote in post #14854681 (external link)
How many MPs is the $8k back?

22 megapixels on a 36x48mm chip.

Remember megapixel count is only a small part of the story


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,736 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Aug 14, 2012 06:12 |  #41

Funny that Leaf has also that back of 33mp [Aptus II 33] and 40mp [Aptus II 40] under same price = $14,990, and Leaf Credo 40mp = $19,495
Hasselblad H4D-31 = $11,995


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Aug 14, 2012 06:23 |  #42

Either way you slice it, it's quite obvious that the MF "slice of the pie" will be getting smaller and smaller...
It's already a niche among niches, expect it to become even more "nichy" ;)


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maverique
Senior Member
Avatar
880 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Portugal
     
Aug 14, 2012 16:54 |  #43

News just in: medium format still kicks small format's ass, no matter if it's Nikon, Canon, Canikon...


My website (external link) | My facebook (external link) | My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 56
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Aug 14, 2012 17:03 |  #44

Maverique wrote in post #14858686 (external link)
News just in: medium format still kicks small format's ass, no matter if it's Nikon, Canon, Canikon...

We all know that. Unless we're printing large billboards, it's impractical to most. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Aug 14, 2012 17:11 |  #45

jdizzle wrote in post #14858735 (external link)
We all know that. Unless we're printing large billboards, it's impractical to most. ;)

medium format DIGITAL is impractical for most(thread context)

Film on the other hand....is wicked fun! 6x7 negatives are just plain sexy! (out of thread context)

The look and feel of 6x7 negatives is pretty special. Im really glad I picked up a medium format camera... also makes my 1Ds feel light


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,229 views & 0 likes for this thread
Nikon D800E v.s Hasselblad H4D40: the end of medium format superiority
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is henkbriek
650 guests, 261 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.