Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 24 Jul 2013 (Wednesday) 09:30
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Best all around lens for crop body?

 
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
DreDaze's Avatar
17,718 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Joined Mar 2006
S.F. Bay Area
Jul 27, 2013 12:10 |  #31

Dexinthecity wrote in post #16158219external link
thanks for all the replies guys, lets switch up and say primes. What would you guys recommend for prime?

btw I'm still leaning towards the sigma 18-35mm

with this sentence from your first post in mind:

Dexinthecity wrote:
She/we need a good all-in-one lens for our travels. We'll be shooting everything from portraits, landscape, animals, etc.

there is no prime lens that will allow you to do all...

if you really want a do it all lens, from portraits to animals...you'll need one of the superzooms with more reach...like the tamron 18-270VC recommended earlier

an 18-35mm would be good for some landscapes, and general walk around...the range would work for environmental portraits...but it's a little wide for half body/head shots


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)
my 366 for 2016 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Rocky ­ Rhode
Goldmember
Rocky Rhode's Avatar
1,416 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Sacramento
Jul 27, 2013 13:43 as a reply to DreDaze's post |  #32

Go with the Sigma triple play

17-50 f/2.8
50-150 f/2.8
120-300 f/2.8


GEAR LIST Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
DreDaze's Avatar
17,718 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Joined Mar 2006
S.F. Bay Area
Jul 27, 2013 13:44 |  #33

Rocky Rhode wrote in post #16158535external link
Go with the Sigma triple play

17-50 f/2.8
50-150 f/2.8
120-300 f/2.8

for travel?


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)
my 366 for 2016 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
d8w
Member
129 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Cleveland
Jul 28, 2013 22:45 |  #34

If you absolutely must get one prime that can do the most for you, get a 28, 30, or 35mm. Those focal lengths will give you wide enough field of view for some landscapes and group shots and it is closest to the naked eye's field of view. If you shoot tighter, you can get some decent portraits, though that's subjective to what's in your background and the depth of field (not as thin as longer primes).


Gear | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
Senior Member
eddieb1's Avatar
679 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Oregon
Jul 31, 2013 10:07 |  #35

DC Fan wrote in post #16152524 (external link)
The Canon 18-200mm image stabilizer lens actually produced these images.

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | Content warning: script
QUOTED IMAGE


QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

The lens went on a camera and the shutter button was pushed. That's all it took.

I have to agree with DC FAN. I bought the Canon 18-200 a little while ago, and I still smile when I take a photo, because the IQ is so good.




LOG IN TO REPLY
ceegee
Goldmember
2,320 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Montreal, Quebec
Jul 31, 2013 10:20 |  #36

Dexinthecity wrote in post #16149551external link
She/we need a good all-in-one lens for our travels. We'll be shooting everything from portraits, landscape, animals, etc.

Given this, I personally would find the 18-35 range extremely limiting. It'd be ok for landscapes, but not so much for portraits and far from ideal for animals. Also, for travel, thin DOF may not be what you're looking for, in many cases.

On my 7D, I travel mostly with the 24-105/70-200 f4 IS combo. In some cases I replace the 70-200 with my 12-24, depending on the destination. But I would hate to think that my longest focal length was 35 mm. I'd say that more than 90% of my shots are beyond 35 mm. But then, that's just me. Your style is certainly different, if you're contemplating the 18-35.

For a one-lens solution, something like the 15-85 or 24-105 would probably cover the vast majority of your needs.


Gear: Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Canon 24-105L f4, Canon 70-300L, Canon 60 macro f/2.8, Speedlite 580 EXII, 2x AB800

Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
sirquack's Avatar
Joined Jan 2013
Des Moines, Iowa
Jul 31, 2013 10:23 |  #37

If I was only going to carry one prime as my full time shooter, I would go with my Sigma 30 1.4. It is not going to do a lot for you on distance shots, but anything close is gonna be great.
I am with one other responder though, if you keep the 18-55, get a 70-200 in addition to that lens and you have most of the range covered in those two lenses. My 70-200 is always on my T3i and only comes off for Macro and close range shots. It has been the most versatile lens in my bag by far.


