Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 15 Sep 2014 (Monday) 11:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!

 
TeleFragger
Goldmember
TeleFragger's Avatar
3,155 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Williamstown, NJ
Mar 09, 2015 09:44 |  #4201

Stunning stuff guys!

mine was ordered just minutes ago. Wasnt able to get funds for 70-200 2.8 so will unfortunately have to utilize my 55-250 for now till I can get one.
I am going to a store today to see if i can sell off my t2i, grip, batteries, flash, rf603 triggers and get a 50-500 he has had in the store for EVER....non OS version.


GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse (external link)****RF-603 Discussion
Canon 7Dm2 Gripped | 32GB Transcend CF | 32GB Eye Fi Mobi SD | YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8| Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
RodS57
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2014
Mar 09, 2015 10:38 |  #4202

John Sheehy wrote in post #17466958 (external link)
A larger sensor has the potential for a higher quality image, but that requires certain conditions, such as using a shallow DOF not possible on the smaller format, using the entire sensor or most of it (a larger area of it compared to the smaller sensor), or using a lens that is not optimized for the smaller format. However, that is not always the case. For example, I think I get a sharper image with about the same noise with my 7D2 and 17-55/2.8 IS at 17/2.8 as my 6D with the 24-105/4 at 24/4.

There we go; that is exactly what I was talking about. The 6D has no greater usable ISO range than the 7D2 for shooting BIFs with the same lens, distance, and shutter speed. ISO is not some blanket noise penalty on anything you do with a capture. The whole idea of the question "what is the highest usable ISO?" on a camera is absurd, IMO. ISO has no direct relationship to noise; what must also be factored in is how much the final display of the subject is going to be magnified, relative to the size captured on the sensor, in inches or millimeters. The larger sensors generally are only "usable" at higher ISOs because you can make the subject larger on the sensor, by using a longer focal length. You can not claim this benefit when you are already too far away from the subject and are focal length limited. An 8x10 inch sensor will not help you get better "IQ" of a subject at a certain distance, with a certain lens. You have to make your composition fill the frame to get the benefit.

IMO, if you really want to understand your choices, you have to think in terms of resolution and noise per unit of sensor area, just like film has certain qualities based on emulsion, regardless of film size. Blanket statements about larger sensors having better high ISO performance do not mean that they have better "film"; they just have a bigger "sheet" of it, which is of zero value if you don't use a bigger piece of the "film". What you do get, however, is more jump or jitter room on the sensor, so you will have less birds without heads and without feet if you can't follow the bird well, at the cost of less pixels on the subject with the larger pxiels of current FF cameras.

Well, the 5D3 has compromises compared to both the 6D and 7D2. The 5D3 has more banding noise than either; this shows up in the shadows of very low ISOs, especially at ISO 250 with HTP (highlight tone priority) and an f-ratio of 2 or less. Neither shoot as fast as the 7D2, and the 7D2 has better noise character than the 5D3, and has less visible noise in FLL (focal-length-limited) situations. The 7D2 is superior to the 5D3 in practical DR at base ISO; the 5D3's banding ruins the DR. The 5D3, however is the fastest-focusing FF camera Canon makes short of the 1Dx, which costs more than 2x as much as the 5D3.

You see, Canon doesn't make things simple and just make one camera completely better than another, as if you just had to chose between budget and quality; you need all three cameras to get everything the three of them collectively offer!

I think you're right about that. It is way too easy to turn a (technical) turd of an image into a gem when images are displayed small. Small images can hide the noise, the noise created in sharpening and boosting contrast or levels, and make a soft image look sharp by pixelating it and substituting the gridded pixel boundaries for natural subject edges. I feel embarrassed for people who wet their pants over the "sharpness" of 1/2 MP or smaller web images. You can take a shot with a 75-300/5.6 USM and two 2x TCs stacked and make a sharp web image out of it! Same with ISOs; unless a camera has serious banding noise issues, you can make any ISO a camera officially sports look fairly noiseless by using NR and/or reducing its display size enough.

Can I plead no contest now? :-)

I did my best to explain my statements. I do not have the experience, technical knowledge or access to hardware to go any further.

FWIW I chose the 7D2 over the 6D for the focus system and speed. In hindsight this was a mistake as my 7D2 couldn't take a sharp picture of the Goodyear blimp at 100 feet.

Rod


>>> Pictures? What pictures? <<<<

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
2,210 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Mar 09, 2015 11:08 |  #4203

RodS57 wrote in post #17467292 (external link)
FWIW I chose the 7D2 over the 6D for the focus system and speed. In hindsight this was a mistake as my 7D2 couldn't take a sharp picture of the Goodyear blimp at 100 feet.

Maybe your 7D2 needs an micro-AF adjustment for your lens. Something as slow as a blimp shouldn't provide much of a challenge, especially in AIServo mode.




LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
MedicineMan4040's Avatar
Joined Jul 2013
Mar 09, 2015 13:32 |  #4204

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7606/16580985719_789005729f_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rgcT​o8] (external link)A Proud one is He (external link) by MedicineMan4040 (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Pondrader's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
Minden, Ontario, Canada
Mar 09, 2015 13:54 |  #4205

Nice One MedicineMan


Jeff ........7D Mark II, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
MedicineMan4040's Avatar
Joined Jul 2013
Mar 09, 2015 15:51 |  #4206

Thanks Pondrader :)
I might as well call this mockingbird 'brother'. He's been with me since the first day I built the 'bird studio'.
Funny how he dominates the area, only bird that will drive him away (other than the hawks of course) are the crows.
He even stands tall to groups of starlings....


