Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk
Thread started 18 Sep 2016 (Sunday) 17:45
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Which Lenses for Senior Photos?

 
SYS
Cream of the Crop
SYS's Avatar
Joined Jul 2004
Gilligan's Island
Sep 18, 2016 17:45 |  #1

Taking senior photos is not my specialty. I'm more a sports and BIF shooter. However, a couple of people asked me if I'm willing to shoot senior photos of their kids and I thought why not.

Of the lenses that I have in my possession, I'd like your input as to which one you'd recommend that I go with. My lens lineup:

Canon 24-70L
Canon 70-200 f/2.8L
Canon 85
Canon 100

I'm thinking 70-200 but if there's a better lens for senior photos, I'm all ears. Thanks.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear & DIYs

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
texkam's Avatar
1,126 posts
Joined Mar 2012
By The Lake in Big D
Sep 18, 2016 18:20 |  #2

Sort of like asking "I'm going fishing, what gear should I use." It all depends on what you're fishing for and how you want to fish it. Senior portraits can be shot a million creative ways. You choose the best tool to capture what you want to capture. I could see me using all except perhaps the 100mm. I'd be shooting that 70-200 2.8 at 200 for some wonderful portraits. I'd also be doing some creative things at 24mm as well. Look at examples of Senior pics.




LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
scorpio_e's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
Pa
Sep 19, 2016 09:45 |  #3

Canon 24-70L This one and

this one
Canon 70-200 f/2.8L


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
chauncey's Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jun 2007
MI/CO
Sep 20, 2016 08:07 |  #4

!-- q4590 --

NO...anything over 85 mm.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Sep 21, 2016 15:02 |  #5

Generally, you want a moderate amount of distance between the camera and the subject, in order to minimize unflattering perspective distortion. The 70-200 is great for this. If you're indoors in a smaller room, it'll be hard to get a full length shot with this lens. Put your back against the wall and do the best you can with the lens that gives you the correct framing. If you're outdoors, just stand farther away.

It's tempting to use a wider lens so you can stand close for full-length portraits, but beware of perspective distortion while doing this. For example, if you're using a wide angle lens, holding the camera at your normal standing height, shooting a full-length shot of a standing subject who's 6 feet away from you:
You're both 6 feet tall
Subject's face is 6 feet away from the camera
Subject's feet are 8.5 feet away from the camera
Subject's noggin is going to look 40% bigger than it should. Big head, tiny feet, unflattering perspective distortion.

Or, if you kneel down and shoot from waist height, their hips are going to look 20% bigger than they should. No thanks, man.

The farther away you are from the subject, the less significant this perspective distortion.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
K ­ Soze
Goldmember
K Soze's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Sep 21, 2016 15:19 as a reply to scorpio_e's post |  #6

These two will have you coved for almost ANYTHING, but don't tell my wife because I have 8 more lenses and three extenders.


I try to make art by pushing buttons

LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
SYS's Avatar
Joined Jul 2004
Gilligan's Island
Sep 21, 2016 22:14 |  #7

Thanks everyone for your input!



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear & DIYs

LOG IN TO REPLY
Joker-USMC
Member
Joker-USMC's Avatar
32 posts
Joined Mar 2014
Sep 22, 2016 08:34 |  #8

the 70-200 is my go-to lens for seniors. after that, maybe the 85.




LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
SYS's Avatar
Joined Jul 2004
Gilligan's Island
Sep 27, 2016 12:59 |  #9

Thank you all for your comments and inputs. I opted to go with my 70-200 f/2.8 and here are some sample shots from the session:

IMAGE: https://c5.staticflickr.com/6/5740/29917429756_dc4760c41b_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MzGD​yq] (external link)

IMAGE: https://c4.staticflickr.com/9/8482/29325452763_10087c3c83_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LFoB​qx] (external link)

IMAGE: https://c4.staticflickr.com/9/8048/29325449243_fc0e8829d6_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LFoA​nR] (external link)


"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear & DIYs

LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
RDKirk's Avatar
12,553 posts
Joined May 2004
USA
Post has been last edited over 1 year ago by RDKirk. 2 edits done in total.
Sep 27, 2016 15:52 |  #10

I leap between a 17mm-35mm zoom for specific wide-angle effect and the 70-200 zoom.

Both of these were at 24mm:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by Alveric.
Sep 27, 2016 17:10 |  #11

A number of seniors love their cars. Telephotos are basically useless for pictures that include both –unless you want to be giving them instructions over the cell phone.

So... anything under 85mm!


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
genedarrell
Senior Member
genedarrell's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Kansas
Feb 14, 2017 10:52 |  #12

i shoot 90% of mine with a 50 1.2


www.genespics.com (external link)
1DXMII, 5DMIII X2, Canon L F2.8 70-200, L F4 24-105, Canon 17-40 L, Canon 300 2.8 IS,600EX-RT X2 ,Canon 2X extender II

LOG IN TO REPLY
cueball
Senior Member
cueball's Avatar
468 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Oklahoma
Oct 03, 2017 09:16 as a reply to SYS's post |  #13

I think you did a really great job with these!!! I love my 70-200 for portraits ߘ


Canon: 5D Mark IV, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70 f2.8L II, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS II, 100 f2.8L IS Macro, 2X III, 1.4X III, 580EX II, 430EX | mu43: Olympus OMD EM-1, 17 f1.8, 45 f1.8, 75 f1.8, 12-40 f2.8 PRO, 40-150 f2.8 PRO, MC-14
Feedback: http://photography-on-the.net ...=12723614&postcount​=27889, http://photography-on-the.net ...=13303433&postcount​=30051

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6,934 views & 8 likes for this thread
Which Lenses for Senior Photos?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00118 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is radislavi4
990 guests, 498 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017