Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 29 Mar 2016 (Tuesday) 04:21
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-= 80D owners unite! Discuss and post photos

 
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
Joined May 2011
Gainesville, Florida
Feb 19, 2017 17:26 |  #631

MatthewK wrote in post #18278597 (external link)
Very well could be the case. After reading that recent Lens Rentals article on zoom lens variation, you never know.

Truth be told, I wish I would have avoided that article. I love the results from my 100-400ii on my 1D IV. I just got a 70-200 f/2.8 ll and now I'm worried about it. I'm too anal retentive for my own good.

Sometimes, ignorance really is bliss. ;)


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1D IV | 6Dc | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS |100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
MatthewK
Goldmember
MatthewK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
Maryland
Feb 19, 2017 17:28 |  #632

Phoenixkh wrote in post #18278680 (external link)
Truth be told, I wish I would have avoided that article. I love the results from my 100-400ii on my 1D IV. I just got a 70-200 f/2.8 ll and now I'm worried about it. I'm too anal retentive for my own good.

Sometimes, ignorance really is bliss. ;)

Just remember that it's all about the final picture, not sharpness at 200% :-)


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
Joined May 2011
Gainesville, Florida
Feb 19, 2017 17:44 |  #633

MatthewK wrote in post #18278682 (external link)
Just remember that it's all about the final picture, not sharpness at 200% :-)

Yeah. As long as the birds' and people's eyes are in focus, I'll be ok. I'm usually outside along trails... so zooming with my feet could get me eaten by a gator. That and I can't afford the super telephoto lenses at this point. But I'm getting good enough results to give me that warm and fuzzy feeling. Bird photography has revitalized my life. It's such good therapy for me.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1D IV | 6Dc | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS |100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition

LOG IN TO REPLY
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2014
Feb 19, 2017 18:14 |  #634

Phoenixkh wrote in post #18278680 (external link)
Truth be told, I wish I would have avoided that article. I love the results from my 100-400ii on my 1D IV. I just got a 70-200 f/2.8 ll and now I'm worried about it. I'm too anal retentive for my own good.

Sometimes, ignorance really is bliss. ;)

That article, and then some others about lens aberrations, made me afraid to use ANY lens. Then I had a stiff drink and bought some toys and will just go shoot and not worry unless it looks like crap. :)


Vice President of the No-Talent Gear Head club
SL1 | 24 STM | 18-135 IS STM | 55-250 IS STM
5D3 | 35/2 IS | 40 STM | Σ50A | 50 STM | 100L | 24-70L 2.8 II | 24-105L | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 70-300L | 100-400L II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
Joined May 2011
Gainesville, Florida
Feb 19, 2017 18:48 |  #635

LonelyBoy wrote in post #18278729 (external link)
That article, and then some others about lens aberrations, made me afraid to use ANY lens. Then I had a stiff drink and bought some toys and will just go shoot and not worry unless it looks like crap. :)

Yeah... what else can you do? I did the same, but I still am not completely over the article.... but I've reduced its effects by 85% or so... give or take.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1D IV | 6Dc | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS |100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition

LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrycanon
Senior Member
Terrycanon's Avatar
Joined Mar 2016
Lancashire, UK
Feb 20, 2017 04:13 |  #636

Phoenixkh wrote in post #18278680 (external link)
Truth be told, I wish I would have avoided that article. I love the results from my 100-400ii on my 1D IV. I just got a 70-200 f/2.8 ll and now I'm worried about it. I'm too anal retentive for my own good.

Sometimes, ignorance really is bliss. ;)

That's one article I shall NOT be reading! It's the same with reviews of cameras. Someone will always find something they don't like, and it's often something or nothing. I love my 80D, my 100-400L, and my new 1.4X III converter.


See my pictures on Flickr: tezzerh

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Senior Member
Pippan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2015
Darwin, Australia
Feb 20, 2017 04:43 as a reply to Terrycanon's post |  #637

Roger's articles are not about liking or not liking something, they are based on measurement, research and hands-on experience, and are immensely informative. But I wouldn't be concerned with that lens. This is what he wrote about the 100-400L II after pulling it apart and putting it back together again:

"I know I can’t really, without showing you dozens of other lenses, do a good job of impressing you with just how robustly engineered this lens is. I will say that the insides look more like what we’d expect to see in a 500mm f/4 or 600mm f/4 lens, rather than a telezoom. It’s by far the most heavily engineered zoom lens Aaron and I have ever seen; and we’ve seen the insides of dozens of lenses in this range.
Well done, Canon engineers, well done!"

