Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 27 Apr 2017 (Thursday) 17:03
Prev/next
Poll"Which lens would you prefer"
Canon EF 400mm f2.8L IS USM
18
75%
Canon EF 200mm f1.8L USM
6
25%

24 voters, 24 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 200mm f1.8 Vs 400mm f2.8

 
DJHaze596
Goldmember
DJHaze596's Avatar
1,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined May 2012
Florida
Apr 27, 2017 17:03 |  #1

Creating this for a friend who seems to think most people would choose the 200mm f1.8 Prime over the 400mm f2.8L IS USM. Money aside, Which one would you choose? cast your vote.


Canon C200 | Canon 5D Mark IV | 16-35 f4L IS USM | 24-105mm f4L
50mm STM | 70-200mm f2.8L II | 100-400mmL II | 400mm f2.8L IS USM
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined Oct 2008
*** vanished ***
Post has been edited 7 months ago by CheshireCat.
Apr 27, 2017 17:39 |  #2

As usual, the answer is: depends on what you shoot most.

The 200/1.8 is a focus-by-wire lens, and not serviced by Canon anymore.
The 400/2.8 IS v1 is horribly heavy and requires a monopod.

What about a used 200/2 ?


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
DJHaze596
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
DJHaze596's Avatar
1,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined May 2012
Florida
Apr 27, 2017 17:41 |  #3

CheshireCat wrote in post #18340390 (external link)
As usual, the answer is: depends on what you shoot most.

Both lenses are focus-by-wire, and at least the 200/1.8 is not serviced by Canon anymore.
The 400/2.8 IS v1 is horribly heavy and requires a monopod.

What about a used 200/2 ?

Way to not get it. Put all that aside, Which one would be more beneficial to you.


Canon C200 | Canon 5D Mark IV | 16-35 f4L IS USM | 24-105mm f4L
50mm STM | 70-200mm f2.8L II | 100-400mmL II | 400mm f2.8L IS USM
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV

LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined Oct 2008
*** vanished ***
Post has been edited 7 months ago by CheshireCat.
Apr 27, 2017 20:07 |  #4

DJHaze596 wrote in post #18340392 (external link)
Way to not get it. Put all that aside, Which one would be more beneficial to you.

If I hadn't any lens covering 200mm, and I was forced to choose between the two, then I'd get the 200/1.8 for sure.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
rdalrt
Goldmember
rdalrt's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
The Great White North
Apr 27, 2017 20:31 |  #5

Being a sportsshooter, the 400 2.8 is my moneymaker.


Just Sports Photographyexternal link
My Junk ;)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Tom Reichner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Apr 27, 2017 23:37 |  #6

The 400 f2.8 is a no-brainer for me. It is extremely useful for what I shoot, whereas the 200m f1.8 would not be very useful to me at all.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "peace of mind", NOT "piece of mind".

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
47,719 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Post has been edited 7 months ago by CyberDyneSystems.
Apr 27, 2017 23:50 |  #7

I have owned the 200mm 1.8 twice, and still own the 200mm f/2,.

never had or wanted the 400mm :)

I am quite sure that the version of 400mm f/2.8 mentioned in the poll, ie the IS, is not focus by wire. It is mechanical AF just like all of it's generation.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
PCousins
Senior Member
PCousins's Avatar
Joined Nov 2014
Weston-Super-Mare (UK)
Post has been edited 7 months ago by PCousins.
Apr 28, 2017 00:33 |  #8

I would go for the 200mm f/1.8 any day of the week just check out the thread
http://photography-on-the.net ...read.php?t=143434&p​age=87
there are so many uses for this wonderful lens,...It is this thread which helped me decide to buy the 200f/2. I could not find an earlier f/1.8 version to buy as all the people I know who own one will never let them go.


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined Oct 2008
*** vanished ***
Apr 28, 2017 00:54 |  #9

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18340640 (external link)
I am quite sure that the version of 400mm f/2.8 mentioned in the poll, ie the IS, is not focus by wire. It is mechanical AF just like all of it's generation.

You are right: the "IS" version is not a focus-by-wire lens.
I have edited my post.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
Aus.Morgo
Senior Member
Aus.Morgo's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
Newcastle, Australia
Apr 28, 2017 04:08 |  #10

Split the difference, 300 2.8 IS II :)


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
runninmann
what the heck do I know?
runninmann's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
Michigan-U.S.A.
Apr 28, 2017 06:25 |  #11

DJ, I know you said, "Put all that aside," but I wonder if there won't be a certain amount of bias against the 200 because Canon no longer services it. I understand your friend specifically referenced the 1.8, but comparing the current IS version might remove at least a portion of any potential bias.


My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Left Handed Brisket's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Apr 28, 2017 07:18 |  #12

This really is all about the focal lengths, despite trying to convince myself that I need a nice lens over 200mm, I really don't, and if I did, the 100-400 would be more than sufficient.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Formerly he's gone before apostrophe-gate | Not in gear database: Canon 70-210 3.5-4.5, Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 2x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
bildeb0rg's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
uk
Apr 28, 2017 07:45 |  #13

Apples and oranges, 400 can't do f1.8, the f1.8 lens isn't a 400. That said I'd go 400 f2.8 just for the giggles




LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined Oct 2008
*** vanished ***
Apr 28, 2017 10:46 |  #14

bildeb0rg wrote in post #18340833 (external link)
Apples and oranges, 400 can't do f1.8, the f1.8 lens isn't a 400. That said I'd go 400 f2.8 just for the giggles

The 200 is a good 400 with a 2x TC.
The 400 will never be a 200 (and especially as compact).


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Apr 28, 2017 20:03 |  #15

Clearly the 300/1.8 would be the best if one has to decide between these two:

http://www.canonrumors​.com ...ns-we-didnt-know-existed/ (external link)


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

4,723 views & 8 likes for this thread
Canon 200mm f1.8 Vs 400mm f2.8
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00141 for 7 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.12s
Latest registered member is arsurendran
925 guests, 318 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016