Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 21 Jun 2012 (Thursday) 17:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Shooting the moon

 
PUREVIL
Senior Member
Avatar
752 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Minot ND / Las Vegas NV
     
Sep 28, 2012 17:23 |  #106

That is insane! Why use a pentax? just curious?


1DX |1Ds MKIII | 7D | 40D | 10-22mm f/3.5 | 50mm f/1.2L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm macro f/2.8 | 17-55mm f/2.8 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L | (3) 580EXII | Lots Of Other Canon Gear And Accessories.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Viffer
Member
Avatar
171 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 28, 2012 18:01 |  #107

PUREVIL wrote in post #15055530 (external link)
That is insane! Why use a pentax? just curious?

5.5x Crop factor gives you 13200mm f/16 on the pentax Q. (600 x 2 x 2 x 5.5)
Still, diffraction sets in at 2.8 on the Q. I was Just messing about with this setup to see if I could get anything usable. Will try with a stepper motor see if I can get better detail.
Below the image I took with my 1Dx (same rig) previous to attaching the Q.

IMAGE: http://www.igdimages.co.uk/Forums/BN5P5850.jpg
Please note: exif reports only one EF extender and aperture of f/8 this is incorrect.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon11385
Member
Avatar
131 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: NY
     
Sep 28, 2012 21:10 |  #108

i too shot the moon acouple of times on a 55-250 i only post the pics online and for personal viewing so i just cropped my photo to put the moon in the whole picture and i have to say detail is pretty good.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

Im better behind the lens then in front of it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skul
Member
92 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2011
Location: SE Texas
     
Sep 28, 2012 21:16 |  #109

I'm rather impressed he pulled out the cobra at Aristarchus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MolonLabe
Member
37 posts
Joined Sep 2012
     
Sep 29, 2012 21:30 |  #110

Canon11385 wrote in post #15056191 (external link)
i too shot the moon acouple of times on a 55-250 i only post the pics online and for personal viewing so i just cropped my photo to put the moon in the whole picture and i have to say detail is pretty good.

I went outside tonight with my Canon T4i and the 55-250 f/3.5-5.6 IS and got these:

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i800.photobucke​t.com …metheus77777/IM​G_3001.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

I used MSpaint to crop it, no other editing done.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i800.photobucke​t.com …metheus77777/IM​G_3016.jpg (external link)

SOOC, no crop or anything. I had to put it in the bottom of the frame because of the neighbors houses and street lights ect. ect.

For such an inexpensive lens, I'm pretty pleased. I'm sill really new and tonight is my first time ever taking a usable picture of the moon and the first time using a DSLR to try it.

Canon T4i, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 OS, Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM Lens. 430exII speedlite. Canon G11 PnS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PUREVIL
Senior Member
Avatar
752 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Minot ND / Las Vegas NV
     
Sep 29, 2012 22:30 |  #111

man i suck at shooting the moon... i tired some previous suggestions and i still cant get a crisp image like you guys. I'll try again tonight after work.


1DX |1Ds MKIII | 7D | 40D | 10-22mm f/3.5 | 50mm f/1.2L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm macro f/2.8 | 17-55mm f/2.8 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L | (3) 580EXII | Lots Of Other Canon Gear And Accessories.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I never knew that!
Avatar
6,242 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 982
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
     
Sep 30, 2012 07:48 as a reply to  @ PUREVIL's post |  #112

Took these photos last night.

Canon 60D Sigma 150-500 @500 1/500s f/8 ISO 200

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8038/8039068860_223e8b0e84.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/inspeqtor/80390​68860/  (external link)
8X8 Crop 70% Full Moon (external link) by inspeqtor (external link), on Flickr

Canon 60D Sigma 150-500 @500 with Kenko 1.4TC 1/640s f/8 ISO 400

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

8x8 Crop 60% Kenko 1-4 TC Full Moon (external link) by inspeqtor (external link), on Flickr

Charles
Canon EOS 60D Gripped * Canon EOS XSi * Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Swinger
Member
Avatar
101 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Toronto, on
     
Oct 04, 2012 07:25 |  #113

You know ..... it's nice to capture the moon with shorter length lenses just to say "Look what I shot last night", but lets face it - it does not compare to the detail in the picture Bruce (noisejammer) posted on the first page. Well done sir.

noisejammer wrote in post #14613971 (external link)
I got this with a 40D on a 12"f/6.3 scope... focal length was about 2000 mm.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/noisejammer/7​301038074/  (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
noisejammer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto ON
     
Oct 04, 2012 20:59 |  #114

Swinger wrote in post #15078300 (external link)
You know ..... it's nice to capture the moon with shorter length lenses just to say "Look what I shot last night", but lets face it - it does not compare to the detail in the picture Bruce (noisejammer) posted on the first page. Well done sir.

