Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 19 Mar 2017 (Sunday) 18:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Camera or lens issue?

 
golfecho
(I will regret that)
Avatar
1,671 posts
Likes: 167
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
     
Mar 19, 2017 18:54 |  #1

OK folks, here's my problem. I just purchased a Sigma 85mm 1.4 ART lens for use on my 5DMk2. I have only used it a few times, but today I gave it a workout in both an outdoor setting and indoor portrait setting.

In both circumstances I was NOT shooting wide open. The outdoor shots included a Rovelight 600B fill, and I needed about F-3.2 and 1/200 seconds (settings driven by ambient light - no ND and didn't want to mess with HSS). All these shots seemed pretty good.

Next, we went inside where I again used the Rovelight on one side, and a Godox 860 on the other. Again, I did NOT shoot wide open. I shot 1/200 seconds, and F-2.8. (I didn't want too narrow a DoF since these were head shots for a career posting).

When I uploaded the shots, nearly every single head shot was OOF almost to the point of not being usable. One or two shots, perhaps, but 20 shots mostly OOF? I was hand holding, but at 1/200 and using a flash, there is no way I should be getting anywhere near the blur I got.

So I set up a test at home. I hung a towel on the wall, set up two flashes, set the F-stop to 1.4, 1/200, on a rock solid tripod, and a 2 second shutter delay. All this should take out all reasonable variables. On my first shot the towel was WAY OOF. Then I locked the mirror up to do a manual focus. I noticed there was very little light to manually focus, so I used a super bright LED flashlight to do the manual focus. The result was razor sharp image. So I am thinking the lens autofocus (or camera's) is screwed up. So for grins, I did another autofocus shot, but this time I used the same LED flashlight when using the autofocus. Result? Razor sharp image.

So, the lens is not focusing well in lower light, but when I depress the shutter halfway, I get the red square and the "beep" indicating an in-focus condition.

So I guess I'm looking for some thoughts on where to go, what to do. The lens is obviously working well in well lit conditions, but why is it missing in lower light but the camera sending the in-focus "beep"

Sorry for the long post. These two posts are Manual focus first, autofocus with LED light second. Both show overall image on the left and a 100% crop on the right.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Facebook (external link) or Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
8,139 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 1549
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 1 year ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Mar 19, 2017 19:02 |  #2

We need to know what the ambient light levels were.

5D mkII is not going to focus in near darkness like some more recent cameras. Especially on a featureless towel, unless it Happened to have an active focus point over the line between towel and wall.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
golfecho
THREAD ­ STARTER
(I will regret that)
Avatar
1,671 posts
Likes: 167
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
     
Mar 19, 2017 19:18 |  #3

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #18305459 (external link)
We need to know what the ambient light levels were.

5D mkII is not going to focus in near darkness like some more recent cameras. Especially on a featureless towel, unless it Happened to have an active focus point over the line between towel and wall.

Ambient light in the towel test was low to medium room light. Not dark by any stretch, but not bright either. I would say is was about what a typical lowish level studio would be.

The portrait session was subdued, but again by no means dark. Also, I was hand holding the portrait shots at F-2.8 and would focus on a facial feature or clothing edge. It missed most every shot.


Facebook (external link) or Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
8,139 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 1549
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Mar 19, 2017 19:33 |  #4

I would first set up the test under the same conditions as the towel, but with a high contrast target. If it can't hit then, I would look into the Sigma Dock to recalibrate the lens.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
golfecho
THREAD ­ STARTER
(I will regret that)
Avatar
1,671 posts
Likes: 167
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
     
Mar 19, 2017 19:39 |  #5

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #18305483 (external link)
I would first set up the test under the same conditions as the towel, but with a high contrast target. If it can't hit then, I would look into the Sigma Dock to recalibrate the lens.

OK. I used the towel because of its texture. I have a sigma dock but haven't used it yet.

I will look into that option . . .


Facebook (external link) or Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,422 views & 0 likes for this thread
Camera or lens issue?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is CanucksFan
593 guests, 349 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.