Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 07 Sep 2016 (Wednesday) 13:53
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

-= 5D Mark IV owners unite! Post photos and discuss.

 
Tillariina
Mostly Lurking
Tillariina's Avatar
Joined Oct 2014
Finland
Apr 16, 2017 15:04 |  #2581

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon EOS 6D, EOS 5D Mark IV | Olympus E-M5 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM, EF 16-35 f/4 L IS USM, EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD, SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 12-40mm f/2.8, M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II |

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ACESFULL82
Senior Member
ACESFULL82's Avatar
Joined Aug 2013
texas
Apr 16, 2017 17:16 as a reply to Tillariina's post |  #2582

Nice shot! Did it swallow a tennis ball? Lol


Canon crap and Canon lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2005
London, centre of the universe
Apr 16, 2017 18:55 |  #2583

First couple of shots with my new 24-70 f/4 IS. This is going to replace my 24-70 f/2.8 MKII, as its smaller and lighter, and i feel IS and macro are more useful to me at the moment.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon 80D | Canon 650D | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
Joined Oct 2010
Apr 16, 2017 19:57 |  #2584

dave_bass5 wrote in post #18329742 (external link)
First couple of shots with my new 24-70 f/4 IS. This is going to replace my 24-70 f/2.8 MKII, as its smaller and lighter, and i feel IS and macro are more useful to me at the moment.

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by dave_bass5 in
./showthread.php?p=183​29742&i=i86816335
forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras
thumbnailHosted photo: posted by dave_bass5 in
./showthread.php?p=183​29742&i=i218926060
forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras

Beautiful photos!
I never considered the f/4. I'll have to give it some thought.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
white ­ venom
Goldmember
white venom's Avatar
Joined Jul 2011
Knoxville, Tennessee
Apr 16, 2017 20:29 |  #2585

I finally had some time to shoot baseball with the 5D4

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2805/34083816695_4d23865f1d_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TVSt​eZ] (external link)5D4_8310 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2835/33699530910_f087d25155_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TkUU​t1] (external link)5D4_8198 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2888/33953771981_a0157b69b5_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TJnX​tK] (external link)5D4_8356 (external link) by RJ Prusik (external link), on Flickr

Now I have the itch for a 300 2.8...

Gear List~Website (external link)~Facebook (external link)~500px (external link)~flickr (external link)~SmugMug (external link)
Feedback-1 2345

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,147 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Apr 16, 2017 20:41 |  #2586

white venom wrote in post #18329792 (external link)
Now I have the itch for a 300 2.8...

Nice shots... don't go 300 go 400 2.8 trust me.


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
white ­ venom
Goldmember
white venom's Avatar
Joined Jul 2011
Knoxville, Tennessee
Apr 16, 2017 21:01 as a reply to Talley's post |  #2587

I was going to go 300 and a 1.4 teleconverter when needed


Gear List~Website (external link)~Facebook (external link)~500px (external link)~flickr (external link)~SmugMug (external link)
Feedback-1 2345

LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
Senior Member
graham121's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Pakenham, VIC, Aus
Apr 16, 2017 21:17 |  #2588

white venom wrote in post #18329811 (external link)
I was going to go 300 and a 1.4 teleconverter when needed

Great combo and eminently more hand holdable vs the 400 2.8.


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2005
London, centre of the universe
Apr 17, 2017 05:52 |  #2589

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #18329769 (external link)
Beautiful photos!
I never considered the f/4. I'll have to give it some thought.

Thanks. I never thought i would replace the f/2.8 but ive wanted a macro lens for a while, and I'm really too lazy to take one out along with my normal lenses, so this seemed ideal. I must admit ive been blown away with the IQ so far. Close enough to the f/2.8 that i wont notice any real drop in IQ, although of course ill loose a stop of light. IS will make up for that in most cases though (for me anyway).


