Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support
Thread started 04 Feb 2015 (Wednesday) 17:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

70-200 f/4 tripod Collar, Is OEM / Canon rock solid?

 
JJD.Photography
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Toronto
Feb 04, 2015 17:20 |  #1

I recently purchased a 3rd party tripod collar from Amazon for my newly acquired 70-200 f/4. The collar supports the lens as it's supposed to do, but overall I am not happy with it. From time to time I bracket shots using the 2 second delay. This results in images that are not aligned. Today was the final straw when this plastic POS captured a blurry single shot due to movement. Also, the screw knob and motion of turning it feels really cheap and the rotation from horizontal to vertical is never smooth. Minor gripes I know, but using the 2.8 for years it's very noticeable.

How is the OEM f/4 collar? Is it rock solid like the 2.8? I own the 2.8 and never had any of the issues mentioned above. I don't mind spending the $100+ on the OEM f/4 collar IF it's rock solid like the 2.8.

At this point, the f/4 back is back in the Pelican and I will just deal with the extra weight of the 2.8 until I get feedback.

Thanks for any information


His And Her Photographs (external link)
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
blanex1
Senior Member
blanex1's Avatar
790 posts
Joined Nov 2012
Feb 05, 2015 20:32 |  #2

i have never had that f/4 but i own the 70-200 2.8 version one and the collar is real solid as i think the OEM is built much stronger then any or should i say most 3rd party collars out there !


canon 7d bg-e7 5d-mk3 1d-mk3 24-105-L 17-40 L 35/1.4 85/1.8 yougnuo 565 ex 580 ex and lots of other canon stuff.canon 70-200 2.8 L

LOG IN TO REPLY
stevecan
Member
Joined Apr 2013
The sunny south
Feb 06, 2015 08:51 |  #3

I know you asked about the OEM collar, which I don't have, but I can speak favorably about the Vello $50 @ BH Photo http://www.bhphotovide​o.com ...A_Black.html/prm/al​sVwDtlexternal link. It does everything I would expect it to do. I have taken many sharp shots from it, even has the sightmark for landscape vs portrait orientation. The only small gripe I have is the screw to tighten it is Knurled, but not lobed like the OEM. I've never felt like it wouldn't get tight enough, and it seems really well built. It even has the lining to protect the lens from being scratched. It probably requires stronger finger tips to tighten properly than OEM though.

Just my experience so far,

Steve


Gear: Canon 60D, 70-200mm F4L USM, 50mm MkII F1.8, 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS STM, Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary, Vanguard Alta Pro 264AT tripod, Vanguard SBS-100 head.
My Flickr photostream http://www.flickr.com/​photos/109443493@N02/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
greenjeans
Goldmember
greenjeans's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
Greenville, SC
Feb 18, 2015 19:24 |  #4

I agree with Steve. I have a Canon and a Vello and would never spend the extra for the Canon.


Gripped 6D, gripped 70D, gripped T3i, 24-105 F4L, 50mm 1.8, 55-250mm, 18-135mm, 60mm EF-S macro, 70-200 F4L IS, 400mm F5.6L, 18-55mm IS STM, Canon 85mm 1.8, Sigma 150-600mm C., Sigma 100-400mm C, Samyang 8mm 3.5 fisheye

LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonuser123
Senior Member
Canonuser123's Avatar
Joined Dec 2014
Southern California
Feb 18, 2015 21:09 |  #5

I have the Canon one on my 70-200 f4 L IS and yes it is solid, I have never had any problems with it other than I thought it should have come with the lens.