Thanks, Swinger - in truth this was something of a surprise but if you have access to a large scope, it becomes relatively easy. The tricks are always the same, use live view to focus, ETTR, use a tripod, keep the exposure short enough and use mirror lock up.


Several cameras and more glass than I will admit to.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
noisejammer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto ON
     
Oct 04, 2012 21:09 |  #115

ejenner wrote in post #14949036 (external link)
Hmm, I tried photographing the moon a couple of years ago (Dec 21st, 2010) and it ended up looking red. I also needed ISO3200 and 1s on my T1i at f8 for the last shot and they ended up not looking very crisp at all.

Maybe I left my UV filter on? I should try it again sometime, maybe take off the filter and shoot when the earths shadow isn't in the way.

Actually, I think your image is QUITE FINE! If memory serves, there was a total lunar eclipse (TLE) that night. Toronto was clouded out so we missed it.

TLE's are a special case. First off, the moon must be within an hour or so of being completely full so the moon won't have any visible shadows and contrast must be low. Secondly, the moon is inside the earth's shadow so the moon can only be illuminated by light that is refracted and scattered by the earth's atmosphere. This light varies from light yellow to red/brown in colour and can be very faint compared with sunlight.

FWIW, dark / muddy TLE images are actually quite sought after by astrophotographers. They give us some insight into the amount of atmospheric particulates.

Edit... I re-read and got the gag. Damn :)


Several cameras and more glass than I will admit to.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dgiglio3087
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2012
Location: Slidell,LA
     
Jan 16, 2013 10:42 |  #116

Great photos everyone. I love how no two pictures look alike. Its almost as though its not the same moon lol.

Heres a more recent moon photo i took with my canon t3 with 55-250mm lens

IMAGE: http://www.gigliosgallery.com/Nature/The-Moon/i-JnVZzGS/0/L/8230584051_25202dbaa9_o%281%29-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.gigliosgall​ery.com …672303&k=JnVZzG​S&lb=1&s=A  (external link)

I should also point out isnt it amazing to watch how fast the moon can travel out of frame? at first i thought my tripod was loose, then i realized it was the moon moving! lol

<---Daniel'sFlickr (external link)
Giglio's Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dgiglio3087
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2012
Location: Slidell,LA
     
Jan 16, 2013 11:27 |  #117

Viffer wrote in post #15055374 (external link)
The rig Pentax Q + Canon EF 600mm MKII + staked EF extender MKIII & MKII.
Total equivalent focal length 13200mm f/16
Manual focus was a nightmare and so the image when viewed at 100% is way OOF
Image is full frame no crop just resize.

The monster rig
QUOTED IMAGE

The resulting Image.
QUOTED IMAGE

With practice I am hopping to master this rig and improve image IQ. For now and considering the amount of shaking involved when focusing (EF 600mm IS does not work with the pentax), I am relatively happy with this.

wow thats a crazy setup there lol
That lens is easily 10x the the size of the camera.. Nice shot!


<---Daniel'sFlickr (external link)
Giglio's Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawi_200
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Everett, WA
     
Jan 16, 2013 14:12 |  #118

Viffer wrote in post #15055374 (external link)
The rig Pentax Q + Canon EF 600mm MKII + staked EF extender MKIII & MKII.
Total equivalent focal length 13200mm f/16
Manual focus was a nightmare and so the image when viewed at 100% is way OOF
Image is full frame no crop just resize.

The monster rig

The resulting Image.


With practice I am hopping to master this rig and improve image IQ. For now and considering the amount of shaking involved when focusing (EF 600mm IS does not work with the pentax), I am relatively happy with this.

You can try using a second tripod or monopod on the camera body. That will make it so the body doesn't move around as much, and makes focusing easier.


5D4 or 6D2..... Waiting to find out which I buy | 8-15L |24-70mm f/4L IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tickerguy
Senior Member
595 posts
Joined Dec 2012
     
Jan 16, 2013 14:13 |  #119

Try Registax. ;)


Canon 7D & 5d3, EF-S 15-85, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4 IS, 100mm Macro/L, EF 50 f/1.4 and more

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littleoldman
Member
Avatar
201 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 16, 2013 16:18 |  #120

nice shot




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

29,769 views & 0 likes for this thread
Shooting the moon
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nidge
662 guests, 416 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.