Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News
Thread started 06 Aug 2012 (Monday) 23:31
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Nikon D800E v.s Hasselblad H4D40: the end of medium format superiority

 
jdizzle
Darth Noink
jdizzle's Avatar
69,419 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Harvesting Nano crystals
Aug 12, 2012 17:08 |  #31

Tareq wrote in post #14849407external link
Well, again of those pointless comparisons blogs, i just commented on Getdpi about that comparison thread, I had H3DII-39 and tested it against 1Ds MarkIII, i loved Hassy a lot over 35mm DSLr, then got H4D-60, i use Canon only for sports and few outdoor shots.

It's getting to the point where Digi MF is loosing it's niche. Why do you think Hassy dropped their prices?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Tareq's Avatar
17,176 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Ajman - UAE
Aug 13, 2012 12:52 |  #32

jdizzle wrote in post #14849520external link
It's getting to the point where Digi MF is loosing it's niche. Why do you think Hassy dropped their prices?

Loosing its niche is a healthy thing, even it happens between Canon and Nikon and Sony and so on.

About Hassy dropping prices, well, i don't think it is only because of 35mm DSLR, but also Phase One and Leaf have their strong competition.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/external link
Gear List
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
West Point, Georgia
Aug 13, 2012 14:01 |  #33

That other MF competition has been there for years right? Yet the price drop seemed to coincide with the release of the D800/E. I think that's why it's assumed that the D800/E helped trigger the price drop.

But, I guess the question is: has the D800/E started creating any sort of serious migration from MF?


David | Flickr (external link)
Cameras: Canon 5DS R, Sony a7R II
Canon Lenses: TS-E 24L II, 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 40 f/2.8, 70-200 f/4L IS
Zeiss Lenses (ZE): Otus 1.4/55, Apo Sonnar 2/135

LOG IN TO REPLY
bjyoder
Goldmember
bjyoder's Avatar
1,664 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Central Ohio
Aug 13, 2012 16:38 |  #34

David Arbogast wrote in post #14853082external link
But, I guess the question is: has the D800/E started creating any sort of serious migration from MF?

I'd love to see stats on that, though I'm sure they'll be hard to come by. ;)

My guess: Most of the guys using MF have the means to keep using MF, especially with some price drops. From what I've seen, the D800/E is still a step (more?) behind a good MF back. The people using MF are looking to eke out that last little bit of imaging quality. If they have the means to stay with MF, and MF gives better results, why would they choose something of lesser quality for their work? (Though, the D800/E could definitely be a decent backup/on-location camera for that crowd).


Ben

500pxexternal link | Websiteexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Joined Jan 2010
San Jose, CA
Aug 13, 2012 17:34 |  #35

Tareq wrote in post #14852824external link
Loosing its niche is a healthy thing, even it happens between Canon and Nikon and Sony and so on.

About Hassy dropping prices, well, i don't think it is only because of 35mm DSLR, but also Phase One and Leaf have their strong competition.



The entry leaf Aptus is $8000.... If you already have a body... It's really hard to compete against that.


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
Melbourne, Australia
Aug 13, 2012 18:32 |  #36

Don't forget, a lot of the technologies which have made the D800E competitive with some MF bodies would also benefit MF if they were transferred to MF digital backs. A full-frame 645 (56x42mm) CMOS sensor could very well have 15-16 stops of DR (using DXOMark's reference ranges), high ISO capability, 100-120MP and fully-functional live view. Same goes with a panoramic 24x72mm CMOS sensor.

But, with the D800E being the new benchmark, and future 35mm-format sensors improving on it, these benefits will likely only be relevant to 1% of photographers, and affordable to just 1% of these. MF manufacturers would do well to concentrate on the $10k-$15k end of the market, rather than $40k digital backs, and provide a greater variety of lenses, particularly at the wider end. After all, if Hartblei can stick a Canon TS-E 17L onto a MF digital back, while still retaining tilt/shift capabilities, then so can Zeiss, Schneider or Rodenstock. At the moment, you can shoot wider on a single 35mm frame than on a single MF frame, which is a big disincentive to go MF. But, with a proliferation of $10-$15k CMOS bodies and better UWA capability, a lot of people who would otherwise have bought a 35mm system would be tempted to go for MF instead. These are people who shoot primarily at the UWA-to-medium-telephoto range, who don't shoot action and need the flexibility of camera and lens movements - something that MF does much better than 35mm formats.




LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
jdizzle's Avatar
69,419 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Harvesting Nano crystals
Aug 13, 2012 20:30 |  #37

Shadowblade wrote in post #14854240external link
Don't forget, a lot of the technologies which have made the D800E competitive with some MF bodies would also benefit MF if they were transferred to MF digital backs. A full-frame 645 (56x42mm) CMOS sensor could very well have 15-16 stops of DR (using DXOMark's reference ranges), high ISO capability, 100-120MP and fully-functional live view. Same goes with a panoramic 24x72mm CMOS sensor.

But, with the D800E being the new benchmark, and future 35mm-format sensors improving on it, these benefits will likely only be relevant to 1% of photographers, and affordable to just 1% of these. MF manufacturers would do well to concentrate on the $10k-$15k end of the market, rather than $40k digital backs, and provide a greater variety of lenses, particularly at the wider end. After all, if Hartblei can stick a Canon TS-E 17L onto a MF digital back, while still retaining tilt/shift capabilities, then so can Zeiss, Schneider or Rodenstock. At the moment, you can shoot wider on a single 35mm frame than on a single MF frame, which is a big disincentive to go MF. But, with a proliferation of $10-$15k CMOS bodies and better UWA capability, a lot of people who would otherwise have bought a 35mm system would be tempted to go for MF instead. These are people who shoot primarily at the UWA-to-medium-telephoto range, who don't shoot action and need the flexibility of camera and lens movements - something that MF does much better than 35mm formats.

Until that day comes where I can have at least 40 MP at a reasonable price( not including Pentax's 645D), I'll stick to 35mm for now.




LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
jdizzle's Avatar
69,419 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Harvesting Nano crystals
Aug 13, 2012 20:30 |  #38

pyrojim wrote in post #14853993external link
The entry leaf Aptus is $8000.... If you already have a body... It's really hard to compete against that.

How many MPs is the $8k back?




LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,234 posts
Joined Jul 2009
West Marin
Aug 13, 2012 21:31 |  #39

danpass wrote in post #14842759 (external link)
I only read the first part but here is an off-the-cuff MF shot, simple auto tune in LR, full shot then 100% light eye, then 100% dark eye to show shadows and this was just a Phase One P45 (which I believe are CCD sensors):

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.danpassaro.​com/img/s1/v49/p408189​540-4.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

I had a Hassy V 120 macro mounted on a d800e and tried to get a shot of the owner but the light was really hot (outdoor high noon) and I couldn't get the right shutter speed at f/11 hand held. I need to setup a session with flash and a similar face in order to produce a reasonable comparison. I also shot too close. Magnification matters as well. I was between 1:2 and 1:3. When I get the opportunity I will post the results.




LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Joined Jan 2010
San Jose, CA
Aug 13, 2012 22:19 |  #40

jdizzle wrote in post #14854681external link
How many MPs is the $8k back?

22 megapixels on a 36x48mm chip.

Remember megapixel count is only a small part of the story


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Tareq's Avatar
17,176 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Ajman - UAE
Aug 14, 2012 06:12 |  #41

Funny that Leaf has also that back of 33mp [Aptus II 33] and 40mp [Aptus II 40] under same price = $14,990, and Leaf Credo 40mp = $19,495
Hasselblad H4D-31 = $11,995


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/external link
Gear List
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
Goldmember
andrikos's Avatar
1,904 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Stuttgart, Germany
Aug 14, 2012 06:23 |  #42

Either way you slice it, it's quite obvious that the MF "slice of the pie" will be getting smaller and smaller...
It's already a niche among niches, expect it to become even more "nichy" ;)


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Maverique
Senior Member
Maverique's Avatar
868 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Portugal
Aug 14, 2012 16:54 |  #43

News just in: medium format still kicks small format's ass, no matter if it's Nikon, Canon, Canikon...


My websiteexternal link | My facebookexternal link | My flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
jdizzle's Avatar
69,419 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Harvesting Nano crystals
Aug 14, 2012 17:03 |  #44

Maverique wrote in post #14858686external link
News just in: medium format still kicks small format's ass, no matter if it's Nikon, Canon, Canikon...

We all know that. Unless we're printing large billboards, it's impractical to most. ;)




LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Joined Jan 2010
San Jose, CA
Aug 14, 2012 17:11 |  #45

jdizzle wrote in post #14858735external link
We all know that. Unless we're printing large billboards, it's impractical to most. ;)

medium format DIGITAL is impractical for most(thread context)

Film on the other hand....is wicked fun! 6x7 negatives are just plain sexy! (out of thread context)

The look and feel of 6x7 negatives is pretty special. Im really glad I picked up a medium format camera... also makes my 1Ds feel light


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6,652 views & 0 likes for this thread
Nikon D800E v.s Hasselblad H4D40: the end of medium format superiority
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00281 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Time-machine
613 guests, 395 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015