Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 14 Jan 2013 (Monday) 05:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Not happy with the 85 1.8

 
asaulo1
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Jan 14, 2013 17:01 |  #16

just recently re-bought this after selling it a few years ago when I had a crop body... since getting a 6D, I find the focal length more useful now.... like others have said, for a crop body, it seems like it's a little on the long end of being a portrait lens....


GEAR HOG in the making.... Canon 6D & 7D, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 24-105, 40 2.8, EF-S 55-250

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Yetihenry
Member
101 posts
Joined Nov 2012
Location: UK/Canada/NZ
     
Jan 14, 2013 17:13 |  #17

85mm on a 1.6x crop is 136mm. How is that considered such an odd focal length? If I had a FF I would have a 135mm f2 aswell. Its a good focal length for outdoor sports and tighter headshots.

Common holy trinity on FF:
35/85/135

1.6x crop:
24/50/85
(38/80/136)


Fuji Xe2 | 35mm F2 | 12mm F2 | 85mm f1.8 | My bag | Gear list/References

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dnauer
Senior Member
Avatar
523 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 24
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 14, 2013 17:23 |  #18

Since neither the 40D or 60D had MFA, maybe your particular 85 1.8 wasn't a match to your bodies? I've used the 85 1.8 on my 40D for several years and consider it one of my sharper lenses, and find the FL perfect for the closer shots for indoor arena dog agility -- especially with the quick focus. Maybe yours needed calibration? I just rented a 6D for about 5 days and really liked it on the 6D also.


Dave
70D; EF 24-105 f4L IS; EF 70-300 f4-5.6L IS; EF 200 f2.8L II; EF 85 f1.8; EF-S 24 f2.8 STM; Σ 30 f1.4; Σ 10-20 f4-f5.6; Kenko Pro300 DGX 1.4x

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swjim
Goldmember
1,663 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
     
Jan 14, 2013 20:28 |  #19

I never liked mine on my 30D but it really came to life on the 5D Mk II. Hopefully you'll have a similar experience.


Jim

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leftnose
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined May 2012
     
Jan 14, 2013 20:53 |  #20

35, 85, 135mm, they're all wonderful on FF. I, too, prefer the 1.8 to the 1.2. Faster focusing, lighter and still sharp as a tack. On a price/performance ratio, it may well be Canon's best lens.

This was on my 5D2:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


The 1.8 would be one of my last lenses to go if I had some reason why I had to sell my gear. My holy trinity is the 35L, 85/1.8, 135L and those are the three lenses I carry when I want the highest IQ I can get.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,039 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 14, 2013 21:07 |  #21

2cruise wrote in post #15486017 (external link)
when I had it on my 40D but on the Mark II will my happiness return? Has anyone else made this transition and been really happy?

I kinda hated it on 1.6x as well. It was CA obnoxious and I dunno...just weird.

I don't have full frame but I too wonder how I'd like it on the "new" 1.3x stuff I'm using.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stone ­ 13
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
Jan 14, 2013 22:26 |  #22

I'll admit it's a pretty awkward focal length for me on my crop body and since I purchased the 70-200 it's probably my least used lens. But it comes in handy for indoor sports especially shooting from the stands so I keep it for those rare occasions when there are no "long lenses" allowed. It's also pretty cheap so I see no need to sell it off....


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snakeman55
Goldmember
Avatar
1,223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Baltimore, Md
     
Jan 14, 2013 23:54 |  #23

2cruise wrote in post #15486017 (external link)
when I had it on my 40D but on the Mark II will my happiness return? Has anyone else made this transition and been really happy?

I've been pretty disappointed on 50D and 5DII with the 85 1.8. I think for me it's not the lens so much as I can't get in a rhythm with the focal length. I much prefer 24 and 50 for FF. Most people seem to prefer 35 and 85.


-Adam
Wedding Photographers in Maryland (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
4,260 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 173
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Jan 16, 2013 05:45 |  #24

2cruise wrote in post #15486017 (external link)
when I had it on my 40D but on the Mark II will my happiness return? Has anyone else made this transition and been really happy?

Not with a 85 but yes, with primes in general. On my 60D i hated using my 50mm f/1.4, i never really thought it was a good copy, especially under f/2.8, but on my 5DMKIII its fantastic. My main lens is now a 100 f/2 and im sure id love the 85 f/1.8 now as well now.
I had the 85 f/1.8 and although it was a nice lens i didn't use it much. Hated the amount of CA/PF (back in the days before LR4.2) and found it too long as an every day lens on my 40D and 60D. I guess losing the crop factor has made all my lenses seem different now.

Its funny but now i have a 5DMKIII i much prefer primes to zooms.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon 80D | Canon 650D | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nonick
Goldmember
1,587 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: NYC
     
Jan 16, 2013 08:24 |  #25

dave_bass5 wrote in post #15495113 (external link)
Not with a 85 but yes, with primes in general. On my 60D i hated using my 50mm f/1.4, i never really thought it was a good copy, especially under f/2.8, but on my 5DMKIII its fantastic. My main lens is now a 100 f/2 and im sure id love the 85 f/1.8 now as well now.
I had the 85 f/1.8 and although it was a nice lens i didn't use it much. Hated the amount of CA/PF (back in the days before LR4.2) and found it too long as an every day lens on my 40D and 60D. I guess losing the crop factor has made all my lenses seem different now.

Its funny but now i have a 5DMKIII i much prefer primes to zooms.

My 50/1.4 copy was not very sharp until 2.8...


Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,306 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 138
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 16, 2013 08:34 |  #26

Been playing around with mine since I got it on Monday.. 1.8 is decent, 2.0/2.2 are pretty damn sharp.. I'd put it on par with my 135L.

100% crop at f/2

IMAGE: http://gallery.brandonharrisphotography.com/img/s2/v72/p1383074272.jpg

[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
4,260 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 173
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Jan 16, 2013 08:40 |  #27

nonick wrote in post #15495382 (external link)
My 50/1.4 copy was not very sharp until 2.8...

I think a lot of people find this, although i do find it a lot more usable on my 5D than on my previous crop bodies.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon 80D | Canon 650D | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,951 posts
Gallery: 403 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3795
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
     
Jan 16, 2013 09:20 |  #28

BrandonSi wrote in post #15495421 (external link)
Been playing around with mine since I got it on Monday.. 1.8 is decent, 2.0/2.2 are pretty damn sharp.. I'd put it on par with my 135L.

100% crop at f/2

QUOTED IMAGE

I would be happy with this!


5D Mark IV~70-300mm f4L IS~16-35 f4L IS ~Zeiss 21mm 2.8~Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro-Planar~Canon 85mm 1.8~Rokinon 14mm~2.8~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bimmergrl86
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Canada
     
Jan 16, 2013 09:22 |  #29

85mm 1.8 is a great lens! Just got a 50mm 1.2 and a 24-70mm 2.8 recently... if anyone is interested in buying my 85mm 1.8... pm me! :)


Canon 5D Mark II - 24-70mm 2.8 | 70-200mm 2.8 | 50mm 1.2 | 430EXII speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,306 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 138
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jan 16, 2013 09:40 |  #30

2cruise wrote in post #15495648 (external link)
I would be happy with this!

Mine (purchased brand new) needed MA of +4, I was a bit disappointed out of the box until I dialed it in. Still don't love it at f/1.8, so I couldn't believe the sharpness difference just stopping down 1/3 of stop to f/2 until I saw it with my own eyes. It's even better at 2.2. FWIW, I'm just considering this an f/2 lens from now on, like my 135.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,335 views & 0 likes for this thread
Not happy with the 85 1.8
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EinarM7
680 guests, 372 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.