Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 10 Sep 2015 (Thursday) 07:02
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6D mkii rumor

 
Dlee13
Goldmember
Dlee13's Avatar
Joined Apr 2012
Sydney
Sep 21, 2016 20:46 |  #121

I think it comes down to how long the body had actually been in production. Although that rebel may have been released earlier, they may have been designing the 6D for longer. Even if we only get 19 points in the 6D2, as long as they're all cross type and we have DPAF I'm happy!


Canon 6D Mark II ~ Canon M5 ~ Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 ~ Canon EF 35mm f2 IS ~ Canon EF 17-40mm f4L ~ Canon EF 100mm f2.8L IS USM ~ Sigma 85mm f1.4
Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Sep 21, 2016 21:52 |  #122

Dlee13 wrote in post #18136085 (external link)
I think it comes down to how long the body had actually been in production. Although that rebel may have been released earlier, they may have been designing the 6D for longer. Even if we only get 19 points in the 6D2, as long as they're all cross type and we have DPAF I'm happy!

The number isn't as important to me as the spread. For instance, I would rather have cross 19 points with four covering the rule of thirds than to have 45-62 cross point with no points covering the rule of thirds.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dlee13
Goldmember
Dlee13's Avatar
Joined Apr 2012
Sydney
Sep 21, 2016 23:21 |  #123

FEChariot wrote in post #18136137 (external link)
The number isn't as important to me as the spread. For instance, I would rather have cross 19 points with four covering the rule of thirds than to have 45-62 cross point with no points covering the rule of thirds.

Couldn't agree more. Although if you have DPAF that would really help with framing. I always want to use the far right AF point for full body portraits but can never nail focus with my 6D. The tracking on DPAF would make that super easy.


Canon 6D Mark II ~ Canon M5 ~ Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 ~ Canon EF 35mm f2 IS ~ Canon EF 17-40mm f4L ~ Canon EF 100mm f2.8L IS USM ~ Sigma 85mm f1.4
Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
Mark0159's Avatar
12,719 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Joined Mar 2003
Hamilton, New Zealand
Sep 22, 2016 00:31 |  #124

FEChariot wrote in post #18136137 (external link)
The number isn't as important to me as the spread. For instance, I would rather have cross 19 points with four covering the rule of thirds than to have 45-62 cross point with no points covering the rule of thirds.

hey you never know, you might get lucky with the 6Dmk2


Mark
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/52782633@N04 (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Tamron SP 35mm F1.8 Di VC USD | Canon Speedlite 550EX -|- Film | Canon EOS 3 | Olympus OM2 | Zuiko 35mm f2

LOG IN TO REPLY
LucasCK
Senior Member
348 posts
Joined May 2010
Nov 17, 2016 15:45 |  #125

All I want is improved autofocus. I am finding my current 6d's are really having trouble focusing in difficult situations such as back lighting, and shady areas.


5d4, 2x6d, 5d2, 24-70L II, Sigma 35A 1.4, Canon 70-200 2.8L II, 135 2.0L, 430ex2, 600ex-rt
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com (external link)
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com ...ane-wedding-photographer/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,759 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Nov 17, 2016 15:53 |  #126

LucasCK wrote in post #18187352 (external link)
All I want is improved autofocus. I am finding my current 6d's are really having trouble focusing in difficult situations such as back lighting, and shady areas.

Maybe you push your camera(s) harder than I do. My 6D is the best-focusing body I've ever had. It is dead-on accurate with every lens I own, every time. This may matter: I only use the center point, and generally avoid AI-Servo. I bought a 1DIV for that.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
LucasCK
Senior Member
348 posts
Joined May 2010
Nov 17, 2016 15:57 as a reply to Bassat's post |  #127

That's interesting. I find the 6d rocks for AI-Servo. I find backlighting is where it struggles the most. I am using 6d's for wedding photography however


5d4, 2x6d, 5d2, 24-70L II, Sigma 35A 1.4, Canon 70-200 2.8L II, 135 2.0L, 430ex2, 600ex-rt
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com (external link)
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com ...ane-wedding-photographer/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Nov 17, 2016 16:16 |  #128

Bassat wrote in post #18187362 (external link)
Maybe you push your camera(s) harder than I do. My 6D is the best-focusing body I've ever had. It is dead-on accurate with every lens I own, every time. This may matter: I only use the center point, and generally avoid AI-Servo. I bought a 1DIV for that.

