Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras
Thread started 27 May 2015 (Wednesday) 18:49
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sony A7x lounge

 
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
navydoc's Avatar
10,967 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Inland Empire, So. Cal
Mar 22, 2017 10:51 |  #31396

Chris Niccolls, from "The Camera Store" compares the Sony FE 85 f1.8 and the Zeiss Batis 85 f1.8 lenses.


Gene - My Photo Gallery ||external link My USS Oriskany websiteexternal link || My Flickrexternal link
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,828 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Mar 22, 2017 11:03 |  #31397

navydoc wrote in post #18307937 (external link)
Chris Niccolls, from "The Camera Store" compares the Sony FE 85 f1.8 and the Zeiss Batis 85 f1.8 lenses.

makes me want to preorder...... I already have the funds in my PP account sitting, getting hard to resist..... shooting with the rok 85 usually calms me down a bit, really amazing bokeh and optics plenty fine, will be sad to see it go.... or maybe it will stay....... first world problems.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
10,139 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Aug 2010
West Point, Georgia
Mar 22, 2017 11:13 |  #31398

Get the new Rok 85mm 1.2...looks pretty amazing. :p

Seriously though, the new FE 85mm 1.8 is a Batis killer - I can't imagine Zeiss will be doing a lot of sales for their 85mm going forward. That said, as a Batis owner, I wouldn't sell mine just to get another lens just like it. Wouldn't be a particularly cost-effective move.


David | Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,828 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Mar 22, 2017 11:27 |  #31399

David Arbogast wrote in post #18307948 (external link)
Get the new Rok 85mm 1.2...looks pretty amazing. :p

Seriously though, the new FE 85mm 1.8 is a Batis killer - I can't imagine Zeiss will be doing a lot of sales for their 85mm going forward. That said, as a Batis owner, I wouldn't sell mine just to get another lens just like it. Wouldn't be a particularly cost-effective move.

doesnt that thing weigh like 1kg? I'm being a little fussy with the weight of the rok 85 f1.4, and it's only 550-600g with adapter :-P

For my day to day family shooting, I often leave the rok 85 at home because it's too heavy!


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Mar 22, 2017 13:09 |  #31400

vmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmad

I finally decide to pull the trigger on the LEE CPL...I had some B&H rebates to use...the morons shipped it in a flimsy padded UPS envelope...you guessed it...shattered...

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,828 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Mar 22, 2017 13:15 |  #31401

TRhoads wrote in post #18308042 (external link)
vmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmad

I finally decide to pull the trigger on the LEE CPL...I had some B&H rebates to use...the morons shipped it in a flimsy padded UPS envelope...you guessed it...shattered...

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by TRhoads in
./showthread.php?p=183​08042&i=i187527667
forum: Sony Cameras

I got a voigtlander 10 from ad0rama, and the box had padding all on one side..... luckily it was ok.

on the flip side, I'm going to try some cheaper CPL's on amazon, I recall the LEE CPL being really thick and probably would have trouble on any other holder than the LEE one. I'll let you know how it works out, I was in the market for an ND 1.8 and CPL square, and found some cheapies on amazon, should arrive today for testing.

I'm not paying the LEE premium anymore, too many alternatives available!


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Mar 22, 2017 13:18 |  #31402

Charlie wrote in post #18308047 (external link)
I got a voigtlander 10 from ad0rama, and the box had padding all on one side..... luckily it was ok.

on the flip side, I'm going to try some cheaper CPL's on amazon, I recall the LEE CPL being really thick and probably would have trouble on any other holder than the LEE one. I'll let you know how it works out, I was in the market for an ND 1.8 and CPL square, and found some cheapies on amazon, should arrive today for testing.

I'm not paying the LEE premium anymore, too many alternatives available!

I have had bad experiences with cheap filters...so...I just bite the bullet and invest in them to put in front of my expensive lenses, attached to my 42mp pricey camera...why go to the trouble of buying all of that expensive stuff to throw a cheap potentially crap filter on...

this LEE CPL isn't any thicker than any of the ND filters I use, in fact, my FH Firecrest 16 is the thickest one that doesn't fit very good in the foundation kit.


Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
digital_AM's Avatar
5,675 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Dec 2010
Texas
Mar 22, 2017 13:25 |  #31403

rcarlton wrote in post #18307825 (external link)
Simple fix for her eye: swap one eye for the other.
1. Eliptical marquee tool to select good eye.
2. Ctrl-J for a new layer with selection on it.
3. V to move copied eye over the bad eye.
4. Ctrl-T to bring up free transform. Flip horizontal.
5. Lower opacity and move the eye around until it fits, arrow keys for fine tuning. Once lined up turn opacity to 100%. Keep free transform open as you do this to make eye smaller or larger.
6. Add layer mask. Select B for brush tool. Paint over excess area around eye.
7. Next you need to move the catch light around so it doesn't look weird.
8. Ctrl-alt-shift-E to create a new merged layer. Eliptical marquee tool and select catch light. V to move it to the opposite of the eye. Flip horizontal. Hit enter.
9. Remove the catch light which is in the wrong area with the clone stamp tool.

Awesome. Thank you for providing this.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2, α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8, Loxia 85mm F2.4, Batis 18mm F2.8 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro |

LOG IN TO REPLY
mickeyb105
Goldmember
mickeyb105's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Vero Beach, FL
Mar 22, 2017 13:26 as a reply to David Arbogast's post |  #31404

I may just have to pick up one of the new FE 85 lenses on heels of seeing the strong predictions that the new Zeiss lens will be a 135 f2.8.