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
RodS57
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2014
Mar 09, 2015 20:13 |  #4207

John Sheehy wrote in post #17467334 (external link)
Maybe your 7D2 needs an micro-AF adjustment for your lens. Something as slow as a blimp shouldn't provide much of a challenge, especially in AIServo mode.

We're going off topic here. If you are interested you can check out my posts on the 7D Mark II - Focus Issues thread.

And yes, I do appreciate the feedback.

Rod


>>> Pictures? What pictures? <<<<

LOG IN TO REPLY
hummingbird
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2007
North Carolina, USA
Mar 09, 2015 21:25 as a reply to post 17467059 |  #4208

Both are great shots. The Galah is my favorite.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Pondrader's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
Minden, Ontario, Canada
Mar 09, 2015 21:34 |  #4209

A little friend

Cuite aint he


IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8566/16770698255_2204df9f86_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rxYd​iV] (external link)IMG_9447-3 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr

Jeff ........7D Mark II, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
garciarf
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2012
Central Ohio
Mar 09, 2015 22:53 |  #4210

More than anything, I love the LV AF capabilities of the camera.

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7646/16759372742_5e1d3a7c9d_z.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rwYa​Cs] (external link)Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-700 N727SW KCMH 08MAR15 (external link) by FelipeGR90 (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8740/16759373322_0b6d2f4aba_z.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rwYa​Ns] (external link)Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-700 N221WN KCMH 08MAR15 (external link) by FelipeGR90 (external link), on Flickr

Felipe G
EOS 1Ds, 1D Mark III, 7D, XT. 18-55, 70-200 f4L, 28-135, 28-70 f2.8L, 40mm 2.8, Tokina 12-24, Sigma 80-400 OS, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, 1.4x Extender III.
My Gallery: http://fgrphoto.smugmu​g.com/external link
My Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
MedicineMan4040's Avatar
Joined Jul 2013
Mar 10, 2015 03:19 |  #4211

Pondrader that is OVER THE TOP!!!!
I bet its via the new lens too :)


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ancientone80
Senior Member
ancientone80's Avatar
Joined Aug 2013
Perth, Western Australia
Mar 10, 2015 03:38 |  #4212

hummingbird wrote in post #17468166 (external link)
Both are great shots. The Galah is my favorite.

Thanks mate.

Cheers
Gus


Canon 7D II, 650D | Canon EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55/2.8, EF-S 18-135 STM, 100-400L IS II, 70-200L IS II, 50/1.4, 100/2.8 IS Macro | Canon MT-24EX, Speedlite 600EX-RT
Image Editing Ok..
See more at my Flicker site :) flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ancientone80
Senior Member
ancientone80's Avatar
Joined Aug 2013
Perth, Western Australia
Mar 10, 2015 03:40 |  #4213

Pondrader wrote in post #17468178 (external link)
A little friend

Cuite aint he


QUOTED IMAGE
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rxYd​iV] (external link)IMG_9447-3 (external link) by Jeff Manser (external link), on Flickr

Wow Jeff, these are as good as the foxes, I don't know what it is, but the way your setup/PP renders fur is just fantastic.

Cheers
Gus


Canon 7D II, 650D | Canon EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55/2.8, EF-S 18-135 STM, 100-400L IS II, 70-200L IS II, 50/1.4, 100/2.8 IS Macro | Canon MT-24EX, Speedlite 600EX-RT
Image Editing Ok..
See more at my Flicker site :) flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
Joined May 2011
Gainesville, Florida
Post has been edited over 2 years ago by Phoenixkh.
Mar 10, 2015 06:12 |  #4214

I was out last week but had a disappointing day.... not much happening. At the one Osprey nests, the eggs were laid a few days before and the lady was keeping them warm.... making lots of noises but was mostly out of sight. The Dad was off fishing. I did see him for a few seconds but didn't get any decent photographs of him. I'll head back in a few weeks after the eggs hatch.

This one was at a different nest..... with the sun pretty low. I sort of like the shadows. This one with the Canon 1.4X III.

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7653/16587786479_e187e766d9_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/rgNK​1B] (external link)Osprey in the Shadows (external link) by Phoenixkh (external link), on Flickr

Kim (the male variety) Canon 1D IV | 6Dc | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS |100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pondrader
"now I'm no rocket scientist but I do get a shot or two"
Pondrader's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
Minden, Ontario, Canada
Mar 10, 2015 09:33 |  #4215

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #17468393 (external link)
Pondrader that is OVER THE TOP!!!!
I bet its via the new lens too :)


ancientone80 wrote in post #17468413 (external link)
Wow Jeff, these are as good as the foxes, I don't know what it is, but the way your setup/PP renders fur is just fantastic.

Cheers
Gus

Thanks Guys, Im really liking the completely new camera and lens combo, Believe it or not..I forgot I had the 1.4 Extender on and shot the Pine Marten for quite a while at close range. I think they could have been just a bit sharper with less noise if I had. But Thank you for your comments,...Gus Ive been working on fur for a while now and Im glad you appreciate my effort. thank you


Jeff ........7D Mark II, 7D, 70-300L, 100-400LII
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,988,764 views & 77607 likes for this thread
-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.01667 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.12s
Latest registered member is T-Mac22
926 guests, 448 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016