The percentage of time I put my subject at the center focusing point in a picture is essentially zero.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
Joined Jun 2009
Sydney - Australia
Nov 17, 2016 16:29 |  #129

It's something of a luxury that the better bodies with larger numbers of reliable AF points spread out across more of the frame allow us to use. On bodies like the 6D and 5D2 (and even the D610/600 to slightly lesser extent IMO, though there you're talking about the small centre 3 columns) the centre point is almost mandatory - you can work around this by framing a bit more loosely to allow a crop in post for the composition you desire


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
Naturalist's Avatar
Joined May 2007
Tallgrass prairies of northwest Minnesota
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by Naturalist.
Nov 17, 2016 17:48 |  #130

I've been wanting a FF that doesn't cost USD $3,500 or more so if a improved 6D were released I'd be all over that!


Doug
My Gear List
http://www.douglasbrow​nsr.com (external link)
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/128037573@N07/ (external link)
Entered: 2-16-84 Passed: 5-22-84 Raised: 6-19-84

LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
mystik610's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
Houston, TX
Nov 17, 2016 18:09 |  #131

smythie wrote in post #18187392 (external link)
It's something of a luxury that the better bodies with larger numbers of reliable AF points spread out across more of the frame allow us to use. On bodies like the 6D and 5D2 (and even the D610/600 to slightly lesser extent IMO, though there you're talking about the small centre 3 columns) the centre point is almost mandatory - you can work around this by framing a bit more loosely to allow a crop in post for the composition you desire

That might have been a luxury 5 years ago, but a camera that can focus consistently away from the center should be the norm for a camera in 2016. If the 6DII does not have a more robust AF system I'd call it a bust.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀII - RX1ʀII - α7ʀIII
Zeiss Loxia 21 - Canon 24-70 2.8LII - Sony/Zeiss 35 f1.4 ZA - 85GM - Sigma 135 f1.8 ART - Sony 70-200GM

LOG IN TO REPLY
elitejp
Goldmember
Joined Mar 2008
Nov 18, 2016 00:55 |  #132

With the specs of the new 5d4 compared to what sony is offering I don't see anything that a 6d2 will offer that isn't already being offered by a Sony counterpart. However you would need to switch gear which isn't the most cost effective thing to do


6D; canon 85mm 1.8, Tamron 24-70mm VC, Canon 135L Canon 70-200L is ii

LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
scorpio_e's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
Pa
Nov 18, 2016 05:59 |  #133

elitejp wrote in post #18187700 (external link)
With the specs of the new 5d4 compared to what sony is offering I don't see anything that a 6d2 will offer that isn't already being offered by a Sony counterpart. However you would need to switch gear which isn't the most cost effective thing to do

Unfortunately even Canon lenses do not hold value like they did in the past and are not as easy to sell. Switching gear would be costly.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
mystik610's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
Houston, TX
Nov 18, 2016 06:13 |  #134

scorpio_e wrote in post #18187783 (external link)
Unfortunately even Canon lenses do not hold value like they did in the past and are not as easy to sell. Switching gear would be costly.

The good thing about getting a Sony body is that you can adapt your Canon lenses....but most people who get a Sony body with the intention of adapting lenses end up transitioning to Sony lenses for various reasons. (mostly because adapted AF is not the best, and Sony lenses are actually really good).

Sony gear actually holds its value better than Canon does these days, so its moving from Canon to Sony can be painful. I have been transitioning over the past two years or so and I'm happy with the move, but it's been expensive. The ability to adapt lenses does mean you can take your time transitioning, which has been nice.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀII - RX1ʀII - α7ʀIII
Zeiss Loxia 21 - Canon 24-70 2.8LII - Sony/Zeiss 35 f1.4 ZA - 85GM - Sigma 135 f1.8 ART - Sony 70-200GM

LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
Goldmember
digirebelva's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
Appomattox, Virginia
Nov 18, 2016 06:59 |  #135

Bassat wrote in post #18187362 (external link)
This may matter: I only use the center point

But you paid for ALL the points....the rest of the points generally suck, center point is fantastic no doubt...but when center point can't lock on (which does happen when I am doing RE photography), then most of the time, none of the other points can either, even when a point is sitting squarely on a area of high contrast/low contrast. My older 7d doesn't have the same issue.


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

41,955 views & 133 likes for this thread
6D mkii rumor
FORUMS News & Rumors Camera Rumors and Predictions


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0019 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is jksnipersydney
496 guests, 446 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017