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon 5DMKIV | Canon 80D | Canon 650D | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

LOG IN TO REPLY
edmidlifecrisis
Goldmember
edmidlifecrisis's Avatar
Joined Jun 2014
Palm Beach County, FL
Apr 17, 2017 06:43 |  #2590

dave_bass5 wrote in post #18330032 (external link)
Thanks. I never thought i would replace the f/2.8 but ive wanted a macro lens for a while, and I'm really too lazy to take one out along with my normal lenses, so this seemed ideal. I must admit ive been blown away with the IQ so far. Close enough to the f/2.8 that i wont notice any real drop in IQ, although of course ill loose a stop of light. IS will make up for that in most cases though (for me anyway).

I have one I have been using with my 6D for a while (a fine combination) and it seems to work well on the 5 also, no reason it shouldn't! I like this lens a lot. The IS and the higher ISO capabilities of the FF don't seem to penalize the lack of an f2.8. Great lens and not too bulky or heavy and the additional near focus ability is a plus. Also I like black "L" lenses way better then the "whites"....:)


Ed
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127634200@N05/ (external link)
https://500px.com/edtl (external link)
Instagram @elsdvm90

LOG IN TO REPLY
rwmson
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2009
Cherry Hill, NJ USA
Apr 17, 2017 06:54 |  #2591

South Jersey marshlands, Saturday morning.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

a gobba gobba glass

LOG IN TO REPLY
ACESFULL82
Senior Member
ACESFULL82's Avatar
Joined Aug 2013
texas
Apr 17, 2017 07:00 |  #2592

white venom wrote in post #18329811 (external link)
I was going to go 300 and a 1.4 teleconverter when needed

Thats what i shoot with, the 300 F2.8 IS II, add on a 1.4 or 2x teleconverter and theres really no loss in IQ. I shoot baseball and football when i need the 2.8 then add on the 2X tele and cover airshows. THe 400 would be nice but i couldnt justify the extra $, and for what i paid for this, its quiet a bit. Lol


Canon crap and Canon lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
AnnieMacD's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
Applecross, Scotland
Apr 17, 2017 07:42 |  #2593

Some shinty from the weekend.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2886/33675176690_260f655cfe_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TiL5​NE] (external link)Kinlochshiel v Beauly (external link) by Annie MacDonald (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2889/34019272046_bd8625b04e_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/TQaE​nd] (external link)Kinlochshiel v Beauly (external link) by Annie MacDonald (external link), on Flickr

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bwhip
Senior Member
bwhip's Avatar
595 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Idaho, USA
Apr 17, 2017 08:21 |  #2594

Took a little ride yesterday...

IMAGE: http://bwhip.com/galleries/BlogPhotos/oregonride_041617/6U4A7655-Edit.jpg

IMAGE: http://bwhip.com/galleries/BlogPhotos/oregonride_041617/6U4A7669.jpg

IMAGE: http://bwhip.com/galleries/BlogPhotos/oregonride_041617/6U4A7702-Edit.jpg

bwhip's blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
Apr 17, 2017 09:41 |  #2595

I know there has been a lot of talk regarding the high ISO ability of the 5DIV. Unless I'm shooting during twilight I almost never see anything above 200 anyway, so historically that hasn't mattered to me a lot. On the few occasions I've used higher ISO's previously I have never been too happy with the results. I got out over the weekend and tried something (needed to basically due to high water flow) and shot this image at ISO 800.

Now, I'll have to say that when processing the image it took quite a bit more work than I typically have to do. I noticed a loss of detail in some of the elements that are further away, and of course there was more noise to deal with, particularly in the darker shadow areas. With shots like this, I typically have to pull up the exposure overall a decent amount, and the shadows even more to keep from clipping portions of the water.

Overall I'm pretty impressed. While I had much rather have this image at ISO 50-200, it ended up being very usable. I certainly wouldn't want to go that high unless I needed to, but it has the ability.

I realize this doesn't apply for people shooting subjects that typically need the quicker shutter speeds, but for a landscape image I find this pretty impressive from an image quality standpoint.

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Waterfalls/i-bxPQKCf/0/X2/IMG_17102-170415-X2.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com ...02-170415-X2.jpg&lb=1&s=A] (external link) on Smugmug

John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

869,035 views & 13681 likes for this thread
-= 5D Mark IV owners unite! Post photos and discuss.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00552 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.11s
Latest registered member is radislavi4
943 guests, 501 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017