Image was taken in 1996 with a Nikon F4 in an Aquatica underwater housing. I believe the lens was a Nikkor 14mm.
cerett Senior Member 802 posts Likes: 149 Joined Jun 2013 Location: Santa Ana, California More info       | Jan 12, 2015 16:03 | #1 Image was taken in 1996 with a Nikon F4 in an Aquatica underwater housing. I believe the lens was a Nikkor 14mm. Marty
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itw Goldmember ![]() More info Post edited over 3 years ago by itw.       | Jan 12, 2015 16:58 | #2 Much as I dislike the expression, I'll use it here. AWESOME ! You can call me Ned
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cicopo Goldmember ![]() More info       | Jan 12, 2015 17:30 | #3 Very nice. Certainly not something many of us will see while diving is it? A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cerett THREAD STARTER Senior Member 802 posts Likes: 149 Joined Jun 2013 Location: Santa Ana, California More info       | Thank you. I was really into wreck diving at the time. The deck is at 150 feet. I don't know how it or any of the other ships in Truk Lagoon look today Marty
LOG IN TO REPLY |
seaninsa Goldmember 1,532 posts Likes: 219 Joined Sep 2011 More info Post edited over 3 years ago by seaninsa.       | Jan 14, 2015 01:14 | #5 That is one of my favorite dives. To bad unless you are a tech diver you have a very short bottom time. I believe my bottom time was 15 mins with a 35 min deco commitment.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cerett THREAD STARTER Senior Member 802 posts Likes: 149 Joined Jun 2013 Location: Santa Ana, California More info       | Yeah. My deepest dive there was 180 feet. All on regular air. Crazy. I spent around 10 minutes at that depth and 45 minutes coming to the surface. My local guide carried an extra tank. Marty
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EveryMilesAMemory Goldmember ![]() More info       | Jan 14, 2015 13:06 | #7 This is amazing. I'd have this image framed as large as possible! Pat Bonish
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maxshafiq Member ![]() 85 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2015 Location: Tampa, USA More info       | Sep 21, 2015 12:01 | #8 Great underwater show...takes you back in time!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
duhgster Member ![]() 31 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2015 Location: Napa More info       | Sep 21, 2015 12:30 | #9 I like the image a lot. A great framing and content.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cruncher75 Hatchling 4 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info       | Oct 01, 2015 03:40 | #10 Love it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Feb 01, 2017 08:02 | #11 Very interesting stuff. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Littleoldman Member ![]() 201 posts Likes: 20 Joined Sep 2011 More info       | Feb 03, 2017 13:24 | #12 Beautiful Shot
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Feb 23, 2017 12:07 | #13 Great shot. Canon 7D Mark2 gripped,Canon 6D gripped, Canon 60d gripped,EF 70/200 F2.8 L IS 11 USM EF-100-400 F4-5.6L IS II EF 50 f1.8 ,EF 100 2.8 usm ,EFS18-135, EF 24-105 F4 L usm ,Tamron 70-300 SP 4_5.6 Sigma 150-500 , Manfrotto 190x prob with a Jobu jr.3 , Manfrotto 681b monopod. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arch-vandelay Member 30 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2017 More info       | Feb 26, 2017 03:12 | #14 Great shot! How deep were you when you took this? Was the light from above enough?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
seaninsa Goldmember 1,532 posts Likes: 219 Joined Sep 2011 More info       | The deck is at 165ft. I dove this one time. It is a great dive. You have 15 mins of bottom time roughly and 45 mins of deco.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in |
| ||
Latest registered member is HBGPhotos 833 guests, 441 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017 |