Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge
Thread started 27 Sep 2013 (Friday) 19:14
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Ron Howard's "Rush" - Too Many Canons?

 
poplogic
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Manteca, CA
Sep 27, 2013 19:14 |  #1

Hello all, just got back from seeing "Rush" in the theater and despite all the dazzling action and cinematography, during the scenes that featured the paparazzi and press corps I couldn't help but notice that (a) all the Nikons and Pentaxes had their nameplates either taped off or blanked out whereas the Canons weren't and (b) Canon was represented in a big way near the end of the film at the Japan GP.

It's no secret that Ron Howard is bedfellows with Canon, which would account for this behavior, but my question is (for those of you that are old enough to remember, as I was only 5 years old in 1976) was Canon truly that prevalent during that time? I could swear that Nikon and Pentax ruled the world during that time period, amirite?


"To be shunned by geeks is to be truly alone."

My gear list | My day jobexternal link :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Sep 28, 2013 04:17 |  #2

Canon was a major F1 sponsor for a number of years. They held the prime spot on the rear wing of Williams during Nigel Mansell's era. Obviously, Mansell was later than the time period in which "Rush" takes place.

Howard's affiliation with Canon probably played a part in product placement as well.

$$$ Talks!


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
navydoc's Avatar
10,869 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Inland Empire, So. Cal
Sep 28, 2013 09:38 as a reply to FlyingPhotog's post |  #3

This is just a personal observation but in the sixties, during the Vietnam war, I recall Nikon as being the number one camera of photo journalists. In fact, that's what prompted me to buy a Nikon F PhotomicT when my ship visited Japan in 1966 (I used that camera for over 30 years).


Gene - My Photo Gallery ||external link My USS Oriskany websiteexternal link || My Flickrexternal link
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Fester
Senior Member
814 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Texas, South of the border of Mexico
Sep 28, 2013 10:36 |  #4

FYI.. any product that show up, in any films today are paid for by the endorser.
There is a huge business in Hollywood that places products in scenes and are paid for, much the same as a commercial. Apple Budweiser Pepsi Starbucks Ford , any time you can see and read the product name you can rest assure that they paid for the product placement. The more is appears on the screen the more it cost them.
James Bond and Omega watches was one of the early placements.
I think it was Shreck 2's opening scene that had Starbucks Burger king Best Buy and others in it for a huge commercial




LOG IN TO REPLY
TTUShooter
Senior Member
TTUShooter's Avatar
Joined Oct 2012
Dallas, TX
Oct 01, 2013 16:35 |  #5

Cash money dollar dollar bill y'all.

Thats the extent of my thoughtfull analysis.


Cameras: EOS 7d mark II, Fuji X-Pro 1, Leica M2, AE-1 Program, Canonet QL17 GIII, Bessa R2M
Lenses: A Whole mess of them.
My flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ROGERWILCO357
Goldmember
ROGERWILCO357's Avatar
1,551 posts
Joined Sep 2009
michigan
Oct 09, 2013 00:14 |  #6

Money talks and the rest get taped up ....lol


EOS 5DMKII gripped;EOS 7D;30D:Rebel Xti Digital;24-105L,70-200 f/2.8L.II,85mm f1.2L.II,16-35Lmk2, SP AF90mmF/2.8DI,28-135mm x 2,580EX II-430ExII with Pocket Wizards II,(Adobe CS5)

LOG IN TO REPLY
displaced ­ texan
Member
displaced texan's Avatar
174 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Louseyana
Oct 09, 2013 08:30 as a reply to ROGERWILCO357's post |  #7

This thread reminds me of this:

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=LAjXYfTtGasexternal link




LOG IN TO REPLY
irishman
Goldmember
irishman's Avatar
4,098 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Scottsdale, AZ
Oct 11, 2013 00:22 |  #8

navydoc wrote in post #16331167external link
This is just a personal observation but in the sixties, during the Vietnam war, I recall Nikon as being the number one camera of photo journalists. In fact, that's what prompted me to buy a Nikon F PhotomicT when my ship visited Japan in 1966 (I used that camera for over 30 years).

The movie is set in the mid-70's. What's funny is in one scene you can see a guy chimping,


6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.

LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
navydoc's Avatar
10,869 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Inland Empire, So. Cal
Oct 12, 2013 03:25 |  #9

irishman wrote in post #16362195external link
The movie is set in the mid-70's. What's funny is in one scene you can see a guy chimping,

I'm just curious and have no idea but are you saying that by the 70's, Nikon was no longer considered the camera of choice for photo journalists?


Gene - My Photo Gallery ||external link My USS Oriskany websiteexternal link || My Flickrexternal link
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
tonylong's Avatar
54,592 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Oct 12, 2013 03:31 |  #10

I'm curious, trying to remember but can't...when did "product placement" start in movies and TV shows?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
tonylong's Avatar
54,592 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Oct 12, 2013 03:34 |  #11

Was it the "RCA Dog"?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
pixiepearls
I do bad things in the dark
pixiepearls's Avatar
3,061 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Oct 17, 2013 19:00 |  #12

navydoc wrote in post #16331167external link
This is just a personal observation but in the sixties, during the Vietnam war, I recall Nikon as being the number one camera of photo journalists. In fact, that's what prompted me to buy a Nikon F PhotomicT when my ship visited Japan in 1966 (I used that camera for over 30 years).

My dad was a combat photographer in Vietnam and he used a Nikon also.


Brandy 500pxexternal link
I ♥ my 5D TF'd March '11
DARKROOM CHEMIST BLOGexternal link - My Dad's Pixexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Oct 18, 2013 01:07 |  #13

pixiepearls wrote in post #16379069external link
My dad was a combat photographer in Vietnam and he used a Nikon also.

That was a rough job in those jungles. Those guys in the black pajamas and sneakers didn't distinguish between soldiers and non-combatants. I saw several photographers buy the farm.

And yes, most of them used Nikons. I had a Pentax, but then I was a grunt, not a journalist.




LOG IN TO REPLY
YamahaRob
Senior Member
YamahaRob's Avatar
571 posts
Joined Dec 2009
WI
Oct 21, 2013 03:19 |  #14

tonylong wrote in post #16364734external link
I'm curious, trying to remember but can't...when did "product placement" start in movies and TV shows?

My guess within the last 10 yrs. I remember commercials that used cars (not commercials for selling cars) in them never covered the brand logo. Now I'm seeing shirts and hats being blurred out if theres any logo on them on some "reality" tv shows where people on the street are visable. Getting kind of out of hand.


Rob
Nikon D300
Canon AE-1P (it becomes digital when pics are scanned in with a scanner:lol:)

LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Oct 21, 2013 10:31 as a reply to YamahaRob's post |  #15

Well guys, in the 1978 "Superman" movie with Christopher Reeve, General Mills not only prominently placed Cheerios cereal on Clark Kent's breakfast table, but got a "Cheerios by General Mills" byline in the credits. Yes, money changed hands.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,490 views & 0 likes for this thread
Ron Howard's "Rush" - Too Many Canons?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0043 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.06s
Latest registered member is jjscott2004
1044 guests, 471 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016