Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 08 Jul 2016 (Friday) 07:08
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

All my lenses for one big one.

 
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
bildeb0rg's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
uk
Jul 08, 2016 11:06 |  #16

Tapeman wrote in post #18061284 (external link)
As much as I liked my 300, I can't imagine it being my only lens.

If you shoot to create art, I guess you could concentrate on one lens, If you want to document life's events you would be better off with more options, IMO.

absolutely on the button, but for fields sports it's a go to lens for thousands of us. absolute nightmare trying to take a team pic after a game with a 300mm lens though, you are literally across eh other side of the pitch and still yelling at everyone to "scootch in a bit":lol:




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Jul 08, 2016 11:20 as a reply to bildeb0rg's post |  #17

I still have two cameras and an 85mm 1.2 so group shots would not be a problem.

I still can't decide which is best though.


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
PCousins
Senior Member
PCousins's Avatar
Joined Nov 2014
Weston-Super-Mare (UK)
Jul 08, 2016 11:41 |  #18

When you use a 200L you will want to use it wide-open at f/2 the majority of the time which is where it comes into it's own. The images it creates are just pure class. I rarely use mine with converters and usually at f/2 only. If the focal length fits into your style and photography requirements you will be more than happy with it. They hold their price well and sell well. I live in the Uk like you and hardly see any come up for sale used, mint ones go for £3k-£3.5k. If you buy used I suggest keep an eye on mpb.com that will give you a 3 month warranty. They are a heavy lens, I notice you have a 70-200-f/2.8 II, here is a comparison in size next to my 200L (without hoods).

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,639 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Jul 09, 2016 18:52 |  #19

what a crazy question. but I love it :-P


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, 430exII, gitzo 3542, markins Q10, kirk, really right stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Jul 09, 2016 20:01 |  #20

I think you need to step back and think about how much you are giving up for one specialized lens.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
bildeb0rg's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
uk
Jul 10, 2016 02:27 |  #21

FEChariot wrote in post #18062561 (external link)
I think you need to step back and think about how much you are giving up for one specialized lens.

which he needs to shoot sports. i've used a 300L for nine years almost exclusively with 1.4x and 2.0x extenders for rugby and football, there is no substitute for reach in our game. this lens will give him the options he needs and keep some flexibility. mine and fordmondeos ideal lens would be a 400L but at nearly twice the price its almost out of reach.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopherm
Senior Member
Christopherm's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Norman, OK
Jul 10, 2016 02:50 |  #22

For indoor sports, you can't do better than the 200 f2.
I shoot a lot of volleyball, basketball and gymnastics and would feel naked without the 200 f2. Even ignoring the superior subject isolation, the extra stop of light makes it invaluable at many venues.

Of course for field sports it would pretty much require a TC. But the 300 by itself is a bit short as well.


Gear: A lot more than I deserve and a lot less than I want!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pax2You
Senior Member
Pax2You's Avatar
554 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by Pax2You.
Jul 10, 2016 20:23 |  #23

Before you give up on that much range in glass, it might behoove you to rent the two lenses in question.


7D, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Sigma APO 2x DG EX TC, Kenko 1.4x MC4 DGX TC, 50mm 1.8, 18-55mm II, 10-18mm IS STM, Tiffen aXent ND 3.0 (ND1000) filter, Olympus OMD E-M5, Oly 14-42mm, Oly 12-50mm, ZEQ25gt Mount, plus a few other lenses, extension tubes, and general mish-mash

LOG IN TO REPLY
FuturamaJSP
Goldmember
FuturamaJSP's Avatar
2,217 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Jul 11, 2016 04:24 as a reply to post 18061168 |  #24

how do you get 600mm f4 with 200mm f2 + 2x tc?
even its mounted on aps-c it's still not the same as a 600 f4


They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
blah blah blah
DAexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Echo63
Goldmember
Echo63's Avatar
2,846 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Perth - Western Australia - Earth
Jul 11, 2016 09:22 |  #25

FuturamaJSP wrote in post #18063698 (external link)
how do you get 600mm f4 with 200mm f2 + 2x tc?
even its mounted on aps-c it's still not the same as a 600 f4

Field of view is similar, but it not the same in any way shape or form.....


My Best Imageswww.echo63.deviantart.​comexternal link
Gear listhttp://photography-on-the.net ...p?p=2463426&postcou​nt=385

LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,247 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Sunny California
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by CheshireCat.
Jul 13, 2016 03:11 |  #26

bildeb0rg wrote in post #18061168 (external link)
tough one. get the 200L and a 2x iii, best of all worlds as you're covered from 200 up to 600 f4 that way. oh, and let us know how you got on...

Ahem... 200*2=400, but I also wish it were 600 :)

Back to the original question: I have the 200/2 and the 1.4x TC makes it 95% as good as the 300/2.8.
Get the 200/2 and never look back. If you'll ever need much more reach, save for a nice 500+ mm lens.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Jul 13, 2016 05:16 |  #27

CheshireCat wrote in post #18065654 (external link)
Ahem... 200*2=400, but I also wish it were 600 :)

Back to the original question: I have the 200/2 and the 1.4x TC makes it 95% as good as the 300/2.8.
Get the 200/2 and never look back. If you'll ever need much more reach, save for a nice 500+ mm lens.

I'm fairly sure I will get the 200.

Just to clarify the 400 or 600 bit. One of the earlier posters was referring to the effective angle of view of the 200+2X on a 7Dii which is approximately equal to 600mm.


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
FuturamaJSP
Goldmember
FuturamaJSP's Avatar
2,217 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Jul 13, 2016 06:26 as a reply to CheshireCat's post |  #28

but the thing is he wants to get rid of all the other lenses that he currently owns to get either the 200L or 300L
Personally i would never do that because I love my wide and standard zooms and 85L too much


They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
blah blah blah
DAexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Jul 13, 2016 09:51 |  #29

FuturamaJSP wrote in post #18065725 (external link)
but the thing is he wants to get rid of all the other lenses that he currently owns to get either the 200L or 300L
Personally i would never do that because I love my wide and standard zooms and 85L too much

I'm with you on the 85L but I can't recall the last time I used a wide angle.
When I use the 24-70L it is mostly at 70 which is as close as makes no difference to 85.

Don't get me wrong, I think all of my lenses are good quality but I just don't like them.


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
bildeb0rg's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
uk
Jul 14, 2016 15:32 |  #30

Just an FYI, Wex are showing a used condition 9- 200L for £3045. Could be a way to save a few bob...




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

5,583 views & 11 likes for this thread
All my lenses for one big one.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00384 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is surf75
853 guests, 332 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016