Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 02 Jan 2013 (Wednesday) 14:26
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

buying used 70-200 f4 IS question

 
galleybob
Member
101 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Jan 02, 2013 14:26 |  #1

I found a Canon 70-200 f4 IS lens for sale that has been sent back to Canon for a faulty IS. Has been repaired and calibrated. Seller wants $800. Is that a good price for this lens. Since it has already had an IS failure, is it possible that there is a problem with the lens or should I not worry since Canon has fixed it.thanks




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,911 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 02, 2013 14:28 |  #2

If its been factory repaired I wouldnt be any more concerned than I would be over any other used lens where you dont know the history. I havent see the recent listings of this lens since I already have one and love it, but that was a good price back when I was looking.




LOG IN TO REPLY
pdrober2
Goldmember
pdrober2's Avatar
2,318 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Durham, NC
Jan 02, 2013 15:01 |  #3

price is a bit high, there were deals for this lens at ~$950 new in december. i would talk him down or wait for a better deal.


Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,671 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Jan 02, 2013 16:51 as a reply to pdrober2's post |  #4

if it's a newish lens that's a great price. if it's an older lens (3-5 years) that's well-used it's an okay price.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 430exII, gitzo 3542, markins Q10, kirk, really right stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
1Tanker's Avatar
4,470 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
Jan 02, 2013 18:06 as a reply to ed rader's post |  #5

I'd take it. I think that's a pretty good price... only ~$300 (max) more than a used non-IS will cost you!


Kel
Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
galleybob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
101 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Jan 02, 2013 22:46 as a reply to 1Tanker's post |  #6

I was thinking the same. Hope it's still available




LOG IN TO REPLY
nonick
Goldmember
1,587 posts
Joined Jun 2009
NYC
Jan 03, 2013 00:05 |  #7

It's an okay price if the conditon is excellent. An excellent used copy without any previous issue is priced about $875-900.


Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
vrjosh
Senior Member
260 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Kansas
Jan 04, 2013 12:08 |  #8

Having had a lens with an IS failure repaired by Canon I can safely say I would have no problem buying one that has been repaired. I know in my case they replaced the entire IS mechanism. I had no problems for the next 4 years that I owned it.


bobble.smugmug.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
galleybob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
101 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Jan 09, 2013 16:21 |  #9

The lens that was repaired was sold. I found another, UU for $825 without box. How old is UU. I haven't seen it yet but seller says it is pristine. with filter. I asked for $800 but he wants $825. Would this be a good deal? I have 85 1.8. Which would be better for indoors, no flash- 70-200 f4 IS or 85 1.8.




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,911 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 09, 2013 16:28 |  #10

galleybob wrote in post #15467499external link
The lens that was repaired was sold. I found another, UU for $825 without box. How old is UU. I haven't seen it yet but seller says it is pristine. with filter. I asked for $800 but he wants $825. Would this be a good deal? I have 85 1.8. Which would be better for indoors, no flash- 70-200 f4 IS or 85 1.8.

85 1.8 is better indoors as it lets in a lot more light. Google canon date codes for a full listing of codes.




LOG IN TO REPLY
galleybob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
101 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Jan 09, 2013 17:21 |  #11

Thanks, that was good info for me. UU would mean 2006




LOG IN TO REPLY
Ilovetheleafs
Raising uninteresting to new levels
Joined Jul 2011
Jan 09, 2013 17:22 |  #12

offer a low-ball offer the price seems mediocre.


Canon Rebel XS gripped, Canon 18 - 55mm, Sigma 18 - 200mm f3.5 - f6.3 DC OS HSM,Sigma 50mm f1.4 Olympus TG-810 Tough, LowePro Classified 160AW, Canon 430EX II Flash, Kata E-702

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,718 views & 0 likes for this thread
buying used 70-200 f4 IS question
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00119 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is BradMD96
816 guests, 411 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016