Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk
Thread started 03 Apr 2017 (Monday) 17:43
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Flickr and pervs...

 
Kliphe
Senior Member
Kliphe's Avatar
Joined Jun 2010
Canyon, Tx
Apr 03, 2017 17:43 |  #1

Recently I have decided to start posting more photos on this site (starting to lose my fear of comments!) I use flickr to host my images that I want to post here (mainly because I understand/know how to post from flickr) I am a family/senior photographer, pretty darn conservative in my posing and such. I just looked at my activity on Flickr and started looking at who was following me and faving my photos and I am just amazed at the pornography that I have found. Why are these people faving my photos? Is this common for the rest of you that use flickr? I am not a prude, to each his own, but why are there so many people faving my photos and can I stop them?


Always be ready to give reason for your hope

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Larry Johnson's Avatar
1,172 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Sep 2011
Virginia
Apr 03, 2017 18:20 |  #2

There are privacy settings that you can change for your page and for each photo.
I don't get the pervs faving my wildlife photos.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2010
Apr 03, 2017 18:29 |  #3

Kliphe wrote in post #18318657 (external link)
Why are these people faving my photos?

I guess pervs appreciate good photos, too.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
AD ­ Campbell
Senior Member
AD Campbell's Avatar
492 posts
Joined Sep 2013
Apr 03, 2017 19:05 |  #4

I used to get freaked out about it, but now I just don't care.

Not that anyone see's my photos on Flickr anymore. My account got switched to 'moderate' and I can no longer post to groups. :/


I own gear to take photos with...
Adam Campbell - Portrait photographer
www.acampbellphoto.netexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Apr 03, 2017 19:15 |  #5

One thing is to try not to lump someone into a category of perversion on a photography social network.

Regardless of what kind of photography they're sharing, doing, or whatever, they can browse around and favorite good photos.

There's also a difference between pornography and tasteful nudes. But, that's another can of worms that I'll leave alone.

Bottom line is this: when you submit something to social media, it's not in your hands, and you have no control. Don't expect anything. If it's a potential problem, simply don't post it.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kliphe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Kliphe's Avatar
Joined Jun 2010
Canyon, Tx
Apr 03, 2017 20:04 as a reply to MalVeauX's post |  #6

Understand (trust me, I know porn when I see it!) I just can't figure out why they would fav a picture that is not suggestive in the least.


Always be ready to give reason for your hope

LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Colorblinded's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
Apr 03, 2017 20:16 |  #7

Kliphe wrote in post #18318768 (external link)
Understand (trust me, I know porn when I see it!) I just can't figure out why they would fav a picture that is not suggestive in the least.

Maybe it's just a nice photo?

Granted maybe some people like photos because they like the subject matter, regardless of the quality of the photo.

Who knows? I don't worry much about it.


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.comexternal link
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Apr 03, 2017 20:24 |  #8

Kliphe wrote in post #18318768 (external link)
Understand (trust me, I know porn when I see it!) I just can't figure out why they would fav a picture that is not suggestive in the least.

You're inferring they fav'd your photograph with the perspective of sexuality. This is your issue.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
atsilverstein
Goldmember
atsilverstein's Avatar
Joined Mar 2015
NYC Metro
Apr 03, 2017 20:29 |  #9

Just because people are into pornography doesn't mean they have no ability to appreciate anything tasteful..

Humans have varying levels of sexual drive, some low, some high, it doesn't make anyone neither innately evil nor good.


It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll. I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul.
- William Ernest Henley

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kliphe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Kliphe's Avatar
Joined Jun 2010
Canyon, Tx
Apr 03, 2017 20:42 as a reply to atsilverstein's post |  #10

Obviously we will disagree on this (there is objective truth) I am just more into the thought of someone going thru all of the new post on flickr (I don't tag the photos)


Always be ready to give reason for your hope

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Apr 03, 2017 20:55 |  #11

I've had pervs faving my photos or even following my photostream. As was stated above, their clicking is out of our hands; our clicking, OTOH is fully in ours: I don't follow them back nor fav any of their content –even the non-sexual one—point in fact, upon happening on a pornographic photo of theirs I back out of their stream.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Cream of the Crop
kf095's Avatar
Joined Dec 2009
Canada, Ontario, Milton
Apr 03, 2017 21:44 |  #12

it means only one thing here is something in pictures attracting them. And it is not good to have pictures like this favored by strange people.
Upload with "visible only to me" visibility settings. It will be not visible on Flickr, but if you post it here it is going to be visible only here.


Old Site (external link). M-E and ME blog (external link). Film Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Colorblinded's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
Apr 04, 2017 11:47 |  #13

Kliphe wrote in post #18318793 (external link)
Obviously we will disagree on this (there is objective truth) I am just more into the thought of someone going thru all of the new post on flickr (I don't tag the photos)

At this point I'm just not sure what you're still on about (or disagreeing with or saying there is objective truth about).

Flickr has a like button. If someone sees something and likes it for any reason, they might click like. You could look at the kind of work they post and usually like to try to infer why, but it's just a guess and honestly a waste of time.


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.comexternal link
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Apr 04, 2017 12:11 |  #14

The OP's concern might be much like my own: some people tend to judge you by the company you keep: in this case such 'company' are your followers or contacts. Some of us don't want to be associated with people who shoot certain subject matter: it might lead some to believe that we condone it or openly support it.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
drmaxx
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
Apr 04, 2017 13:40 |  #15

You asked for a knife and now you are wondering why it has a sharp edge. Publishing your picture openly comes with the good, bad and ugly. It has the effect that people look at them and you have no control over their personality, race, sexuality, .... If this is bugging you then choose an other outlet or don't publish your pictures.


Donate if you love POTN

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

8,077 views & 50 likes for this thread
Flickr and pervs...
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre People Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00158 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.07s
Latest registered member is RoMEo1
976 guests, 479 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016