Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries
Thread started 11 Aug 2011 (Thursday) 12:04
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Post your Flickr Explored images!

 
pulsar123
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2010
Canada
Nov 17, 2014 11:11 |  #301

I actually didn't expect such a boring subject (my own house) to make it to explore, but it did, with the highest position #63:

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7558/15616363747_d4abdfcae3_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pMXW​SP] (external link)Untitled (external link) by syamastro (external link), on Flickr

6D, Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, Laowa 15mm 1:1 macro, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jack880
Goldmember
jack880's Avatar
Joined Apr 2011
Manchester, UK
Nov 28, 2014 13:20 |  #302

suchimoh wrote in post #17297777 (external link)
Morning :

QUOTED IMAGE

Flikr (external link)

Wow, amazing shot!! Love it

Are you sure it's on Explore though? Only 11 views....


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/jackhenriques/ (external link)
1DX, 7D, 20D, S110, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 16-35 f/2.8 L II, 50 f/1.8 II, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 17 f/4 L, 8-15 f/4 L, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6, Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro, x1.4 extender II, Kenko extension tubes, 430 EX II x 2

LOG IN TO REPLY
Arutemu
Goldmember
Arutemu's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Columbus/Yokohama
Dec 02, 2014 00:16 |  #303

This one of mine did well. The best-performing so far... :)

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7580/15903159605_45f42ddf98_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qeiR​hZ] (external link)Empire in winter (external link) by Arutemu (external link), on Flickr

住めば/external linkFlickrexternal link
GEAR / FEEDBACK

LOG IN TO REPLY
cutwater
Goldmember
cutwater's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
near Saratoga Springs, NY
Dec 03, 2014 12:37 |  #304

A couple of questions for you Explored folks...

I read a thread on Flickr that account created roughly June 2012 and newer are not included in Explored. I go through the Explored images every few days and have not seen a newer account in there - no, I don't look at every image, just a small sample. Is this really true?

And the other question, lately I see 3-5 photos from one user account in Explore on the same day. I thought the "algorithm" didn't allow for multiple photos from the same user on the same day. Let me know if this assumption is wrong.

Thanks!


Websiteexternal link flickrexternal link 500pxexternal link FaceBookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
. . . overboard with the tea . . .
Harm's Avatar
48,564 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Joined Jan 2008
Post has been edited over 3 years ago by Harm.
Dec 03, 2014 12:42 |  #305

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7550/15577277037_136a3df702_b.jpg


SmugMugexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tshred
Member
tshred's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
The Silicon Prairie, USA
Dec 03, 2014 12:55 |  #306

My question is, since there is no group of people selecting Explored photos, can a machine really determine what is a good photograph? If you look at the top 100 or so Explored pics on any day, there are some truly remarkable ones. Somehow they came up with criteria in a software program that judges art. I think that's amazing, or maybe I'm missing something. Perhaps it's just a participation award. ;-)a

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7053/13381875073_33296be1a0_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/movB​f2] (external link)The Blues in Black-and-White {Explore} (external link) by ·tlc∙ (external link), on Flickr

Tom C. | 7D | 7D MkII |Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 10-22, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L, Σ 30 1.4, 85 1.8, railroad tracks and cornfields
Image Editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
BrandonSi's Avatar
Joined Sep 2004
Chicago
Dec 03, 2014 13:03 |  #307

tshred wrote in post #17308730external link
My question is, since there is no group of people selecting Explored photos, can a machine really determine what is a good photograph? If you look at the top 100 or so Explored pics on any day, there are some truly remarkable ones. Somehow they came up with criteria in a software program that judges art. I think that's amazing, or maybe I'm missing something. Perhaps it's just a participation award. ;-)a

It's not so much judging art, a BIG portion of the algorithm is based on people's reactions to the image (# of favorites, how many views, # of comments, all of that elapsed over a series of time frames.. EXIF and location data, etc..)


