Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 19 Sep 2016 (Monday) 15:24
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sigma optical stabilization on tripod

 
eddieb1
Senior Member
eddieb1's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Oregon
Sep 19, 2016 15:24 |  #1

Does the stabilization in Sigma lenses need to be turned off when on a tripod, specifically when using a gimbal head?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
7,216 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Sep 19, 2016 15:26 |  #2

I used to have a 70-200 OS. For that lens, yes, turn off the OS when on a tripod.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
7,684 posts
Joined May 2003
Southeast Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 2016 08:01 |  #3

For most lenses, this is a good idea. The exceptions are the lenses that have various "modes" on the IS switch. Some modes can handle specific situations. It is also a good idea to look at your situation. As an example, even though I have a relatively high end tripod, in some situations (like gusty winds) I find I can improve my image leaving IS ON. Experiment if need be, digital film is cheap.




LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
eddieb1's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Oregon
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by eddieb1.
Sep 20, 2016 09:26 |  #4

Would treating a gimbal head like a ball head be appropriate? I'm new to gimbal heads and not sure, exactly, how to use one. I plan on working, a lot, with it, but would like some guidance please?




LOG IN TO REPLY
ebiggs
Senior Member
ebiggs's Avatar
Joined Oct 2012
Spring Hill, KS
Sep 20, 2016 20:49 |  #5

eddieb1 wrote in post #18133373 (external link)
Does the stabilization in Sigma lenses need to be turned off when on a tripod, ...

I seem to find it makes little difference. I am sure at times it may hurt but at times it helps. Just like how it is when you hand hold it.


G1x, EOS 1Dx, EOS 1D Mk IV, ef 8-15mm f4L,
ef 16-35mm f2.8L II, ef 24-70mm f2.8L II, ef 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II,
Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
*** PS 6, ACR 9.3, Lightroom 6.5 ***

LOG IN TO REPLY
ebiggs
Senior Member
ebiggs's Avatar
Joined Oct 2012
Spring Hill, KS
Sep 20, 2016 20:50 as a reply to eddieb1's post |  #6

What lens? A gimbal is at its best with bigger teles.


G1x, EOS 1Dx, EOS 1D Mk IV, ef 8-15mm f4L,
ef 16-35mm f2.8L II, ef 24-70mm f2.8L II, ef 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II,
Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
*** PS 6, ACR 9.3, Lightroom 6.5 ***

LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
eddieb1's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Oregon
Sep 20, 2016 23:12 as a reply to ebiggs's post |  #7

Sigma 150-600C




LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
Sep 21, 2016 13:46 |  #8

Well generally when tracking using a gimbal head you will have the system lose, so that you can track, so you will be holding onto the camera/lens combination and imparting some unwanted motion, so yes you will want to most probably be using mode 2 OS. It's what I would do if I were using one for my one.

Personally for airshows, where I need to be able to swing the pan through 180 degrees as the aircraft pass across the front of me I always found using a tripod difficult. With that much rotation I used to find that I needed to walk around the thing. now I'm in a wheelchair there is zero chance to that. Back in the late 70's I discovered a shoulder stock system that I started using with a 400mm lens. This was of course pre image stabilisation, or even AF for that matter, and I found it very useful. Unfortunately I lost the thing over the years in some house move or other. When I got my 150-600 C I got hold of one of those cheap chinese made 15mm rail systems that they build video rigs from and built a shoulder pod out of that. I use it with a remote release taped to the front handle. It makes life really easy when you have a very large change in direction to deal with.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Photo from BigAl007's gallery.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Photo from BigAl007's gallery.

I was getting regular keepers shooting at 600mm and 1/160s plus applying a 50% crop on my 50D using this rig, the FoV is equivalent to using a 900mm lens (1440mm 35mm FoV equivalent).

Alan

My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
ejenner's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
Denver, CO
Sep 22, 2016 20:15 |  #9

If your hand is on the camera while you are taking photos then (maybe because I mostly do landscapes) I personally do not consider that to be 'on a tripod'. If you mean 'hands off' on a tripod, then I would turn off IS.

I used to have this lens and unless I was panning very quickly I left IS on because it helped be keep the AF point on the subject. I did not notice any problems with the IS when moving the lens fairly rapidly - e.g. following BIF.


Edward Jenner
5DIII, 7DII, M6, GX1 II,M11-22, Sig15mm FE,16-35 F4,TS-E 17,Sig 18-250 OS Macro,M18-150,24-105,T45 1.8VC,70-200 f4 IS,70-200 2.8 vII,Sig 85 1.4,100L,135L,400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ebiggs
Senior Member
ebiggs's Avatar
Joined Oct 2012
Spring Hill, KS
Sep 26, 2016 01:08 |  #10

eddieb1 wrote in post #18133373 (external link)
Does the stabilization in Sigma lenses need to be turned off when on a tripod, specifically when using a gimbal head?

Why not just give it a try? I think you will be surprised at whether you can see or tell the difference most of the time.


G1x, EOS 1Dx, EOS 1D Mk IV, ef 8-15mm f4L,
ef 16-35mm f2.8L II, ef 24-70mm f2.8L II, ef 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II,
Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
*** PS 6, ACR 9.3, Lightroom 6.5 ***

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,089 views & 1 like for this thread
Sigma optical stabilization on tripod
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00109 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is gkefalas
797 guests, 306 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017