Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 21 Jun 2012 (Thursday) 17:03
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Shooting the moon

 
PUREVIL
Senior Member
PUREVIL's Avatar
752 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Minot ND / Las Vegas NV
Sep 28, 2012 17:23 |  #106

That is insane! Why use a pentax? just curious?


1DX |1Ds MKIII | 7D | 40D | 10-22mm f/3.5 | 50mm f/1.2L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm macro f/2.8 | 17-55mm f/2.8 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L | (3) 580EXII | Lots Of Other Canon Gear And Accessories.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Viffer
Member
Viffer's Avatar
171 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Sep 28, 2012 18:01 |  #107

PUREVIL wrote in post #15055530 (external link)
That is insane! Why use a pentax? just curious?

5.5x Crop factor gives you 13200mm f/16 on the pentax Q. (600 x 2 x 2 x 5.5)
Still, diffraction sets in at 2.8 on the Q. I was Just messing about with this setup to see if I could get anything usable. Will try with a stepper motor see if I can get better detail.
Below the image I took with my 1Dx (same rig) previous to attaching the Q.

IMAGE: http://www.igdimages.co.uk/Forums/BN5P5850.jpg
Please note: exif reports only one EF extender and aperture of f/8 this is incorrect.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon11385
Member
Canon11385's Avatar
130 posts
Joined Oct 2011
NY
Sep 28, 2012 21:10 |  #108

i too shot the moon acouple of times on a 55-250 i only post the pics online and for personal viewing so i just cropped my photo to put the moon in the whole picture and i have to say detail is pretty good.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://tragusaphotos.z​enfolio.com/img/s3/v42​/p674140291-3.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://tragusaphotos.z​enfolio.com/img/s3/v41​/p958084078-3.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

Canon T2i, 18-55 f/3.5, 55-250 f/4, 50 f/1.8, 60 f/2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
Skul
Member
92 posts
Joined Oct 2011
SE Texas
Sep 28, 2012 21:16 |  #109

I'm rather impressed he pulled out the cobra at Aristarchus.




LOG IN TO REPLY
MolonLabe
Member
37 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Sep 29, 2012 21:30 |  #110

Canon11385 wrote in post #15056191 (external link)
i too shot the moon acouple of times on a 55-250 i only post the pics online and for personal viewing so i just cropped my photo to put the moon in the whole picture and i have to say detail is pretty good.

I went outside tonight with my Canon T4i and the 55-250 f/3.5-5.6 IS and got these:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i800.photobucke​t.com ...metheus77777/IMG_30​01.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

I used MSpaint to crop it, no other editing done.

IMAGE: http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy281/prometheus77777/IMG_3016.jpg
SOOC, no crop or anything. I had to put it in the bottom of the frame because of the neighbors houses and street lights ect. ect.

For such an inexpensive lens, I'm pretty pleased. I'm sill really new and tonight is my first time ever taking a usable picture of the moon and the first time using a DSLR to try it.

Canon T4i, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 OS, Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S IS STM Lens. 430exII speedlite. Canon G11 PnS.

LOG IN TO REPLY
PUREVIL
Senior Member
PUREVIL's Avatar
752 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Minot ND / Las Vegas NV
Sep 29, 2012 22:30 |  #111

man i suck at shooting the moon... i tired some previous suggestions and i still cant get a crisp image like you guys. I'll try again tonight after work.


1DX |1Ds MKIII | 7D | 40D | 10-22mm f/3.5 | 50mm f/1.2L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm macro f/2.8 | 17-55mm f/2.8 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L | (3) 580EXII | Lots Of Other Canon Gear And Accessories.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
"More unique"? Really?
Inspeqtor's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Elkhart, Indiana
Sep 30, 2012 07:48 as a reply to PUREVIL's post |  #112

Took these photos last night.

Canon 60D Sigma 150-500 @500 1/500s f/8 ISO 200

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8038/8039068860_223e8b0e84.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/inspeqtor/80390​68860/] (external link)
8X8 Crop 70% Full Moon (external link) by inspeqtor (external link), on Flickr

Canon 60D Sigma 150-500 @500 with Kenko 1.4TC 1/640s f/8 ISO 400

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm9.staticfli​ckr.com ...8039069928_9e7c5995​9c.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

8x8 Crop 60% Kenko 1-4 TC Full Moon (external link) by inspeqtor (external link), on Flickr

Charles

Canon 60D Gripped * Canon XSi * Flickr Accountexternal link
Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Swinger
Member
Swinger's Avatar
101 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Toronto, on
Oct 04, 2012 07:25 |  #113

You know ..... it's nice to capture the moon with shorter length lenses just to say "Look what I shot last night", but lets face it - it does not compare to the detail in the picture Bruce (noisejammer) posted on the first page. Well done sir.

noisejammer wrote in post #14613971 (external link)
I got this with a 40D on a 12"f/6.3 scope... focal length was about 2000 mm.

