Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 30 Jul 2014 (Wednesday) 13:39
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos! (2)

 
fordmondeo
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Sep 28, 2016 06:45 |  #6421

That is gobsmackingly good.

How much for a full res copy?


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
toad8787
Member
toad8787's Avatar
77 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Sep 28, 2016 09:19 as a reply to fordmondeo's post |  #6422

Sent you a PM. Thanks!


6D | 35mm f1.4L | 40mm f2.8 STM | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200mm f2.8 IS II | Sy 24mm f1.4 | Sy 14mm f2.8
Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jamganz
Goldmember
Joined Jun 2011
New York
Sep 28, 2016 10:01 |  #6423

kiwichris wrote in post #18142376 (external link)
I have the original ultrasonic 24-105 L IS. Came with the 6D. While I was ok with it it never quite reached my expectations, I was a little disapointed with my first L lens. A few weeks ago I had the local Canon workshop 'match' the lens and camera as well as service the 6D. ( my tech expertise in that area is rated at around -11 :) )While it wasn't cheap the results have been truly astounding. My van pic back a bit was shot at wide open and that is quite a severe crop but the signage on the left is easily read and you can see the weave of the blanket on which I focused. The only problem with it I find is I would like a longer reach. Image quality is truly, very very good, and focus has certainly speeded up. I have seen reports that the usm version is at least equally as good.

I like that bridge pic Eric! :)

Thanks Chris! Glad to hear that you are getting better results since the 'matching' was done. I have to admit after this shot and a couple of others on my initial outing with it, I wasn't overly excited. However, after having getting acquainted with it on the camera for a bit, I am much happier with the results. I have to admit to being very curious to the new version of this lens though. Unfortunately, my daughters college tuition is putting a damper on any purchases for the next 6-8 months when she finishes up:-(




LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
Senior Member
eddieb1's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Oregon
Sep 28, 2016 10:08 |  #6424

sirquack wrote in post #18142229 (external link)
Wow, I guess I never considered the 6D or the 24-105 as not great gear. To each their own I suppose.

I think it's great gear and own and use this combo. I was being facetious. For some on this forum, the only camera even worth considering is the 5DIII. If you look through the forum, you get, lousy auto focus, slow frame rate, etc. On the lens, mediocre sharpness, poor edge performance, etc. I love my 6D and 24-105. But, to each their own I suppose.:mrgreen:




LOG IN TO REPLY
jamganz
Goldmember
Joined Jun 2011
New York
Sep 28, 2016 10:34 |  #6425

eddieb1 wrote in post #18142725 (external link)
I think it's great gear and own and use this combo. I was being facetious. For some on this forum, the only camera even worth considering is the 5DIII. If you look through the forum, you get, lousy auto focus, slow frame rate, etc. On the lens, mediocre sharpness, poor edge performance, etc. I love my 6D and 24-105. But, to each their own I suppose.:mrgreen:

As the response was originally made to my post, that is the way I interpreted it. Agree with your comments...don't know why the 24-105 gets a bad rap by some. If they don't have a body with MFA, it may account for lack of sharpness.




LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
Senior Member
eddieb1's Avatar
707 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Oregon
Sep 28, 2016 10:54 |  #6426

jamganz wrote in post #18142745 (external link)
As the response was originally made to my post, that is the way I interpreted it. Agree with your comments...don't know why the 24-105 gets a bad rap by some. If they don't have a body with MFA, it may account for lack of sharpness.

Or, they never owned the combination but read on the internet, where everybody is an expert.




LOG IN TO REPLY
xpfloyd
Cream of the Crop
xpfloyd's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Glasgow, Scotland
Sep 28, 2016 13:32 |  #6427

AnnieMacD wrote in post #18136903 (external link)
First day of autumn in the northern hemisphere - sunset is due west.
QUOTED IMAGE
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MjjM​ah] (external link)Culduie Sunset 2016.09.21 (external link) by Annie MacDonald (external link), on Flickr

This is amazing Annie


Eddie | flickr (external link)| gear
x100F | α7R II
Voigtlander 15 | Zeiss Loxia 21 | Sony 28 | Sony 24-70 GM | Zeiss Batis 85 | Contax Zeiss 100-300

LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
Goldmember
don1163's Avatar
Joined May 2015
Washford, Somerset/ UK
Sep 28, 2016 13:33 |  #6428

Fantastic shot....


