Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk 
Thread started 07 Oct 2012 (Sunday) 11:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5D Mark III + 100-400L + Kenko 1.4X DGX Autofocus?

 
Elfstop
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Tennessee
     
Nov 27, 2012 20:38 |  #46

If you have never used the combo the OP mentioned...how can you have any opinion?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,198 posts
Gallery: 156 photos
Likes: 194
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Nov 27, 2012 23:37 as a reply to  @ Elfstop's post |  #47

I was replying to Kitlens, the person who posted before me.
I was not replying to the OP.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Elfstop
Senior Member
Avatar
717 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Tennessee
     
Nov 28, 2012 06:36 |  #48

Then what I said does not apply to you..how did you git that it was?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
recrisp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,365 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Likes: 2552
Joined May 2008
Location: Paris, Texas
     
Nov 28, 2012 06:56 |  #49

Elfstop wrote in post #15298971 (external link)
Then what I said does not apply to you..how did you git that it was?


The reason he (Jeremy) probably thought you meant him is, you didn't quote who you were referring to, his reply was immediately above your post. Had you quoted who you were referring to, there would have not been any question.

I promise, this may sound as though I am being rude, but I am just saying how it reads from here. :) Please don't think that I am being a jerk, I am just trying to help clear things up.

Randy


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
recrisp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,365 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Likes: 2552
Joined May 2008
Location: Paris, Texas
     
Nov 28, 2012 07:05 |  #50

kit lens wrote in post #15294279 (external link)
I've been doing some research on this myself, and I am contemplating the Kenko MC4 2X extender paired with my 100-400L and my 1D3. Hmm....


I have a 2X converter and a 1.4, both are Kenko brand, I LOVE my 1.4 with my 1DIV, (with my 100-400mm) but not so much the 2.0. The 2.0 I only use for documenting things, I still get it out sometimes hoping that it will work better, but no so far.
Now, I have the Kenko 1.4 300, which is the good one, my 2.0 is not the top of the Kenko line, so that means a lot.

By that I mean, if you can, please try out the 2.0 first if you can so you don't invest your money, expecting really good quality.
I have seen people have REALLY good results using TWO 1.4 300 Kenko converters though, (stacking) Duane (I think) has used a Canon and Kenko brand to take his sharp eagle shots using a 1DIV.
Your 1DIII should be the same, so you may consider that.
Before I anyone thinks I have not tried that, I haven't, I just remember reading that, and seeing the shots, I was more than impressed. :D

Randy


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 164 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1829
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA USA
     
Nov 28, 2012 18:08 |  #51

recrisp wrote in post #15299047 (external link)
I have a 2X converter and a 1.4, both are Kenko brand, I LOVE my 1.4 with my 1DIV, (with my 100-400mm) but not so much the 2.0. The 2.0 I only use for documenting things, I still get it out sometimes hoping that it will work better, but no so far.
Now, I have the Kenko 1.4 300, which is the good one, my 2.0 is not the top of the Kenko line, so that means a lot.

By that I mean, if you can, please try out the 2.0 first if you can so you don't invest your money, expecting really good quality.
I have seen people have REALLY good results using TWO 1.4 300 Kenko converters though, (stacking) Duane (I think) has used a Canon and Kenko brand to take his sharp eagle shots using a 1DIV.
Your 1DIII should be the same, so you may consider that.
Before I anyone thinks I have not tried that, I haven't, I just remember reading that, and seeing the shots, I was more than impressed. :D

Randy

The Kenko I use is an old extender not made anymore. C-AF 1.5X Teleplus MC is what is written on it. It doesn't report that it's attached to the camera/lens and yes, it works fine stacked with a Canon 1.4 for static subjects. It works well in a pinch but I can see some detail loss.

Side note....this has nothing to do with the OP's question so no need to point out that fact. :p


www.3rdicreations.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,198 posts
Gallery: 156 photos
Likes: 194
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Nov 28, 2012 23:47 as a reply to  @ Duane N's post |  #52

Elfstop wrote in post #15298971 (external link)
Then what I said does not apply to you..how did you git that it was?

recrisp wrote in post #15299026 (external link)

The reason he (Jeremy) probably thought you meant him is, you didn't quote who you were referring to, his reply was immediately above your post. Had you quoted who you were referring to, there would have not been any question.

Randy

exactly. it appeared you were talking to me because I replied last.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mileslong24
Senior Member
508 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jun 2011
     
Dec 01, 2012 07:22 as a reply to  @ jhayesvw's post |  #53

I've stayed out of these arguments since there is obviously no changing some people's minds. I've seen numerous pics posted with the combos, which is what someone kept asking for, yet it doesn't matter. I'll just keep snappin away and laughing. But my T3i along with the 400 5.6 and Kenko Pro 300 has been awesome and I don't see any better options for slightly over 2k.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danwanfur
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
98 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: SF Bay Area, California
     
Dec 02, 2012 13:50 as a reply to  @ mileslong24's post |  #54

Thank you so much for all the comments. Since my last post I have had a chance to use the 5D Mark III + 100-400mm + Kenko 1.4x combination quite a bit. I was initially hoping to shoot raptors but haven't found the time so I have instead been practicing on shore birds. In general the combination works very well and I plan to continue using it for birding when I am focal length limited.

You can, for example, see a sequence of 6 consecutive frames (all sharp and in-focus) shot with the combination at 560mm f/8 here:
http://ffazalphotograp​hy.com …01299/h4dc9153e​#h4dc9153e (external link)

IMAGE: http://ffazalphotography.com/img/s2/v73/p1305023806-5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://ffazalphotograp​hy.com/p418201299/e4dc​9153e  (external link)

Here is a closer view of frame 4 in the sequence:
http://ffazalphotograp​hy.com …01839/h4dc8d7ac​#h4dc8d7ac (external link)
IMAGE: http://ffazalphotography.com/img/s2/v71/p1305008044-4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://ffazalphotograp​hy.com/p183801839/e4dc​8d7ac  (external link)

Pros of using extender:
1) Images are still sharp and I get greater detail than without the extender.
2) All 41 cross-type AF points work!
3) Tracking sensitivity is as good as bare lens.
4) The subject fills up more of the viewfinder and covers a larger number of cross-type AF points on the 5D3 for focusing and tracking. This is actually a huge benefit that I didn't appreciate until I started using the combination out in the field.

Cons:
1) Initial focus acquisition seems a tad slower than the bare lens.
2) Noticeable purple fringing at the corners. While easy to correct in LR4, it is still annoying.
3) Slight decrease in contrast.
4) Biggest issue is the most obvious one - now the combination is an f/8.0 lens, which really doesn't let much light in and won't blur the background as much as with a faster lens. This is the main reason I hope to upgrade to a faster lens when funds permit, but for now I'm happy with the combination.

5D Mark IV; Sony A7r; Samyang 14mm f/2.8; EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II; EF 24-70mm f/4.0L IS; EF 85mm f/1.8; Sigma 150-600mm f/5.0-6.3 DG C; EF 500mm f/4.0L IS I
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | 500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,600 views & 0 likes for this thread
5D Mark III + 100-400L + Kenko 1.4X DGX Autofocus?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
747 guests, 395 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.