QUOTED IMAGE
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...s/noisejammer/73010​38074/] (external link)




LOG IN TO REPLY
noisejammer
Goldmember
noisejammer's Avatar
1,053 posts
Joined May 2010
Toronto ON
Oct 04, 2012 20:59 |  #114

Swinger wrote in post #15078300external link
You know ..... it's nice to capture the moon with shorter length lenses just to say "Look what I shot last night", but lets face it - it does not compare to the detail in the picture Bruce (noisejammer) posted on the first page. Well done sir.

Thanks, Swinger - in truth this was something of a surprise but if you have access to a large scope, it becomes relatively easy. The tricks are always the same, use live view to focus, ETTR, use a tripod, keep the exposure short enough and use mirror lock up.


Several cameras and more glass than I will admit to.
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
noisejammer
Goldmember
noisejammer's Avatar
1,053 posts
Joined May 2010
Toronto ON
Oct 04, 2012 21:09 |  #115

ejenner wrote in post #14949036external link
Hmm, I tried photographing the moon a couple of years ago (Dec 21st, 2010) and it ended up looking red. I also needed ISO3200 and 1s on my T1i at f8 for the last shot and they ended up not looking very crisp at all.

Maybe I left my UV filter on? I should try it again sometime, maybe take off the filter and shoot when the earths shadow isn't in the way.

Actually, I think your image is QUITE FINE! If memory serves, there was a total lunar eclipse (TLE) that night. Toronto was clouded out so we missed it.

TLE's are a special case. First off, the moon must be within an hour or so of being completely full so the moon won't have any visible shadows and contrast must be low. Secondly, the moon is inside the earth's shadow so the moon can only be illuminated by light that is refracted and scattered by the earth's atmosphere. This light varies from light yellow to red/brown in colour and can be very faint compared with sunlight.

FWIW, dark / muddy TLE images are actually quite sought after by astrophotographers. They give us some insight into the amount of atmospheric particulates.

Edit... I re-read and got the gag. Damn :)


Several cameras and more glass than I will admit to.
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dgiglio3087
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
dgiglio3087's Avatar
520 posts
Joined May 2012
Slidell,LA
Jan 16, 2013 10:42 |  #116

Great photos everyone. I love how no two pictures look alike. Its almost as though its not the same moon lol.

Heres a more recent moon photo i took with my canon t3 with 55-250mm lens

IMAGE: http://www.gigliosgallery.com/Nature/The-Moon/i-JnVZzGS/0/L/8230584051_25202dbaa9_o%281%29-L.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.gigliosgall​ery.com ...672303&k=JnVZzGS&lb​=1&s=A] (external link)

I should also point out isnt it amazing to watch how fast the moon can travel out of frame? at first i thought my tripod was loose, then i realized it was the moon moving! lol

<---Daniel'sFlickrexternal link
Giglio's Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dgiglio3087
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
dgiglio3087's Avatar
520 posts
Joined May 2012
Slidell,LA
Jan 16, 2013 11:27 |  #117

Viffer wrote in post #15055374 (external link)
The rig Pentax Q + Canon EF 600mm MKII + staked EF extender MKIII & MKII.
Total equivalent focal length 13200mm f/16
Manual focus was a nightmare and so the image when viewed at 100% is way OOF
Image is full frame no crop just resize.

The monster rig
QUOTED IMAGE

The resulting Image.
QUOTED IMAGE

With practice I am hopping to master this rig and improve image IQ. For now and considering the amount of shaking involved when focusing (EF 600mm IS does not work with the pentax), I am relatively happy with this.

wow thats a crazy setup there lol
That lens is easily 10x the the size of the camera.. Nice shot!


<---Daniel'sFlickrexternal link
Giglio's Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kawi_200
Goldmember
1,392 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Everett, WA
Jan 16, 2013 14:12 |  #118

Viffer wrote in post #15055374external link
The rig Pentax Q + Canon EF 600mm MKII + staked EF extender MKIII & MKII.
Total equivalent focal length 13200mm f/16
Manual focus was a nightmare and so the image when viewed at 100% is way OOF
Image is full frame no crop just resize.

The monster rig

The resulting Image.


With practice I am hopping to master this rig and improve image IQ. For now and considering the amount of shaking involved when focusing (EF 600mm IS does not work with the pentax), I am relatively happy with this.

You can try using a second tripod or monopod on the camera body. That will make it so the body doesn't move around as much, and makes focusing easier.


5D2 | 8-15L |24-70mm f/4L IS | 24L II | 40mm pancake | 100L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS mk2 | 400mm f/4 DO IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
tickerguy
Senior Member
595 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Jan 16, 2013 14:13 |  #119

Try Registax. ;)


Canon 7D & 5d3, EF-S 15-85, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4 IS, 100mm Macro/L, EF 50 f/1.4 and more

LOG IN TO REPLY
Littleoldman
Member
Littleoldman's Avatar
157 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Jan 16, 2013 16:18 |  #120

nice shot




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

23,727 views & 0 likes for this thread
Shooting the moon
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00234 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is orangestone
881 guests, 621 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016