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
AnnieMacD's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
Applecross, Scotland
Sep 28, 2016 13:51 |  #6429

xpfloyd wrote in post #18142874 (external link)
This is amazing Annie

Thanks, Eddie.


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tounis
Member
Joined Jun 2012
Sep 28, 2016 15:04 |  #6430

IMAGE: https://c5.staticflickr.com/9/8661/29697395780_f6ed78bef5_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MffV​8b] (external link)Evening walk (external link) by Pierre (external link), on Flickr

Pierre
My Flickr galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisAttebery
Senior Member
ChrisAttebery's Avatar
Joined Oct 2014
Gilroy, CA
Sep 28, 2016 17:14 |  #6431

I was thinking along the lines of the Sigma ART lenses vs Canon L lenses. The Sigma 35mm and 50mm ART are known for slow and sometimes inaccurate focus. The L series tend to focus quicker and more accurately.

saea501 wrote in post #18141646 (external link)
Yea....the lens does all the tracking. :rolleyes:

not.


Canon EOS 6D | Canon EF 16-35 f/4 L IS USM, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, EF 100mm f/2 USM | Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C |
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Trevor04GT
Senior Member
Trevor04GT's Avatar
Joined Dec 2009
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 28, 2016 17:30 |  #6432

My boy from this past weekend.

IMAGE: https://c6.staticflickr.com/9/8207/29910380901_2704a6a775_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Mz5w​br] (external link)Tyler outside (external link) by Trevor Sprink (external link), on Flickr

Trevor - Canon 6D / Canon 35mm 1.4L / Canon 50mm 1.4 USM / Canon 24-105mm F4L / Canon 135mm F2L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
sirquack's Avatar
Joined Jan 2013
Des Moines, Iowa
Sep 28, 2016 18:40 |  #6433

The 6D/70-200 2.8 combo seems to be a match made in heaven. I can actually see the veins in the wings on the monarch. I really think I am going to like taking photos with this combo.

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/6/5297/29680040570_b0b9fbf021_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MdHY​2q] (external link)Butterflies (external link) by Ron Ellsworth (external link), on Flickr

Name is Ron.
Camera Bodies - T3i/(6D/7D2)-Gripped : Light - Yongnuo 565 EX/Mettle 600 Strobe
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Flickr (external link)
Edit photos as needed

LOG IN TO REPLY
white ­ venom
Goldmember
white venom's Avatar
Joined Jul 2011
Knoxville, Tennessee
Sep 28, 2016 18:48 |  #6434

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5171/29994400385_7150c860c0_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MGv9​fe] (external link)IMG_1721 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

Gear List~Website (external link)~Facebook (external link)~500px (external link)~flickr (external link)~SmugMug (external link)
Feedback-1 2345

LOG IN TO REPLY
greenjeans
Goldmember
greenjeans's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
Greenville, SC
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by greenjeans.
Sep 28, 2016 19:21 |  #6435

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/9/8801/29700846450_07f64ebd27_z.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MfyA​Tu] (external link)IMG_0034 (external link) by Gene Spearman (external link), on Flickr

Gripped 6D, gripped 70D, gripped T3i, 24-105 F4L, 50mm 1.8 STM, 55-250mm, 18-135mm, 60mm EF-S macro, 70-200 F4L IS, 400mm F5.6L, 18-55mm IS STM, Canon 85mm 1.8, Sigma 150-600mm C., Sigma 100-400mm C, Samyang 8mm 3.5 fisheye

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,871,531 views & 15539 likes for this thread
6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos! (2)
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00924 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.1s
Latest registered member is Willow-wisp
996 guests, 527 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017