Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands
Thread started 11 Feb 2015 (Wednesday) 09:09
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon to Sony

 
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,875 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Feb 24, 2015 20:42 |  #16

I just bought a used Sony Alpha 7 and $20 FD adapter. I'm pleased as punch with its size and image quality. My 5Dii does a bit better with noise and resolution, but the Sony has about 2 stops more of dynamic range. I doubt I'll use my 5Dii much anymore, except in the studio.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
EverydayGetaway's Avatar
9,769 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2012
Bowie, MD
Feb 24, 2015 22:18 |  #17

Tony-S wrote in post #17448310external link
I just bought a used Sony Alpha 7 and $20 FD adapter. I'm pleased as punch with its size and image quality. My 5Dii does a bit better with noise and resolution, but the Sony has about 2 stops more of dynamic range. I doubt I'll use my 5Dii much anymore, except in the studio.

The 5Dii has 3mp less resolution than the a7....


Fuji X-Pro2 // Fuji X-T1 // Fuji X-100T // XF 18mm f2 // Rokinon 12mm f2 // XF 35mm f1.4 // Rokinon 21mm f1.4 // XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 // XF 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 // Rokinon 85mm f1.4 // Zhonghi Lensturbo ii // Various adapted MF lenses
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,875 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Feb 24, 2015 22:51 |  #18

EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17448454external link
The 5Dii has 3mp less resolution than the a7....

There's more to resolving power than than pixel count. The a7 has 2650 lines of resolution vs 2820 lines of resolution for the 5Dii.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
EverydayGetaway's Avatar
9,769 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2012
Bowie, MD
Feb 25, 2015 01:24 |  #19

Tony-S wrote in post #17448514external link
There's more to resolving power than than pixel count. The a7 has 2650 lines of resolution vs 2820 lines of resolution for the 5Dii.

I'd be willing to bet that neither you nor your clients would be able to tell the difference between a print from either.


Fuji X-Pro2 // Fuji X-T1 // Fuji X-100T // XF 18mm f2 // Rokinon 12mm f2 // XF 35mm f1.4 // Rokinon 21mm f1.4 // XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 // XF 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 // Rokinon 85mm f1.4 // Zhonghi Lensturbo ii // Various adapted MF lenses
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,875 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Post has been last edited over 2 years ago by Tony-S. 3 edits done in total.
Feb 25, 2015 07:58 |  #20

EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17448688external link
I'd be willing to bet that neither you nor your clients would be able to tell the difference between a print from either.

I didn't say otherwise. In fact, you could say the same thing about an 8 mpix camera, too, depending on the print size. I just pointed out that the 5Dii outresolves the Sony Alpha 7 and corrected your assertion that more pixels means higher resolution.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
DagoImaging's Avatar
Joined Nov 2012
Feb 25, 2015 17:06 |  #21

Well, I made the switch.

A7ii and A6000 along w/ the 16-50PZ on the a6000 and the 24-70Z/4 and 70-200G/4.

I love the size and weight difference of this system. I'll eventually add some primes to the bag but also in other mounts w/ adapters. Love the image quality I've seen out of them already and will test out more this weekend.


Sony a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / Sony HVL-60M

LOG IN TO REPLY
bikfoto
Alexander the Wannabe
bikfoto's Avatar
420 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 25, 2015 17:19 |  #22

You have to try the 55 1.8 Zeiss. It looks like the sharpest lens DxO has ever tested!


bikfotoexternal link
Need a WEBSITE?external link
Gear & Feedback
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kkcy
Member
59 posts
Joined Apr 2014
Feb 25, 2015 21:44 |  #23

Made the switch from 6D to A7 primarily for the weight benefit and the ability to use cheaper, legacy lens. Hopefully I won't regret it!




LOG IN TO REPLY
samsen
Cream of the Crop
samsen's Avatar
7,468 posts
Joined Apr 2006
LA
Feb 25, 2015 21:47 |  #24

Not sure between a Sony FF mirrorless or Canon 135mmL which one is going to make me lose wallet weight, sooner!


Weak retaliates,
Strong Forgives,
Intelligent Ignores!
Samsen
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Super ­ Secret
Member
48 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Feb 27, 2015 15:56 |  #25

I've been shooting with the Canon 6D and A7 for a few months now. Interesting combo. The A7 offers great dynamic range and is really light, but the 6D does better at higher ISOs.


Flickr (external link)
Canon 6D, Sony A7, 15mm f/2.8, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Canon 40mm f/2.8, Canon 50mm f/1.8, Sigma 85mm f/1.4, Canon 135mm F/2.0L, manual lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Goldmember
LeeRatters's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
Bristol, UK
Feb 28, 2015 11:34 |  #26

This is a quite informative read. I'm thinking of swapping myself.

