LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Does this lens work on Canon 6D ?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 29 Mar 2013 (Friday) 15:34   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
Joined Aug 2007
10,051 posts
San Jose, California
[MORE/SHARE]

H7O wrote in post #15770369external link
Thank you so much all for the replies. that was really informative.These forums are really active!

Rocky Rhode, I'm not a photographer, just enthusiast about gadgets and the technology behind them.

I just got my first DSLR (1100D) free through some credit card reward program and got really curious about how images would look like in a quality lens like a 1.2L USM or better yet in a quality camera like the 6D.

So I thought I could either buy an 85mm 1.2L USM for my 1100D or a Canon 6D body (they're approx the same price).

However, given by what everyone is saying, it seems I have to get me some cheap 85mm prime lens if I decided to go with the 6D.

A better quality lens on your present camera will give you far more image quality improvement than swapping cameras would.

Doesn't need to be an über expensive L, such as the 85/1.2 II, either. An EF 85/1.8 is actually faster focusing, more general purpose, a lot more compact/lighter, would probably balance better on your camera, has very fine image quality potential, and costs a whole heckuvalot less.

There are various lenses that you might consider... both Canon EF and EF-S can be used on your camera, plus many lenses from third party manufacturers (Tokina, Sigma, Tamron, etc.)

Post #16, Mar 30, 2013 11:22:41


Alan Myers
"Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3) & other cameras, various lenses/access. - FLICKRexternal link - PRINTROOMexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
H7O
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2013
9 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

amfoto1 wrote in post #15772390external link
A better quality lens on your present camera will give you far more image quality improvement than swapping cameras would.

Doesn't need to be an über expensive L, such as the 85/1.2 II, either. An EF 85/1.8 is actually faster focusing, more general purpose, a lot more compact/lighter, would probably balance better on your camera, has very fine image quality potential, and costs a whole heckuvalot less.

There are various lenses that you might consider... both Canon EF and EF-S can be used on your camera, plus many lenses from third party manufacturers (Tokina, Sigma, Tamron, etc.)

Ya, I just bought today the 6D along with a EF 85mm f/1.8 USM lens (really happy about the purchase so far, pic below).

I think, correct me if I'm wrong, the 6D + 85mm f/1.8 USM is an overall better setup than a 1100D + 85mm f/1.2L USM.

IMAGE: https://5lu82w.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p4INVitD4k8MMZnfOsWzdMoSDG6xtwSNRlPon-juuZTtw53OxUAFB3SBaxn5eQr8W3ZXlvh3yhKDbQnzeUWWebAEH05cf4nJt/_MG_0255-small.jpg

Post #17, Mar 30, 2013 13:19:13




LOG IN TO REPLY
Anthon
Senior Member
Joined May 2012
267 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Rocky Rhode wrote in post #15769988external link
Better question; why would you want to put a $90 lens on a $2,000.00 body???

Maybe even better question: why would want to invest $2000 in a body, while you can't even tell the difference between EF and EF-S lens? :confused:

Post #18, Mar 30, 2013 13:57:00


Canon 5D mark II Gripped / 17-40mm f4 L / 24-105mm f4 L / Canon 70-200 f4 L / Samyang 14mm 2.8 AE / Pentax SMC 50mm f1.7 / Pentax SMC 28 2.8 / Canon Speedlite 600ex-rt / Canon Speedlite 580ex II / YN560 II

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
Joined Apr 2003
40,787 posts
Providence RI
[MORE/SHARE]

H7O wrote in post #15771813external link
Thanks everyone, I just bought the Canon 6D along with a cheap Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM lens.

Yes, this IS an amazing little lens!

Post #19, Mar 30, 2013 18:40:10


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
My POTN Share Threads
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
RTPVid
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2010
3,365 posts
MN
[MORE/SHARE]

Rocky Rhode wrote in post #15769988external link
Better question; why would you want to put a $90 lens on a $2,000.00 body???

Anthon wrote in post #15772774external link
Maybe even better question: why would want to invest $2000 in a body, while you can't even tell the difference between EF and EF-S lens? :confused:

Peas in a pod, for sure. Go for the ridicule rather than the answer.

Post #20, Mar 30, 2013 19:10:31 as a reply to CyberDyneSystems's post 30 minutes earlier.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
RobDickinson
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2010
3,809 posts
New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

H7O wrote in post #15772204external link
Thanks, I'm really happy with my purchase! I don't know if it's the sensor, the DIGIC 5+ chip, or the f/1.8, or maybe all combined, but the low light performance on this 6D is just insane!

Compared to the crop body with kit lens you have a huge low light upgrade.

rebel with 18-55 at 55mm is f5.6. So the 85/1.8 is 3 and a bit stops optically faster, and the 6d is near 2 stops better in low light, so thats about 5 stops better in total.

Or 32 times more sensitive!


H7O wrote in post #15772671external link
I think, correct me if I'm wrong, the 6D + 85mm f/1.8 USM is an overall better setup than a 1100D + 85mm f/1.2L USM.

Yes it is. The 85L is under a stop faster than the 85/1.8 and isnt that much better a lens (actually many people own both or go for the f1.8).

Post #21, Mar 30, 2013 21:47:19


www.rjd.co.nzexternal link www.zarphag.comexternal link
5d2,6D,14mmf2.8,16-35 f4 L IS,17-40L,24mm tse,70-200/2.8L,50/1.4,90/2.8​,400/5.6L,gigapan epic pro, lee filters, feisol tripod, markins q3t

LOG IN TO REPLY
Luta13
Senior Member
Luta13's Avatar
Joined Mar 2013
185 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

My friend, enjoy that camera! It is absolutely stunning. The better the glass you place in front of that sensor the more you will be blown away...start saving up...and congrats

Post #22, Mar 31, 2013 01:01:51


- Mike -
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/luta_foto/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
H7O
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2013
9 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks everyone. Loving these forums.
RobDickinson, thanks, that was very informative!

Post #23, Mar 31, 2013 12:10:20




LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2011
2,551 posts
Central New Jersey
[MORE/SHARE]

Rocky Rhode wrote in post #15769988external link
Better question; why would you want to put a $90 lens on a $2,000.00 body???

Completely Agree, but its actually 1 $200 lens, just to be accurate.

Post #24, Mar 31, 2013 15:00:10


Mark
Canon 60D, T3i, T2i, Sigma18-35 f/1.8, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, Canon EFs 15-85, EFs 18-200, EF 50mm f/1.8, Tamron 18-270 PZD, B+W MRC CPL, Canon 320EX, Vanguard Alta Pro 254CT & SBH 250 head. RODE Stereo Videomic Pro, Lightroom 5, Elements 13

LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2010
3,809 posts
New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

Good bodies make great use of cheap lenses!

Post #25, Mar 31, 2013 16:19:53


www.rjd.co.nzexternal link www.zarphag.comexternal link
5d2,6D,14mmf2.8,16-35 f4 L IS,17-40L,24mm tse,70-200/2.8L,50/1.4,90/2.8​,400/5.6L,gigapan epic pro, lee filters, feisol tripod, markins q3t

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
5,152 views & 0 likes for this thread
Does this lens work on Canon 6D ?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00099 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
774 guests, 519 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is besomuk

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.