After hearing about the 135, I took my Minolta 200 HS APO out for a spin to see if I could continue living with the inconvenience of both MF with the LA-EA4 and the distance I need to shoot with it as a portrait lens.

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2909/32774409643_04fcabb42f_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://www.flickr.com ...774409643/in/photos​tream/] (external link)
park1017 (external link) by Michael Bielecki (external link) on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3844/32774413673_2cbcf21e50_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://www.flickr.com ...774413673/in/photos​tream/] (external link)
park13 (external link) by Michael Bielecki (external link) on Flickr

I can't quite talk myself into an 85 right now, already being happy with the FE55, but maybe the 135 1.8. Still undecided, but I do know that I'm terrible at MF.

And that my sensor needs to be cleaned.

Sony A99ii, RX-100ii, Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 ZA, Minolta HS 200 2.8 APO, Zeiss 24/2 ZA, Minolta 2xTC APO, HVL-F43M
Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
digital_AM's Avatar
5,675 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Dec 2010
Texas
Mar 22, 2017 13:40 |  #31405

TRhoads wrote in post #18308042 (external link)
vmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmad

I finally decide to pull the trigger on the LEE CPL...I had some B&H rebates to use...the morons shipped it in a flimsy padded UPS envelope...you guessed it...shattered...

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by TRhoads in
./showthread.php?p=183​08042&i=i187527667
forum: Sony Cameras

That sucks Travis.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2, α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8, Loxia 85mm F2.4, Batis 18mm F2.8 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro |

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,828 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Mar 22, 2017 13:43 |  #31406

TRhoads wrote in post #18308051 (external link)
I have had bad experiences with cheap filters...so...I just bite the bullet and invest in them to put in front of my expensive lenses, attached to my 42mp pricey camera...why go to the trouble of buying all of that expensive stuff to throw a cheap potentially crap filter on...

this LEE CPL isn't any thicker than any of the ND filters I use, in fact, my FH Firecrest 16 is the thickest one that doesn't fit very good in the foundation kit.

I still have some LEE's, but dont use it. Not the best filters IMO, and priced high.

the haida stuff I've been using has been better than LEE (10 stops). The LEE 10 stopper of my brother's eventually broke and wont be replaced with another LEE.

I had the very old LEE 4x4 CPL, it was super thick, such a pain mounting it everytime, so I sold it off. I'll compare el cheapo CPL with a real zeiss CPL. If they dont live up to their claims, then I'll return it, especially the "Neutral" density, not interested in a blue filter :-P


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
davidfarina's Avatar
Joined May 2013
Mar 22, 2017 13:45 |  #31407

TRhoads wrote in post #18308042 (external link)
vmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmadvmad

I finally decide to pull the trigger on the LEE CPL...I had some B&H rebates to use...the morons shipped it in a flimsy padded UPS envelope...you guessed it...shattered...

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by TRhoads in
./showthread.php?p=183​08042&i=i187527667
forum: Sony Cameras

Idiots :rolleyes:


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Mar 22, 2017 14:07 |  #31408

digital_AM wrote in post #18308065 (external link)
That sucks Travis.

yes it does...I fly out to Houston tomorrow...really wanted to have this filter...

Charlie wrote in post #18308067 (external link)
I still have some LEE's, but dont use it. Not the best filters IMO, and priced high.

the haida stuff I've been using has been better than LEE (10 stops). The LEE 10 stopper of my brother's eventually broke and wont be replaced with another LEE.

I had the very old LEE 4x4 CPL, it was super thick, such a pain mounting it everytime, so I sold it off. I'll compare el cheapo CPL with a real zeiss CPL. If they dont live up to their claims, then I'll return it, especially the "Neutral" density, not interested in a blue filter :-P

If I had it to do all over again, I would go the Firecrest line...they are more neutral...but they were not even around when I started buying ND filters etc...

davidfarina wrote in post #18308072 (external link)
Idiots :rolleyes:

that is putting it very nicely...

B&H is going to replace it...just not in time for this trip.


Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,828 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Mar 22, 2017 14:18 |  #31409

TRhoads wrote in post #18308094 (external link)
yes it does...I fly out to Houston tomorrow...really wanted to have this filter...

If I had it to do all over again, I would go the Firecrest line...they are more neutral...but they were not even around when I started buying ND filters etc...

that is putting it very nicely...

B&H is going to replace it...just not in time for this trip.

you can get the Haida CPL with same day shipping on amazon. Not sure if they offer in your area, but same day shipping is pretty sweet, and may make it for your trip!

I've got way too many filters, and I'll say that haida is slightly better than firecrest, but like you, I got the firecrest 16 when noone else was making them. I've been too lazy to sell my filters, but if my latest purchase works out, I'll be looking to sell a lot of filters, I gotta clear them out! 3, 6, 10, CPL, all I need, gotta get rid of all the grads, just not using them.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
paintballkidz
Senior Member
752 posts
Joined Jan 2010
VANCOUVRE BC
Mar 22, 2017 14:39 |  #31410

Are we expecting a A7riii soon?


6D
24L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,958,337 views & 33330 likes for this thread
Sony A7x lounge
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.03348 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.1s
Latest registered member is EllaDawn
800 guests, 343 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017