Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 17 Dec 2014 (Wednesday) 10:12
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!

 
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2014
Apr 21, 2017 05:27 |  #5836

I love this lens... but I feel like I need one that's even longer.

Yes I know that's not surprising to the rest of you. :p

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Vice President of the No-Talent Gear Head club
SL1 | 24 STM | 18-135 IS STM | 55-250 IS STM
5D3 | 35/2 IS | 40 STM | Σ50A | 50 STM | 100L | 24-70L 2.8 II | 24-105L | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 70-300L | 100-400L II

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
digital ­ paradise
Cream of the Crop
digital paradise's Avatar
11,473 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Apr 21, 2017 06:55 |  #5837

Archibald wrote in post #18333449 (external link)
Have you consulted ebird?

Yes.


Image Editing OK

Websiteexternal link ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Cream of the Crop
digital paradise's Avatar
11,473 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Apr 21, 2017 06:58 |  #5838

IanD wrote in post #18333446 (external link)
Drive a little further east late next fall and I'll get you on Snowies and Great Greys.

OK. I'll keep that in mind. I found one great grey from ebird. There were reports of snowies not far from where I live but the several times I went they weren't there. The images I have seen they mostly hang around on top of the highway lamp posts.


Image Editing OK

Websiteexternal link ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
THREAD ­ STARTER
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
46,965 posts
Gallery: 69 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Apr 21, 2017 13:28 |  #5839

IanD wrote in post #18333670 (external link)
Sort of like our Guard Beavers. :)


Beware of Honey Badgers!!!


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
oximuis
Senior Member
oximuis's Avatar
Joined Sep 2014
Beaufort SC
Apr 21, 2017 22:33 |  #5840

Takeoff !

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon 5D Mark IV,Canon 7D Mark II, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 100-400 Mark II L, Canon 24-70 Mark II, Tokina16-28, Tamron70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC, Samyang 14mm 2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Cream of the Crop
digital paradise's Avatar
11,473 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Apr 22, 2017 10:32 |  #5841

IMAGE: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d74/Zenon1/7D2/_80A4995_zpsbjnnwfh3.jpg~original

Image Editing OK

Websiteexternal link ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
John_T
Goldmember
John_T's Avatar
Joined Jun 2003
Switzerland
Apr 22, 2017 12:40 as a reply to digital paradise's post |  #5842

interceptor dood...

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon : 5DIV : 5DS R : 5DIII : 7DII : 40 2.8 : 50 1.4 : 35L : 85L : 100L IS Macro : 135L : 16-35L II : 24-105L IS II : 70-200L II : 100-400L IS II : 1.4x & 2x TC III : 600EX-RT : 580EX : 430EX : G1XII : Markins Q10 & Q3T : Jobu Gimbal : Manfrotto Underware : etc...

LOG IN TO REPLY
NateD
Member
NateD's Avatar
Joined Mar 2015
Tucson, AZ
Apr 22, 2017 18:43 |  #5843

Green Rat Snake found in the Coronado National Forest.

For Herpers this is often a life list snake.


IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2883/33822208570_6eb1511bd8_b.jpg

Just trying to be better than I was yesterday.

LOG IN TO REPLY
dodgyexposure
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2012
Brisbane, Australia
Apr 23, 2017 18:21 |  #5844

NateD wrote in post #18335262 (external link)
Green Rat Snake found in the Coronado National Forest.

For Herpers this is often a life list snake.

Do you mean difficult to find and tick off your list - like a birdwatcher has a list of species he or she has seen?


Cheers, Damien

LOG IN TO REPLY
NateD
Member
NateD's Avatar
Joined Mar 2015
Tucson, AZ
Apr 23, 2017 19:04 |  #5845

dodgyexposure wrote in post #18336206 (external link)
Do you mean difficult to find and tick off your list - like a birdwatcher has a list of species he or she has seen?

Yeah, exactly. Sorry for the poor wording.


Just trying to be better than I was yesterday.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pigpen101
Member
Joined Mar 2017
Apr 23, 2017 20:15 |  #5846

The reviews of this lens are making me want to get it. About 4 years ago I wanted a wildlife/birding lens and was just not impressed with the 100-400mm I IQ. I am the kind of guy who takes a lot of time to research and read reviews before dropping the kind of coin that I have spent on cars!!!! At the time the IQ, the awkward zoom, and "dust pump" reputation turned me off. I ended up with the Sigma 150-500mm zoom. I don't want to offend any Sigma fans so I will be gentle.....JUNK!!! After 6 months I sold it and bought the Canon 400mm L F/5.6 and in 5 minutes I had better images than I did with the Sigma. You guys are making me think about selling this lens and getting the 100-400mm MII. I just love the 400mm so much it is hard for me to believe that a zoom is going to give me the same quality. I shoot sports and know people that have the 400mm F/2.8 but use the F/5.6 during the day because of the size/weight and they feel as though they are not giving up much/any quality. Because I now shoot sports, a zoom would be a great help. I got to use the Canon 200-400mm F/4 w/1.4x converter @ the U.S. Open and is was such a pleasure, amazing!!!. However, at $11,000 it is completely out of the question. Thanks to all the people here that have responded to this thread, it has really helped my decision making.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Choderboy's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
Sydney, Australia
Apr 24, 2017 02:03 |  #5847

