Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner
Thread started 19 Mar 2017 (Sunday) 11:31
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Is There Something Wrong with my Settings?

 
Bogino
Senior Member
Bogino's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Southern California
Mar 19, 2017 11:31 |  #1

I was maybe 10 to 15 feet away from this lizard sitting on the same ledge it was one. The lizard was stationary and I was in a very comfortable and relaxed position while aiming the camera. Why am I not getting a much more crisp and sharp image? Used my 7D Mark II and my 70-300mm L lens at 1/200; f/5.6 and ISO 100 on a beautiful sunny day. Something is not right.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon 7D Mark II; Canon 70-300mm "L"; Canon 100mm Macro; Tamron 24-70mm; Tokina 11-16mm 2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
john ­ crossley
Goldmember
john crossley's Avatar
2,033 posts
Joined Nov 2009
The Rhubarb Triangle
Mar 19, 2017 12:13 |  #2

Bogino wrote in post #18305067 (external link)
I was maybe 10 to 15 feet away from this lizard sitting on the same ledge it was one. The lizard was stationary and I was in a very comfortable and relaxed position while aiming the camera. Why am I not getting a much more crisp and sharp image? Used my 7D Mark II and my 70-300mm L lens at 1/200; f/5.6 and ISO 100 on a beautiful sunny day. Something is not right.
thumbnailHosted photo: posted by Bogino in
./showthread.php?p=183​05067&i=i139772715
forum: Critique Corner

The shutter speed seems a little bit on the slow side for the focal length that you were using, unless of course you had IS enabled - you didn’t mention that. Also you haven’t stated where you actually focused on the lizard, or indeed whether you were using single point focusing or zone focusing. Something else to consider is what the focus-limiter switch was set to.


Those that can, do. Those that can't whinge.

LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
PhotosGuy's Avatar
74,874 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Joined Feb 2004
Middle of Michigan
Post has been edited 8 months ago by PhotosGuy.
Mar 19, 2017 12:57 |  #3

It looks like the focus is on the shoulder instead of the eyes. And maybe f/8 would have been a better choice which would have helped to include the nose.
I suggest that you put a ruler at the same angle & distance as the lizard & try some different settings so that you have a better idea of what those settings will give you.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1280 pixels on any side.

LOG IN TO REPLY
atsilverstein
Goldmember
atsilverstein's Avatar
Joined Mar 2015
NYC Metro
Mar 19, 2017 13:29 |  #4

Shutter speed is not high enough for a hand held shot at that focal length, unless you have a solid hold. This seems to be because your iso is only at 100. Next time you should get out of iso 100 so you can crank up the shutter speed and aperture in order to get a clean shot. JMO.


It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll. I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul.
- William Ernest Henley

LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Left Handed Brisket's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post has been last edited 8 months ago by Left Handed Brisket. 2 edits done in total.
Mar 19, 2017 13:30 |  #5

http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)

Crop sensor, 277mm, 5.6, 9 feet

Dof = .06 feet

.06 feet = .72 inches

If that seems in the neighborhood of camera-subject distance, everything is just fine with the camera.

Crank up the ISO and stop down.

SS should be fine considering IS.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Formerly he's gone before apostrophe-gate | Not in gear database: Canon 70-210 3.5-4.5, Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 2x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2006
Cordova, TN
Mar 19, 2017 13:50 |  #6

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #18305159 (external link)
http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)

Crop sensor, 5.6, 9 feet

Dof = .06 feet

.06 feet = .72 inches

If that seems in the neighborhood of camera-subject distance, everything is just fine with the camera.

Crank up the ISO and stop down.

SS should be fine considering IS.

This ^

You lens has a 4 stop IS system so unless you had it turned off, shutter speed should not have been an issue (1/200s + 4 stops = 1/3200s). Either minimum focal distance or DOF probably was the issue.


Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

LOG IN TO REPLY
diveguy
Member
Joined Jun 2014
San Francisco, CA
Mar 19, 2017 14:40 |  #7

Is this the original image, or did you crop in to make the lizard bigger? Based on the frame aspect, it looks like it may have been cropped in tighter than it was shot. Can you post the original image you shot?




LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeearly
Member
mikeearly's Avatar
Joined Aug 2007
Chester, VA
Mar 19, 2017 16:08 |  #8

I would agree with those indicating it seems too be a DOF issue especially if you were at the higher end of that 70-300.


Mike Early
http://www.mdephoto.co​mexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
ejenner's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
Denver, CO
Mar 19, 2017 21:04 |  #9

And focused behind the eye a bit.


Edward Jenner
5DIII, 7DII, M6, GX1 II,M11-22, Sig15mm FE,16-35 F4,TS-E 17,Sig 18-250 OS Macro,M18-150,24-105,T45 1.8VC,70-200 f4 IS,70-200 2.8 vII,Sig 85 1.4,100L,135L,400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
AceCo55
Senior Member
AceCo55's Avatar
260 posts
Joined Mar 2014
South Australia
Mar 20, 2017 03:52 |  #10

Agree with everything said so far.
Was it a hot day? You may have some heat haze effect coming off the rocks. Just something else to consider, but shutter speed and DOF are the more likely reasons.


From the "Land Down Under" ... South Australia

LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
Goldmember
DagoImaging's Avatar
Joined Nov 2012
Mar 20, 2017 07:54 |  #11

Even though the IS is good for "4" stops, only rely on 2 and raise your shutter speed.

As others mentions your DOF is so shallow when you're that close...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Sony a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / Sony HVL-60M

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Pagman's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Mar 22, 2017 23:24 |  #12

If you locked focus on the lizards head the re-composed - then I would say your combo is back focusing a bit.


P.


Nikon D7100, Nikkor 300 f4 IF ED :-)

LOG IN TO REPLY
PCousins
Senior Member
PCousins's Avatar
Joined Nov 2014
Weston-Super-Mare (UK)
Mar 23, 2017 02:19 |  #13

Something not right..............Jus​t look at the background noise, there is so much grain that should not be there at ISO 100, it is the sort of noise you would expect to see at ISO 1600/3200. Also appears to be a bad case of camera shake, nothing appears to be in focus.


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2009
Metro Chicago
Mar 23, 2017 09:17 |  #14

PCousins wrote in post #18308472 (external link)
Something not right..............Jus​t look at the background noise, there is so much grain that should not be there at ISO 100, it is the sort of noise you would expect to see at ISO 1600/3200. Also appears to be a bad case of camera shake, nothing appears to be in focus.

It is way over sharpened. Maybe the OP hit the sharpening so hard to try to get it to look sharp.

IS may claim 4 stops but that's with a steady hand. We have no way of knowing who well braced the shooter was when taking this shot. Given the angle of view its may have been somewhat precarious.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
Goldmember
travisvwright's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
NC
Mar 23, 2017 10:06 |  #15

Looking at the pictures you can tell it's not motion blur. It looks like it was shot in small jpg, then cropped, then over sharpened, but not motion blur or even missed focus.

OP post the original image.


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, T3i, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,079 views & 6 likes for this thread
Is There Something Wrong with my Settings?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00115 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is returntovendor
795 guests, 340 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017