Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 24 Nov 2013 (Sunday) 13:56
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 5D III vs. Nikon D800E Test

 
sega62
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Dec 01, 2013 15:04 |  #286

snoop99 wrote in post #16492872 (external link)
Already invested too much in L glass. Here is a picture taken with 5DII that could benefit from A7R or D800E extra 2.5 stops in the shadows. I get vertical banding if try to recover to much in the shadows.

QUOTED IMAGE
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/keviikev/799170​2369/] (external link)
Sunset at Lincoln Memorial (external link) by keviikev (external link), on Flickr

Nice picture!
for a 5dII ;)




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jdizzle
Darth Noink
jdizzle's Avatar
69,419 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Harvesting Nano crystals
Dec 01, 2013 15:23 |  #287

Bakewell wrote in post #16492915external link
One is all my ego needs.

It's not about ego. I can afford to buy the gear bcoz' I actually get paid work. ;)




LOG IN TO REPLY
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Irvine, CA
Dec 01, 2013 16:12 |  #288
banned

jdizzle wrote in post #16493248external link
It's not about ego. I can afford to buy the gear bcoz' I actually get paid work. ;)

Really? You need all your cameras for your "paid" work? Naw...


Dave

LOG IN TO REPLY
HoodedJustice
Member
HoodedJustice's Avatar
53 posts
Joined Nov 2013
Dec 01, 2013 18:00 |  #289

Bakewell wrote in post #16492496external link
I don't think anyone claimed Canon was perfect...just closer than Nikon.

You say that while owning a 6d. Which is a rip off.


Canon 5d Mark III. 35L, 85L, 135L holy trinity!
less gear more shooting! bw!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Irvine, CA
Dec 01, 2013 18:05 |  #290
banned

HoodedJustice wrote in post #16493584external link
You say that while owning a 6d. Which is a rip off.

You boys are hilarious!


Dave

LOG IN TO REPLY
HoodedJustice
Member
HoodedJustice's Avatar
53 posts
Joined Nov 2013
Dec 01, 2013 18:06 |  #291

Bakewell wrote in post #16493597external link
You boys are hilarious!

I shoot canon, but i'd take a d600 and risk it, then take a gimped 6d.


Canon 5d Mark III. 35L, 85L, 135L holy trinity!
less gear more shooting! bw!

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
Goldmember
andrikos's Avatar
1,905 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Stuttgart, Germany
Dec 01, 2013 18:13 |  #292

HoodedJustice wrote in post #16493600external link
I shoot canon, but i'd take a d600 and risk it, then take a gimped 6d.

So you'd buy a d600 and then you'd buy a 6D?
Excellent.


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

LOG IN TO REPLY
HoodedJustice
Member
HoodedJustice's Avatar
53 posts
Joined Nov 2013
Dec 01, 2013 18:14 |  #293

andrikos wrote in post #16493618external link
So you'd buy a d600 and then you'd buy a 6D?
Excellent.

No. You know what I meant. 6d is an insult to the consumer. I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole.


Canon 5d Mark III. 35L, 85L, 135L holy trinity!
less gear more shooting! bw!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Irvine, CA
Dec 01, 2013 18:16 |  #294
banned

HoodedJustice wrote in post #16493600external link
I shoot canon, but i'd take a d600 and risk it, then take a gimped 6d.

I know you have one of the problem Canon cameras which you paid dearly for but that's really not a reason to belittle a quality camera like the 6D...but if it makes you feel better...


Dave

LOG IN TO REPLY
HoodedJustice
Member
HoodedJustice's Avatar
53 posts
Joined Nov 2013
Dec 01, 2013 18:19 |  #295

Bakewell wrote in post #16493628external link
I know you have one of the problem Canon cameras which you paid dearly for but that's really not a reason to belittle a quality camera like the 6D...but if it makes you feel better...

I'm probably selling soon. I do landscape and canon's sensor is almost embarrassing.


Canon 5d Mark III. 35L, 85L, 135L holy trinity!
less gear more shooting! bw!

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
Goldmember
andrikos's Avatar
1,905 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Stuttgart, Germany
Dec 01, 2013 18:26 |  #296

HoodedJustice wrote in post #16493638external link
I'm probably selling soon. I do landscape and canon's sensor is almost embarrassing.

Dude, if you're not happy with your gear, just sell and move on.
Nobody cares about your gear other that you.


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

LOG IN TO REPLY
HoodedJustice
Member
HoodedJustice's Avatar
53 posts
Joined Nov 2013
Dec 01, 2013 18:27 |  #297

andrikos wrote in post #16493656external link
Dude, if you're not happy with your gear, just sell and move on.
Nobody cares about your gear other that you.

Obviously you do, if you're commenting. Stop trying to start a fight.


Canon 5d Mark III. 35L, 85L, 135L holy trinity!
less gear more shooting! bw!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Dec 01, 2013 18:34 |  #298

andrikos wrote in post #16493656external link
Dude, if you're not happy with your gear, just sell and move on.
Nobody cares about your gear other that you.

that is a uppercut!!!!
It hurts

He kinds of deserved it, cause he is on a CANON FORUM after all, and we don't take crappy words!
The equipment is one part of the photo, I would like to see some of people's work!
Lets stop feeding this thread for god's sake!




LOG IN TO REPLY
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Irvine, CA
Dec 01, 2013 18:50 |  #299
banned

sega62 wrote in post #16493682external link
that is a uppercut!!!!
It hurts

He kinds of deserved it, cause he is on a CANON FORUM after all, and we don't take crappy words!
The equipment is one part of the photo, I would like to see some of people's work!
Lets stop feeding this thread for god's sake!

Are we having fun yet! I am!!


Dave

LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
Goldmember
andrikos's Avatar
1,905 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Stuttgart, Germany
Dec 01, 2013 18:55 |  #300

sega62 wrote in post #16493682external link
that is a uppercut!!!!
It hurts

He kinds of deserved it, cause he is on a CANON FORUM after all, and we don't take crappy words!
The equipment is one part of the photo, I would like to see some of people's work!
Lets stop feeding this thread for god's sake!

I wasn't even being sarcastic.
The guy spent over $6k on his equipment and he's not happy with his results.
I'd be pissed too,


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

42,300 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 5D III vs. Nikon D800E Test
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00292 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is gazman1812
827 guests, 292 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017