Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 07 Mar 2016 (Monday) 09:29
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Old L lenses that are still in production

 
dolina
Goldmember
dolina's Avatar
4,795 posts
Joined Mar 2009
34109
Mar 07, 2016 09:29 |  #1

These L lenses were introduced before 2006 and are still in production. They are likely to get a Series II or IS update.

1993 EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
1995 EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
1996 EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
1996 EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM
1996 EF 135mm f/2L USM
1997 EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
1999 EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
2004 EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM


Visit my Flickrexternal link, Facebookexternal link & 500pxexternal link and see my photos. :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
smythie
I wasn't even trying
Joined Jun 2009
Sydney - Australia
Mar 15, 2016 05:25 |  #2

dolina wrote in post #17926614 (external link)
These L lenses were introduced before 2006 and are still in production. They are likely to get a Series II or IS update.

1993 EF 400mm f/5.6L USM - I think an upgrade of this is unlikely: the 100-400mk2 has rendered it largely redundant
1995 EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM - Already superseded twice. I see no reason it would be updated to mk2
1996 EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM - it'd be awesome if this was updated but I think the 70-200/2.8 IS Mk2 makes this redundant other than for colour and size
1996 EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM
1996 EF 135mm f/2L USM
1997 EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
1999 EF 70-200mm f/4L USM - Already superseded by the IS version. I see no reason it would be updated to a mk2
2004 EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM

I'm not sure the 28-300 would even be updated


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
bkdc
Senior Member
bkdc's Avatar
884 posts
Joined Aug 2007
NoVA
Post has been last edited over 1 year ago by bkdc. 5 edits done in total.
Mar 21, 2016 14:27 |  #3

I could see 70-200 f2.8L just getting phased out instead of updated. Cost issues aside everyone will choose the IS version, and the street price is much more reasonable these days. Same for the 70-200 f/4 lens. I don't see much of a market for a non IS version. Among the lenses listed, the one that badly needs an optical improvement is the 200 f/2.8 II prime.


EF 8-15L fisheye | 16-35 f/4L IS | 24-70 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 100-400L II | 35L II | 40 f/2.8 pancake | 50 f/1.8 STM | 100L Macro | 600EX-RT x 3
Tamron 24-70

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,125 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Jul 06, 2016 05:53 |  #4

bkdc wrote in post #17943292 (external link)
I could see 70-200 f2.8L just getting phased out instead of updated. Cost issues aside everyone will choose the IS version, and the street price is much more reasonable these days. Same for the 70-200 f/4 lens. I don't see much of a market for a non IS version. Among the lenses listed, the one that badly needs an optical improvement is the 200 f/2.8 II prime.

The 200 2.8 and 135 are both stellar performers. Updating them would be nice but no reason to complain now. Both perform within 5% of the 70-200 2.8 MK2


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
904canon
Member
106 posts
Joined Dec 2012
NY
Jul 06, 2016 07:18 |  #5

The 1993 EF 400mm f/5.6L USM will probably bite the dust too.




LOG IN TO REPLY
dinanm3atl
Goldmember
dinanm3atl's Avatar
3,120 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Atlanta, GA
Aug 19, 2016 23:16 |  #6

904canon wrote in post #18059272 (external link)
The 1993 EF 400mm f/5.6L USM will probably bite the dust too.

Almost certainly. It's a GREAT lens but the 100-400 Mk2, as said, kind of makes updating pointless.

Although it is a prime and primes are great!


Halston - MotorSports Photographer
1Dx - 1Dx - A7r - 400L f/2.8 - 70-200L f/2.8 - 24-105L f/4 - 17-40L f/4 - 50 f/1.4 - 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye - 1.4x TC - 2x TC
Photography Site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
DionM
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2004
Brisbane, Australia
Aug 21, 2016 08:25 |  #7

dinanm3atl wrote in post #18100492 (external link)
Almost certainly. It's a GREAT lens but the 100-400 Mk2, as said, kind of makes updating pointless.

Although it is a prime and primes are great!

I have both the 100-400 II and the 400/5.6. The 400/5.6 is a lot lighter and a lot easier (thanks to the fact it doesn't have zoom creep) to sling around as a second body+lens combo (I usually have it for BIF). I'd love to see the 400/5.6 gain IS.


Gear List
Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,868 views & 0 likes for this thread
Old L lenses that are still in production
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00142 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is KiwiSean
768 guests, 273 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016