I have a 5D2. I have a 17-40L, 28/2.8, 50/1.4 & 135L but I mainly seem to shoot with manual C/Y & M42 lenses. I use the 17-40L very rarely, the 135L quite rarely, the 50/1.4 the most & the 28/1.8 for landscapes.

I don't shoot motorsports, I don't shoot sports, I don't shoot wildlife. Mainly days out, the kids, landscapes/coastal, general urban wandering..... Take a look here - https://www.flickr.com​/photos/ratters445/external link

I'm thinking maybe the A7 or possibly A7s would suit me but how much do I need to budget for EF, C/Y & M42 adapters too on top of the cost of the Sony body??


>> Flickr <<external link


LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,492 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Feb 28, 2015 12:03 as a reply to LeeRatters's post |  #27

EF adapter, 60-100 third party + flock paper $30

CY/M42 adapters 10-20 a pop.

A7 mod, $400 if using short flange lenses like M mount.


Sony A7r - A7ii - A7rii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CY 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
cvt01
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2008
Post has been edited over 2 years ago by cvt01.
Feb 28, 2015 12:47 |  #28

Here is what I did and recommend to try... Before I made the switch I wanted a test run so I picked up a used Sony A7 for 800 bucks. Barely used, shuttercount was 3500... Then I picked up a cheap manual EF-NEX adapter (25ish from Fotodiox). So for 825 I was able to test the system with my EF lenses, although wide open only, no aperture setting. If I hated it I was able to sell it in 5 minutes for 750... the fact is I don't, I absolutely love it. I shoot the sony more than I did the canons simply because I can take it everywhere and it is not a hassle. I came from a 1Ds and a 1Ds II combo which I got tired carrying around...
Since then I picked up a Canon Fd 55 1.2 non aspherical for $220, an Olympus Zuiko MC 28 f/2 for $190 and my favorite the Konica 40 f/1.8 for 60 bucks.
I'm in love with the EVF. This thing is insane. You can literally see the DOF and the bokeh in the electrical viewfinder (my old cameras did not even have live view). I set the camera to Auto ISO (limit to 3200 or 6400), I manually adjust shutterspeed (depending on focal length and subject) and I set the aperture on the lens picking the DOF I want. I can see how it changes by turning the aperture ring on the lens (the viewfinder brightness stays constant to a point as the camera increases the ISO for me). There is a dedicated exposure compensation dial on it so I can adjust "brightness" to my liking. When I push the shutter button the live view I'm looking at freezes and that is my picture (with a little bit of lag of course). DONE. I was blown away when I first learned this...

For the battery life concern: the 1Ds and 1Ds II shared the same battery at 325g. The 1Ds II was able to do 800-1200 shots on a freshly (!) charged battery but I always had to take at least one extra just in case. So that is 325g extra weight. The Sony A7 aftermarket Wasabi battery ($20 a pair charger included) is 42g so I can take 5 of it and still be ahead of the Canon monster weight-wise.

All that being said I had a hard time tweaking the colors to my liking. I think I found a good setting which gives me colors I like but I miss the Canon colors. My Canon bodies are so old that I'm keeping them just in case.

This was taken with the 135L wide open manual focus (the full size version is also available on flickr for pixel peeping):

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8612/16588012446_da37ab63a0_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rgPU​bA] (external link)Sony A7 Canon 135L (external link) by cvt01 (external link), on Flickr

This is for gearheads, I took pictures of the camera with all the lenses I own:
https://www.flickr.com ...4/sets/721576506433​20611/ (external link)

Seriously... 800 bucks for a year or so old full-frame camera... how cool is that??? :D

Peter
flickr (external link)
1Ds I, 1Ds II, Rokinon 14, Canon 135L,
Sony A7, Zeiss 35 1.4 ZA, Minolta MD 35 f2.8, Konica 40 f1.8, Konica 50 f1.7, Voigtlander Nokton 50 f1.1, Takumar 55 f1.8, Helios 44-2, Minolta MD 135 f3.5

LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Goldmember
LeeRatters's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
Bristol, UK
Mar 01, 2015 12:28 as a reply to Charlie's post |  #29

Thank you for the comments.

Do people have actual recommendations for adapters that they have used or do use please? There seem to be so many out there with differing reviews.

I'd need

EF > Sony E
C/Y > Sony E
M42 > Sony E [although I do have a M42 > C/Y so I guess I could get around that one]

Used A7 seems to go for about £640 here [cheapest] bought privately/eBay.


>> Flickr <<external link


LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,875 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Mar 01, 2015 12:42 |  #30

I only have a Fotodiox FD adapter for my a7. My M42 lenses simply cannot compete with the FD in terms of IQ and color, especially at wider apertures. I had three C/Y Zeiss lenses at one time (28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.7, 135mm f/2.8) and they were all very good, too, but not any better than the Canons I have in that group (24mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/2).


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

10,354 views & 4 likes for this thread
Canon to Sony
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00319 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.15s
Latest registered member is lookingglassphoto
1048 guests, 523 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016