Sony α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Canon EOS 7D Mark II, EOS M3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 | Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG Aspherical, 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C | Tokina AT-X 124 AF Pro DX 12-24mm f/4 | Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical [IF] Macro | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM, EF-M 22mm f/2 STM | Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH. POWER OIS / H-FS14140E | Sony DT 16-105mm f/3.5-5.6 | Samyang 16mm F2.0 ED AS UMC CS | Canon Speedlite 380 EX | Yongnuo YN-560-II

LOG IN TO REPLY
corndog ­ cabernet
Senior Member
corndog cabernet's Avatar
Joined May 2010
State of chaos
Feb 19, 2015 02:04 |  #6

Canonuser123 wrote in post #17438409external link
I have the Canon one on my 70-200 f4 L IS and yes it is solid, I have never had any problems with it other than I thought it should have come with the lens.

Same here.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Xyclopx
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2008
San Jose, CA
Post has been edited over 2 years ago by Xyclopx.
Feb 25, 2015 09:40 |  #7

JJD.Photography wrote in post #17415536external link
I recently purchased a 3rd party tripod collar from Amazon for my newly acquired 70-200 f/4. The collar supports the lens as it's supposed to do, but overall I am not happy with it. From time to time I bracket shots using the 2 second delay. This results in images that are not aligned. Today was the final straw when this plastic POS captured a blurry single shot due to movement. Also, the screw knob and motion of turning it feels really cheap and the rotation from horizontal to vertical is never smooth. Minor gripes I know, but using the 2.8 for years it's very noticeable.

might not be entirely a problem with the collar. if your tripod sucks sometimes even footsteps of others on the same cement sidewalk can cause shake on telephotos, or even the tiniest of breezes. buying my huge rrs 3-series tripod was one of the best investments in image quality i have ever made despite costing more than many lenses. that thing is rock solid, and if i see blur i know it's cause i screwed up.

EDIT: nm, i just reread and saw that you said everything is fine with your 2.8, so i guess it must be the collar.


Dean Chiang (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear (external link)
My Photos (external link)
Instagram @xyclopx (external link) @feetandeyes (external link) @gastramour (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
JJD.Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,409 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Toronto
Feb 25, 2015 10:03 |  #8

I found a good deal on an OEM Canon collar from ebay. Night and day difference between the plastic collar and the Canon one. Feels just as solid as my 2.8 now! Thanks for all the feedback.

As for the tripod, I'm also using a RRS 3 series ;-)a


His And Her Photographs (external link)
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scotter
Member
Scotter's Avatar
245 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Winnipeg, Canada
Mar 03, 2015 09:38 |  #9

For my 70-200 f/4 I use the collar off my 400 f5.6, fits and works perfect.




LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
Cream of the Crop
msowsun's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
Oakville Ont. Canada
Post has been last edited over 2 years ago by msowsun. 2 edits done in total.
Mar 03, 2015 12:07 |  #10

Scotter wrote in post #17458437 (external link)
For my 70-200 f/4 I use the collar off my 400 f5.6, fits and works perfect.

Yes the Tripod Mount A(W), A(B), A II (W), and A II (B) are all interchangeable and all of them fit the 70-200mm 4.0L, 70-200mm 4.0L IS, 200mm 2.8L, 300mm 4.0L, 400mm 5.6L, 80-200mm 2.8L

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Mike Sowsun / S110 / SL1 / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 18-135mm STM / EF-S 55-250mm STM
5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.8 STM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS /
EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Jon's Avatar
69,628 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Bethesda, MD USA
Mar 03, 2015 16:05 as a reply to msowsun's post |  #11

300 f/4 L IS takes the B ring, same as (among others) the 70-200 2.8 IS L I and 100-400 L I. Or were you speaking of the older 300 f/4 non-IS?


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
Cream of the Crop
msowsun's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
Oakville Ont. Canada
Mar 03, 2015 16:35 as a reply to Jon's post |  #12

Yes, the older EF 300 f/4 (non-IS) uses the "A" tripod ring.


Mike Sowsun / S110 / SL1 / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 18-135mm STM / EF-S 55-250mm STM
5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.8 STM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS /
EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,512 views & 0 likes for this thread
70-200 f/4 tripod Collar, Is OEM / Canon rock solid?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00798 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.07s
Latest registered member is mrmoses
839 guests, 363 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016