Then, after doing some MTF and variance testing he wrote:

"Both the MTF and Consistency scores are just outstanding. The 100-400 has some of the highest consistency scores of any zoom lens we’ve ever tested. It waxes the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II lens, for example, having far less copy-to-copy variation."

I just wish I could afford one!




LOG IN TO REPLY
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2014
Post has been last edited 10 months ago by LonelyBoy. 2 edits done in total.
Feb 20, 2017 04:51 |  #638

Pippan wrote in post #18279101 (external link)
It waxes the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II lens, for example, having far less copy-to-copy variation.

Well now you're making me nervous about having just bought one of those!  :p


Vice President of the No-Talent Gear Head club
SL1 | 24 STM | 18-135 IS STM | 55-250 IS STM
5D3 | 35/2 IS | 40 STM | Σ50A | 50 STM | 100L | 24-70L 2.8 II | 24-105L | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 70-300L | 100-400L II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
Joined May 2011
Gainesville, Florida
Feb 20, 2017 11:37 |  #639

Terrycanon wrote in post #18279085 (external link)
That's one article I shall NOT be reading! It's the same with reviews of cameras. Someone will always find something they don't like, and it's often something or nothing. I love my 80D, my 100-400L, and my new 1.4X III converter.

My post was a bit tongue in cheek. I value Roger's input. I make it a habit to read his take on anything I buy because Lens Rentals has tons of gear that gets well used quickly. Add to that all the testing they do and it makes sense to read his take on whatever I'm buying.

Btw, he loves the 100-400ii. ;)


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1D IV | 6Dc | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS |100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition

LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
Joined May 2011
Gainesville, Florida
Feb 20, 2017 11:38 |  #640

LonelyBoy wrote in post #18279103 (external link)
Well now you're making me nervous about having just bought one of those!  :p

LOL me too... I know my 100-400ii is spot on at 100mm and 400mm. I have fewer shots in between. But I just got my 70-200 f/2.8 and haven't had the time to put it through its paces yet.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1D IV | 6Dc | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS |100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition

LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrycanon
Senior Member
Terrycanon's Avatar
Joined Mar 2016
Lancashire, UK
Post has been edited 10 months ago by Terrycanon.
Feb 20, 2017 13:34 |  #641

Phoenixkh wrote in post #18279430 (external link)
My post was a bit tongue in cheek. I value Roger's input. I make it a habit to read his take on anything I buy because Lens Rentals has tons of gear that gets well used quickly. Add to that all the testing they do and it makes sense to read his take on whatever I'm buying.

Btw, he loves the 100-400ii. ;)

Yes, I've sussed that out now! And so he should. Ha! Btw, please don't tell me what he thinks of the 1.4X III extender, as I've just bought one:-D


See my pictures on Flickr: tezzerh

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cormac
Senior Member
Cormac's Avatar
Joined Jan 2014
Indiana
Feb 20, 2017 13:42 |  #642

Link to his reviews?


I want to die peacefully, in my sleep, like my grandfather.
Not screaming, terrified, like his passengers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Senior Member
Pippan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2015
Darwin, Australia
Feb 20, 2017 13:46 as a reply to Cormac's post |  #643

Far more than just reviews, but here: https://www.lensrental​s.com/blog/ (external link)




LOG IN TO REPLY
Cormac
Senior Member
Cormac's Avatar
Joined Jan 2014
Indiana
Feb 20, 2017 13:59 |  #644

Thank you


I want to die peacefully, in my sleep, like my grandfather.
Not screaming, terrified, like his passengers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
i-G12
Wat?
i-G12's Avatar
1,371 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Seattle, WA
Feb 20, 2017 14:25 |  #645

Settle down boys!

80D is a very nice camera.

Don't look for trouble!




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

508,029 views & 5162 likes for this thread
-= 80D owners unite! Discuss and post photos
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00342 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is AlexThimisy
905 guests, 478 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017