Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 01 Feb 2017 (Wednesday) 12:26
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Ultra Wide -

 
vargasjv
Senior Member
vargasjv's Avatar
646 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Feb 01, 2017 12:26 |  #1

Has anyone used both the Canon 11-24 and the Sigma 12-24 Art?

Feedback? Commentss




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
harveyhaddixfan
Member
Joined Nov 2016
Springfield, Ohio
Feb 01, 2017 13:59 |  #2

I was about to ask something like this too. I was looking for an ultra wide (10-12 on the wide end) for a crop sensor. I haven't seen the Canon 11-24 or Sigma 12-24. I've come across a Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24 & a Tokina 11-16. No clue which one is the best buy.




LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
MatthewK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
Maryland
Feb 01, 2017 14:04 as a reply to harveyhaddixfan's post |  #3

The Canon 10-22 will be wider on a crop than the ultra-expensive 11-24. You'd need to use the 11-24 on a FF camera to get the benefit of the ultra-wide 11mm. The 10-22 on an APS-C sensor will be an equivalent to 16-35 FF, which is pretty wide, but nowhere near the 11-24.

I don't have experience with any of those lenses though :)


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,825 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Feb 01, 2017 14:11 |  #4

the 11-24 is good, but super fat and pretty darn heavy. Reviews put the sigma slightly behind, but in the same league. You either use rear gels for ND's or super awkward 150mm filters. 11 is a nice POV if you care about verticals. I shoot 10mm on FF often, can make for some dramatic shots.


Sony A7rii x2 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
jabtas
Goldmember
jabtas's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
Teesside UK
Feb 01, 2017 14:15 |  #5

Not sure what body you using, but if its a crop check out the Canon 10-18mm STM
Stunning lens for the money and punches waaaay above its weight


Tim
Some Canon stuff, some Sigma stuff and yet more Canon stuff
My Gallery - http://www.pbase.com/j​abtasexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TreeburnerCT
Senior Member
TreeburnerCT's Avatar
Joined Dec 2016
Stratford, CT, USA
Feb 01, 2017 17:50 |  #6

I own the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 and have been very satisfied with the results. Considered a manual focus prime since it's for landscapes and astro, but figured the zoom would allow me to reframe without having to foot-zoom and the AF would make it more versatile than a manual focus lens.

-Joe


RapidPhotoCT.com (external link) | RapidPhotoCT Facebook (external link) | RapidPhotoCT Instagram (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Feb 03, 2017 21:28 |  #7

harveyhaddixfan wrote in post #18261749 (external link)
I was about to ask something like this too. I was looking for an ultra wide (10-12 on the wide end) for a crop sensor. I haven't seen the Canon 11-24 or Sigma 12-24. I've come across a Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24 & a Tokina 11-16. No clue which one is the best buy.

For the price of a 11-24 to use on your crop camera, you can buy a new 6d and a 16-35/4 and have money left over and have better images.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2014
Virginia, USA
Feb 06, 2017 11:01 |  #8

harveyhaddixfan wrote in post #18261749 (external link)
I was about to ask something like this too. I was looking for an ultra wide (10-12 on the wide end) for a crop sensor. I haven't seen the Canon 11-24 or Sigma 12-24. I've come across a Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tamron 10-24 & a Tokina 11-16. No clue which one is the best buy.

I fell in love with the 10-22mm when I had it. Sweet lens for the price and there are probably good deals for used lenses. I wouldn't consider either the Canon or Sigma for FF.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Hokie ­ Jim
Member
Joined Jan 2016
Hillsborough, NC
Feb 06, 2017 12:51 |  #9

FEChariot wrote in post #18264149 (external link)
For the price of a 11-24 to use on your crop camera, you can buy a new 6d and a 16-35/4 and have money left over and have better images.

I love my 6D and 16-35 f/4 :)

11-24 is too rich for me...


The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. - Antoine de Saint Exupéry
Canon 6D | 16-35 f/4L IS | Zeiss Milvus 50 f/1.4 | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 580EXII | Gitzo 1410MK2/RRS BH-55

LOG IN TO REPLY
harveyhaddixfan
Member
Joined Nov 2016
Springfield, Ohio
Feb 06, 2017 13:35 |  #10

Nethawked wrote in post #18266079 (external link)
I fell in love with the 10-22mm when I had it. Sweet lens for the price and there are probably good deals for used lenses. I wouldn't consider either the Canon or Sigma for FF.

I found a deal on here for the 10-22mm with a hood for $285 delivered and jumped on it. I can't wait to get outside and use it. This is a comparison of the wide end of my 18-135 and the 10-22.

(Bonus points if you know who any of those guys are other than Mickey Mantle & Nolan Ryan! ;-)a)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
32,398 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Joined May 2002
Northern Indiana
Post has been edited 10 months ago by TeamSpeed.
Feb 13, 2017 08:41 |  #11

The Sigma 12-24 is nice because it works on both the crop and FF bodies. The Tokina 11-16 works on a FF too, but is most trouble-free at 16mm, I treat it as a 16mm f2.8 prime on the 5D.


Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
vargasjv
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
vargasjv's Avatar
646 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Feb 13, 2017 09:00 as a reply to TeamSpeed's post |  #12

i am leaning towards the Sigma --thanks!




LOG IN TO REPLY
aquaforester
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2011
Feb 13, 2017 09:06 as a reply to jabtas's post |  #13

Yep, great lens for the money ad IS.


Flickr (external link)

Current Gear
Canon 60D, 10-18, 24 Pancake, 60 macro, 70-200 F4

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,257 views & 1 like for this thread
Ultra Wide -
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00155 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.09s
Latest registered member is Invisible Man-
951 guests, 468 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017