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

LOG IN TO REPLY
WhyFi
Goldmember
WhyFi's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
Post has been last edited over 3 years ago by WhyFi. 2 edits done in total.
Dec 03, 2014 13:10 |  #308

tshred wrote in post #17308730 (external link)
My question is, since there is no group of people selecting Explored photos, can a machine really determine what is a good photograph? If you look at the top 100 or so Explored pics on any day, there are some truly remarkable ones. Somehow they came up with criteria in a software program that judges art. I think that's amazing, or maybe I'm missing something. Perhaps it's just a participation award. ;-)a


It's an algorithm that's largely based on the activity of Flickr viewers. It looks at more than a few factors, including:

  • What kind of activity your photo is seeing (views, favorites, comments)

  • Where these views/favorites/commen​ts are coming from aka what groups your photo is in. The more precise, the better - Minnesota Travel is more precise than... I dunno, a group dedicated to a certain camera body. Also, being in more than 5 groups is supposedly a detriment to being Explored and (what I would call) the attention seeking groups (Post 1, Comment on 5!!1!) groups no longer weigh so heavily as they once did.

  • How descriptive your tags and description are (it seems like the more wordy you are, the more likely you are to be Explored, but I'm not clear on whether this is directly figured in to the algorithm or if this is because it drives search results and increases views/favs/comments)

    Gaming the system isn't as easy as it once was, but it's still not hard: fav a lot of photos and follow a lot of users in the hopes that they will reciprocate, be wordy, take halfway decent photos.

    edit: to keep the thread on-topic, here's one of mine -

    IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2896/14203558140_efd4f17485_b.jpg
    [IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/nD7W​Zs] (external link)

    Bowing for Tips (external link) by heightsfidelity (external link), on Flickr

  • Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    Harm
    . . . overboard with the tea . . .
    Harm's Avatar
    48,564 posts
    Gallery: 13 photos
    Joined Jan 2008
    Dec 03, 2014 13:13 as a reply to WhyFi's post |  #309

    I tend not to add any tags, or a description other than my homepage, and I don't enter my photo into any groups. Yet some still get into explore.

    Crazy?


    SmugMugexternal link

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    WhyFi
    Goldmember
    WhyFi's Avatar
    Joined Apr 2008
    I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
    Dec 03, 2014 13:20 |  #310

    Harm wrote in post #17308798 (external link)
    I tend not to add any tags, or a description other than my homepage, and I don't enter my photo into any groups. Yet some still get into explore.

    Crazy?

    No, not crazy, doing the aforementioned increases your odds, but being Explored isn't dependent upon it. I think that there's a LOT of leeway built in, but I'm not exactly sure how. This shot, for example, was not much more than a snapshot, but it's still in Explore for the day that it was uploaded, with only 11 favs and 2 comments and it's in "too many" groups. Very weird to me.

    IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3934/15608944435_b1c6ef9f3e_b.jpg
    [IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pMiV​nD] (external link)
    Pumpkin Pie (external link) by heightsfidelity (external link), on Flickr

    Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    pulsar123
    Goldmember
    Joined Apr 2010
    Canada
    Dec 04, 2014 19:06 |  #311

    I actually did quite a bit of web mining and processing of the explored photos data from Flickr a few years back, to better understand the algorithm. (I basically downloaded all the metadata - number of views, likes, groups, current total number of photos in those groups, for every explored photo every day.) At that time, it looked like

    - the more likes / views / comments your photo gets, the better the chance to be explored (as expected);
    - if you post in more than one group, you have to divide your views likes etc by the number of the groups, so if you are a member of a few groups it makes sense to post only in one - the one which is the most active, or otherwise your stats will be watered down;
    - huge number of groups are banned from explore (usually the ones who force you to comment/fave other photos if you post your; or the groups designed to game the explore algorithm) - so don't post in those!
    - other, most obvious (larger) groups give a very small chance to get to explore (because the photostream moves so fast, and per photo these groups actually have very low activity);
    - the most successful groups are usually small ones, where you know many other members (through their photos there); also groups who only allow posting on a certain day of the week seem to be the most explore-friendly;
    - if somebody faves/comments on your photo, and then you fave/comment back his/her today's photo, you nullify both his/her faves and yours, so don't do that. The better strategy is instead to simply be very active one of those one-day-a-week groups, commenting / faving all the nice photos on that day - and one day they will start doing that to you as well.