Powerful owl (Ninox strenua)
With and without flash.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2908/34235699835_fd2dc061aa_o.jpg

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2929/33425271173_4a6109f730_o.jpg

Dave
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/12185187@N00/ (external link)
1D4, 1DS2, 7D2. Canon, Sigma lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
MatthewK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
Maryland
Apr 24, 2017 05:25 as a reply to Pigpen101's post |  #5848

First: you won't be disappointed by this lens, it's fantastic in almost every way. You'd gain IS and versatility of the zoom over your current prime, at the cost of more weight. But when it comes to IQ vs. a prime, I have zero hesitation in putting this lens up against any prime in my lineup.

Second: you shot photos at the US Open... care to share any photos and/or experiences? When I am not traipsing about in the woods photographing wildlife/bugs, I'm wrapped up in tennis. You've combined my 2 favorite hobbies, so my interest is piqued :)


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
edmidlifecrisis
Goldmember
edmidlifecrisis's Avatar
Joined Jun 2014
Palm Beach County, FL
Apr 24, 2017 15:16 |  #5849

Pigpen101 wrote in post #18336321 (external link)
The reviews of this lens are making me want to get it. About 4 years ago I wanted a wildlife/birding lens and was just not impressed with the 100-400mm I IQ. I am the kind of guy who takes a lot of time to research and read reviews before dropping the kind of coin that I have spent on cars!!!! At the time the IQ, the awkward zoom, and "dust pump" reputation turned me off. I ended up with the Sigma 150-500mm zoom. I don't want to offend any Sigma fans so I will be gentle.....JUNK!!! After 6 months I sold it and bought the Canon 400mm L F/5.6 and in 5 minutes I had better images than I did with the Sigma. You guys are making me think about selling this lens and getting the 100-400mm MII. I just love the 400mm so much it is hard for me to believe that a zoom is going to give me the same quality. I shoot sports and know people that have the 400mm F/2.8 but use the F/5.6 during the day because of the size/weight and they feel as though they are not giving up much/any quality. Because I now shoot sports, a zoom would be a great help. I got to use the Canon 200-400mm F/4 w/1.4x converter @ the U.S. Open and is was such a pleasure, amazing!!!. However, at $11,000 it is completely out of the question. Thanks to all the people here that have responded to this thread, it has really helped my decision making.

I did that, sold my 400 5.6 for the zoom. I really liked the 400 5.6 and it was great for flight shots where the IS is not an issue. The zoom is pretty amazing, though. I often shoot at local wetlands where the birds are accustomed to humans and sometimes get quite close or pop up close by. The zoom is great for those situations-when I had the prime I missed a lot of opportunities. If I was always far away from the subjects then it would not be an issue but I use the zoom feature a lot, whether I am shooting APSC or full frame.

As far as IQ I can't really see much difference between the two at 400mm but it's tough to really be objective when subjects are different so I don't know how valid my observations are. I recently got to use a 400DO as well as a 500 f4 for a couple of afternoons and talk about being blown away, I was by both. I am trying to figure out how to manage one of those beasts now........this never ends, does it?


Ed
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127634200@N05/ (external link)
https://500px.com/edtl (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
johnf3f's Avatar
3,563 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Apr 2010
Wales
Apr 24, 2017 17:06 as a reply to Pigpen101's post |  #5850

Frankly if I only wanted to shoot at 400mm and didn't want to get UP CLOSE and personal the I think the 400 F5.6 L is very good and cheaper. On the other hand if you want to get close and need the versatility of the zoom then I can heartily recommend the 100-400 Mk2!

Nothing is perfect though! Much as I like my 100-400 Mk2 I really miss the "Trombone" zoom of the Mk1. This was much faster and more intuitive also the twist zoom of the Mk2 means that your left hand has to stay in one place - bad for balance. In practice this hampers the handling and stability of this (Mk2) lens which handles/balances badly IMO. Fortunately IS Mode 3 cures this but this is the ONLY lens I have that needs IS. Even my 800mm F5.6 L IS doesn't need IS!

Still the 100-400 is a remarkably good lens (IQ), very versatile and the close focus is excellent for reptiles and larger insects etc.

"One lens to rule them all"? Maybe not - but getting close...............:-)


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,118,675 views & 12730 likes for this thread
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Review WOW!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00731 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.07s
Latest registered member is coneshell
606 guests, 333 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016