Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 15 Sep 2014 (Monday) 11:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!

 
Itsed65
Goldmember
Itsed65's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
Hercules, CA
Mar 12, 2016 20:57 |  #10111

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1581/25385814420_607e14ee3a_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/EFfW​cw] (external link)
Northern Harrier #35 (external link) by lennycarl08 (external link), on Flickr

Canon 5D MK III, 5D MK IV, 7D MK II, 1D MK IV, and Fuji XT-1
My Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
NCSA197
Goldmember
NCSA197's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Western NY State
Mar 12, 2016 21:03 |  #10112

JVthePT wrote in post #17933245 (external link)
David, that is a very nice photo, is it HDR? If so, very natural and not overdone, the lighthouse jumps off of the sky blue background.

No HDR, JV (something I need to learn), just early morning after a fog burned off.


Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2012
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Mar 12, 2016 21:03 |  #10113
banned

Anyone shoot RAW + JPEG, and noticed that the JPEG does not have the entire frame in it?

I processed a RAW of my dog laying on the floor from a standing position, and noticed that, in the processed image, I could see a lot more of the tip of my shoes than in the original JPEG...


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
MedicineMan4040's Avatar
Joined Jul 2013
Mar 12, 2016 21:09 as a reply to Itsed65's post |  #10114

So intense! Awesome capture.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
MedicineMan4040's Avatar
Joined Jul 2013
Mar 12, 2016 21:57 as a reply to post 17932677 |  #10115

Beautiful work. I can never get colors like that.....nor a blue sky.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
Santa Monica, CA
Mar 12, 2016 22:45 |  #10116

IMAGE: https://julianchen.smugmug.com/Photography/Astrophotography/i-GngsVLD/0/X2/20160312-Canon%20EOS%207D%20Mark%20II-7D2_5624-X2.jpg

Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Review | "The Mighty One" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2012
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by STIC.
Mar 12, 2016 22:48 |  #10117
banned

NICE!

Just waiting for clear sky to get a moon shot with the 100-400 on my new 7DII...


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
gschlact
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2010
Chicago 'burbs
Mar 12, 2016 22:54 |  #10118

STIC wrote in post #17933400 (external link)
Anyone shoot RAW + JPEG, and noticed that the JPEG does not have the entire frame in it?

I processed a RAW of my dog laying on the floor from a standing position, and noticed that, in the processed image, I could see a lot more of the tip of my shoes than in the original JPEG...

I haven't heard of this. Is it possible you are using a program to edit the jpeg that already has edits for that same filename?




LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
31,920 posts
Gallery: 58 photos
Joined May 2002
Northern Indiana
Mar 12, 2016 22:58 |  #10119

Chances are you might have seen her on America's Got Talent? :)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
wallstreetoneil's Avatar
Joined Nov 2014
Toronto Canada
Mar 13, 2016 04:08 |  #10120

STIC wrote in post #17933400 (external link)
Anyone shoot RAW + JPEG, and noticed that the JPEG does not have the entire frame in it?

I processed a RAW of my dog laying on the floor from a standing position, and noticed that, in the processed image, I could see a lot more of the tip of my shoes than in the original JPEG...

Interesting as I can swear sometimes that when profile correction is applied in LR you lose part of the image.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2012
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Post has been last edited over 1 year ago by STIC. 3 edits done in total.
Mar 13, 2016 04:33 |  #10121
banned

gschlact wrote in post #17933501 (external link)
I haven't heard of this. Is it possible you are using a program to edit the jpeg that already has edits for that same filename?


Don't think so...

I'm just converting the RAW to a DNG, then opening the DNG with Photoshop CS3. It's the exact same process as I used with the 7D but I have never noticed this before...There is definitely more 'image' in the frame with the photoshop output JPEG than there is with the in camera JPEG (a good 10-15mm worth of shoe)...

Weird...;-)a

There also seems to be some distortion of the centre of the image in the edited output JPEG which leads to to think there is a lens profile alteration going on in the background too, but this shouldn't result in me seeing more in the pp'd image than the camera output image...or should it???


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2012
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Mar 13, 2016 04:36 |  #10122
banned

wallstreetoneil wrote in post #17933586 (external link)
Interesting as I can swear sometimes that when profile correction is applied in LR you lose part of the image.

Looks like I gained... :p


7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
STIC
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2012
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Mar 13, 2016 04:38 |  #10123
banned

In camera JPEG (set up as monochrome):

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1683/25537653272_2586d9ddc0_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/EUF9​AL] (external link)IMG_0011 (external link) by Flickr Sucks (external link), on Flickr

As output from photoshop...

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1555/25656425725_515610be7c_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/F6aT​vF] (external link)IMG_0011a (external link) by Flickr Sucks (external link), on Flickr

7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Brummel
Member
Brummel's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
Frankfurt/Main - Germany
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by Brummel.
Mar 13, 2016 05:42 |  #10124

Do you have the internal lens distortion correction enabled in your camera?
This would affect the JPG out of cam but not the RAW.
And that might be why (at the jpg) some millimeters of the frame are lost.


From
Frankfurt / Main, Germany,
Wolfram
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
wallstreetoneil's Avatar
Joined Nov 2014
Toronto Canada
Mar 13, 2016 06:42 |  #10125

Brummel wrote in post #17933603 (external link)
Do you have the internal lens distortion correction enabled in your camera?
This would affect the JPG out of cam but not the RAW.
And that might be why (at the jpg) some millimeters of the frame are lost.


This is what I was saying about profile correction - one way or another, I'm pretty sure that is what is happening - and since the picture was taken at 15mm, I'm nearly certain that is correct.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,818,032 views & 76687 likes for this thread
-= 7D2 owners unite! Discuss and post photos!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.01873 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.1s
Latest registered member is ashleyrose315
815 guests, 351 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016