Name is Ron.
Camera Bodies - T3i/(6D/7D2)-Gripped : Light - Yongnuo 565 EX/Mettle 600 Strobe
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Flickr (external link)
Edit photos as needed

LOG IN TO REPLY
phoomanchew
Member
phoomanchew's Avatar
65 posts
Joined May 2012
Greater Cincinnati Area
Jul 31, 2013 12:20 as a reply to sirquack's post |  #38

To throw my 2cents into this discussion, I would suggest the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. :)


Canon 7D | BG-E7 grip | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | EF 70-200mm f/4.0L | 430EX II Speedlite | RRS TVC-34L | RRS BH-55 LR

LOG IN TO REPLY
iadubber
Goldmember
1,425 posts
Joined May 2009
Dubuque, IA
Jul 31, 2013 13:17 |  #39

phoomanchew wrote in post #16169961external link
To throw my 2cents into this discussion, I would suggest the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. :)

I just bought mine yesterday on FM. Can't wait to get it!


Buyer/Seller Feedback
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
phoomanchew
Member
phoomanchew's Avatar
65 posts
Joined May 2012
Greater Cincinnati Area
Jul 31, 2013 13:35 |  #40

iadubber wrote in post #16170105external link
I just bought mine yesterday on FM. Can't wait to get it!

Congrats! I hope you love it as much as I do... It is a fantastic lens...


Canon 7D | BG-E7 grip | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | EF 70-200mm f/4.0L | 430EX II Speedlite | RRS TVC-34L | RRS BH-55 LR

LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelPusher
Goldmember
PixelPusher's Avatar
Joined Feb 2009
Surf City, USA - Left Coast
Jul 31, 2013 15:45 |  #41

phoomanchew wrote in post #16170157external link
Congrats! I hope you love it as much as I do... It is a fantastic lens...

+1 for the 17-55. Really fast focusing and shoots great in low light! Hardly ever use my flash for indoor shots.


Robert
7DII, 7DI, 400D, 500 F4L IS, 400 F5.6L, 70-200 F2.8L IS, 17-55 F2.8 IS, 420EX, Gitzo 3541XLS, Wimberley WH-200 VII
SmugMug (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
neil@domino.org
Member
55 posts
Joined May 2006
Jul 31, 2013 16:52 |  #42

24-105 f4L IS answers both questions.




LOG IN TO REPLY
roshan_thomas
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Jul 31, 2013 21:19 |  #43

neil@domino.org wrote in post #16170698external link
24-105 f4L IS answers both questions.

I just wanted to find out how the 24-105 would perform indoor and outdoor from your point of view? I heard about outdoor it is excellent. But how about indoor? Did you have to use it with flash only? How's the AF & IQ? Like if the kids r running (indoors), would we get better pictures? I am using T4i and wondering if changing the kit lens 18-55mm to 24-105 would make a big difference like "WOW" factor.


Thanks
Roshan


T4i, 18-55mm,55-250mm ii & 50m 1.8, 40mm 2.8 & the latest collection 85mm 1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sdblade
Member
66 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Jul 31, 2013 21:25 |  #44

archer1960 wrote in post #16149811external link
Tamron 18-270.


This.




LOG IN TO REPLY
mickeyb105
Goldmember
mickeyb105's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Vero Beach, FL
Jul 31, 2013 22:28 |  #45

All- around prime for crop? Hard to beat the Sigma 30 1.4.

Took it with me to Sea World and Magic Kingdom as my lone lens and it was a winner.


Sony A99ii, RX-100ii, Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 ZA, Minolta HS 200 2.8 APO, Zeiss 24/2 ZA, Minolta 2xTC APO, HVL-F43M
Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

8,993 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best all around lens for crop body?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00294 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is jjscott2004
1044 guests, 472 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016