Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 23 Jun 2016 (Thursday) 13:35
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

ISO 200, f/1.8, 1/2000, portrait.....what's the point of 200 ISO?

 
jra
Cream of the Crop
jra's Avatar
6,499 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Ohio
Jun 28, 2016 17:07 as a reply to post 18052500 |  #16

If you're exposing the photo properly, I don't see how ISO 200 would yield any better shadow detail than ISO 100 (that's assuming that you're adjusting your aperture or shutter speed 1 stop to compensate for the increased ISO). On the other hand, if the higher ISO is being used to ETTR and the shutter speed and aperture are not being used to fully compensate for the higher ISO, then I think there is validity to the idea of maintaining better shadow detail. When in bright sun, it's often possible to ETTR by adjusting either aperture or shutter speed without the need to boost ISO. From my understanding, simply shooting at a higher ISO and compensating with the aperture or shutter speed is not going to yield any better shadow results. Thoughts?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tonylong
...winded
tonylong's Avatar
54,592 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Aug 03, 2016 21:38 |  #17

I'll admit, I tend to be from the "old school" of digital photography, where ISO 100 was the "default" ror good quality photos, but this assumed that you could get a great exposure, but for the shadows as well, including a proper shutter speed and aperture, all so that you could get a good shot!

Since I wanted good shadow details, I have tended to "ETTR" (Expose To The Right) anyway...

So, if I were shooting on a bright, sun-shiny day, I'd set the exposure of the bright blue sky at +1 EV, light, but it was a good setting for a variety of shades.

And then, speaking of variety, you had to work with your other settings, including the ISO speed! If you had action, then ISO 100 wasn't enough!

Here are a couple pics where I was cranked up to ISO 400, and was still lucky:

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2010
Toronto, Canada
Aug 03, 2016 22:53 |  #18

ISO 200, f/1.8, 1/2000, portrait.....what's the point of 200 ISO?

I'd be more concerned about a depth of field insufficient to get the entire head in focus at this f-stop. Unless it's on a crop sensor or not a close up portrait, I need about f/5.6 for a good one.




LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
47,719 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Aug 03, 2016 23:06 |  #19

I was shooting some helicopters today, and wanted to slow things down to get prop blur.
This was on my 7D2.

I dropped the ISO as far as it would go and BAM, 200 was it. I had some custom function enabled that required auto ISO shifting (tone priority maybe) and had no time to dive into menus.

So up went aperture to like f/22.

Anyway, not a portrait setting, but sometimes your sort of stuck with no ISO 100 :)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2010
New Zealand
Aug 04, 2016 17:12 |  #20

ISO 200 on canon could be highlite protection enabled.

That pushes ISO to 200, but effectively exposes as ISO 100, so the highlites are less clipped.


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2010
Toronto, Canada
Aug 04, 2016 17:23 |  #21

RobDickinson wrote in post #18086657 (external link)
ISO 200 on canon could be highlite protection enabled.

That pushes ISO to 200, but effectively exposes as ISO 100, so the highlites are less clipped.

Is that the mythical ISO 2oo?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,582 views & 1 like for this thread
ISO 200, f/1.8, 1/2000, portrait.....what's the point of 200 ISO?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00325 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is arsurendran
767 guests, 319 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016