    I used this strategy successfully to get 15 of my photos to explore (highest position #24).


    6D, Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, Laowa 15mm 1:1 macro, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    cutwater
    Goldmember
    cutwater's Avatar
    Joined Sep 2009
    near Saratoga Springs, NY
    Dec 04, 2014 19:12 |  #312

    pulsar123 wrote in post #17312357external link
    I actually did quite a bit of web mining and processing of the explored photos data from Flickr a few years back, to better understand the algorithm. (I basically downloaded all the metadata - number of views, likes, groups, current total number of photos in those groups, for every explored photo every day.) At that time, it looked like

    - the more likes / views / comments your photo gets, the better the chance to be explored (as expected);
    - if you post in more than one group, you have to divide your views likes etc by the number of the groups, so if you are a member of a few groups it makes sense to post only in one - the one which is the most active, or otherwise your stats will be watered down;
    - huge number of groups are banned from explore (usually the ones who force you to comment/fave other photos if you post your; or the groups designed to game the explore algorithm) - so don't post in those!
    - other, most obvious (larger) groups give a very small chance to get to explore (because the photostream moves so fast, and per photo these groups actually have very low activity);
    - the most successful groups are usually small ones, where you know many other members (through their photos there); also groups who only allow posting on a certain day of the week seem to be the most explore-friendly;
    - if somebody faves/comments on your photo, and then you fave/comment back his/her today's photo, you nullify both his/her faves and yours, so don't do that. The better strategy is instead to simply be very active one of those one-day-a-week groups, commenting / faving all the nice photos on that day - and one day they will start doing that to you as well.

    I used this strategy successfully to get 15 of my photos to explore (highest position #24).

    Interesting observations, thank you for sharing!


    Websiteexternal link flickrexternal link 500pxexternal link FaceBookexternal link

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    mystik610
    Cream of the Crop
    mystik610's Avatar
    Joined Jan 2012
    Houston, TX
    Dec 05, 2014 05:31 |  #313

    IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3880/14600308322_fe499cc37d_b.jpg
    [IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ofbo​ZQ] (external link)Rainbow in the burbs (external link) by Carlo Alcala (external link), on Flickr

    focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
    α7ʀII - RX1ʀII - α9 - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sony/Zeiss 35 f1.4 ZA - 85GM - Sony 70-200GM

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    garryknight
    Goldmember
    garryknight's Avatar
    2,576 posts
    Joined Mar 2008
    London, UK
    Dec 05, 2014 05:36 |  #314

    This one got into Explore and got a total of 24,209 views on the 22nd of November, and I have absolutely no idea why. It was just a quick snapshot as I was passing that I thought might make an OK stock photo.

    IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7521/15657882247_004bf81f4e_c.jpg
    [IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pRCJ​T2] (external link)Electrician (external link) by garryknight (external link), on Flickr

    Garry Knight
    http://www.flickr.com/​photos/garryknight/ (external link)
    Samsung NX2000 CSC, 20-50mm kit lens, 50-200mm OIS; Nikon D5100, AF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR, AF-S 55-200mm f/4-5.6 ED VR, AF-S 50mm f/1.8G; plus a Sony DSC-HX60V, a Canon SX220 HS compact, a Galaxy Camera and a Lumia 930 cameraphone

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    FarmerTed1971
    fondling the 5D4
    FarmerTed1971's Avatar
    Joined Sep 2013
    Portland, OR
    Dec 06, 2014 10:42 |  #315

    Just this morning... going viral and I'm loving every second of it...

    IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7532/15764846947_9a01be927b_b.jpg
    [IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q25X​KZ] (external link)Tilikum Crossing (external link) by FarmerTed1971 (external link), on Flickr

    Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

    LOG IN TO REPLY
    sponsored links
    (this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

    111,706 views & 257 likes for this thread
    Post your Flickr Explored images!
    FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries


    Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
    Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


    AAA

    Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

    COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

    POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
    made in Finland
    by Pekka Saarinen
    for photography-on-the.net
    Spent 0.00303 for 6 database queries.
    PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.08s
    Latest registered member is MarthaBennett
    918 guests, 432 members online
    Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016