Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 06 Dec 2006 (Wednesday) 19:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Wimberley Sidekick with 100-400 and 1D

 
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Dec 06, 2006 19:31 |  #1

Heya folks,

I know the Sidekick is designed for large lenses, but I was just wondering about the feasibility of using the 100-400 with 1D on this setup. It looks possible to me.. and a gimbal would be nice and smooth compared to locking and unlocking a traditional ballhead. My existing setup is Arca compatible so there should be no issue there.

Has anybody tried this? Or is the Sidekick best left for a large tele prime?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Glenn.B
Senior Member
Avatar
448 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
     
Dec 07, 2006 07:06 |  #2

Lightstream,
i think you would find the sidekick a pain to use with the 100-400mm, as it is designed to work best with the camera/lens set to neutral balance so that it stays pointing in the direction you want.

Because the 100-400mm lens is push-pull you would have to keep adjusting the position of the lens to sidekick. because of the change in centre of gravitiy.

If you plan to leave it set to one focal lenth EG:400mm then it would sort of work, but is probley not the best option.

I have both the sidekick and the full wimberly mkII, and neither are comfortable the use with 100-400mm. but GREAT with a 500mm.

Hope the answers you question?


Glenn
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
THREAD ­ STARTER
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Dec 07, 2006 07:13 |  #3

Thanks Glenn, it does. Agreed that one would probably have a lot of re-adjusting to do with the 100-400's changing center of gravity (CG).. would probably lock-it-and-leave-it though.

What would you recommend for the 100-400? Just a plain ballhead?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn.B
Senior Member
Avatar
448 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
     
Dec 07, 2006 07:23 as a reply to  @ Lightstream's post |  #4

Lightstream,

I use a Kirk B1 ball head, which works fine with the 100-400mm, and the if at some time you get a telephoto prime then a sidekick will work well with this ballhead.


Glenn
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,853 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Feb 2003
Location: ABE, PA USA
     
Dec 07, 2006 08:00 |  #5

Lightstream wrote in post #2363967 (external link)
Heya folks,

I know the Sidekick is designed for large lenses, but I was just wondering about the feasibility of using the 100-400 with 1D on this setup. It looks possible to me.. and a gimbal would be nice and smooth compared to locking and unlocking a traditional ballhead. My existing setup is Arca compatible so there should be no issue there.

Has anybody tried this? Or is the Sidekick best left for a large tele prime?

I can't think of any reason why you can't use the Sidekick with the 100-400. As you said, you would probably have it set at 400mm anyway. And besides, even if you didn't, balance is NOT that crucial with the 100-400/1d combo. It's not like we're talking about a very heavy object that needs to have the weight neutralized in order for you to be able to use it. :)

Just my 2 cents but I think the sidekick would be a better option than a ballhead by itself. I've used my 100-400 on a ballhead and swore off of it after that. I switched to the Manfrotto gimbal-type head and then to the Winberley full head. But then again, it also depends on what you're going to be using the lens for. If it's just going to be set on the tripod and locked, then a ballhead will do just fine. But I'm going to assume that's not the case if you are looking at the Sidekick. :)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
THREAD ­ STARTER
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Dec 07, 2006 08:19 |  #6

Thanks Leo, I might give it a try if I can part with the $250. Wildlife, birds and action typically are not so kind as to sit in one place and let me take my time, otherwise I'd simply use my existing Arca B1 workalike (not the real thing, but pretty good stuff either way) - park it on top of that and leave it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn.B
Senior Member
Avatar
448 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
     
Dec 07, 2006 10:44 as a reply to  @ Lightstream's post |  #7

Lightstream,
My original answer was based on using a 100-400mm + 20d with grip, as you have a 1d, i've just been and tried my 100-400mm + 1dmkIIn(which should be compareable to your set up ) all i can say is it felt weird and un balanced, even when locked at 400mm.

I do not know where your based but would suggest you try to contact some near to you that may let you try a sidekick with your lens and camera, then if it works for you, question answered.

would hate for you to make an expensive mistake ;)


Glenn
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonshooter4life
Senior Member
974 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
     
Dec 07, 2006 15:02 |  #8

Just a question but how does the sidekick work i think i read somewhere that you need a ball head for it??

Thanks

Brandon


Brandon

Gear: Canon 60D, Canon 400mm f5.6L, Nifty Fifty, Canon 580EX, Kenko tube set, Kenko Pro 1.4X TC (coming next), Bushhawk, Manfrotto 055 ProB, and Manfrotto 322 grip head.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
Avatar
8,405 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Dec 07, 2006 15:10 |  #9

canonshooter4life wrote in post #2367637 (external link)
Just a question but how does the sidekick work i think i read somewhere that you need a ball head for it??

Thanks

Brandon

you do need a ball head with an arca setup. pretty much all you do is put the ball head in the vertical orientation and than just put the sidekick on it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
THREAD ­ STARTER
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Dec 07, 2006 19:24 |  #10

Glenn, that is a very good point.. I should find a place where I can actually try it before I commit to buying it. $250 purchased blind over the Internet could be a costly lesson if resale proves difficult ;)

I might try a lighter body to balance it out as well, my 1D is currently the heaviest rig I use but I have a couple of small ones too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Dec 2004
     
Feb 04, 2007 21:27 as a reply to  @ Lightstream's post |  #11

I use the 100-400 and a 20D on a Sidekick and I'm very happy with the arrangement. I use it for zoo photography and for birds. Yeah, it doesn't balance well when the lens is extended, but will balance when the lens is closed up. And it takes just a quick twist to lock the gimbal when I'm not shooting.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VanDyck
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2011
     
Apr 30, 2017 14:41 as a reply to  @ JWright's post |  #12

Recently, in the process of researching ball head options to replace my Manfrotto 3030 pan/tilt head, I also stumbled upon the Wimberely Sidekick, shown here with a Canon 100-400mm.

The Sidekick balanced with the lens pulled out to 400mm, requires very little tension on the large tilt knob when changing focal length.

I'm very pleased with the flexibility of this setup.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon EOS 6D EOS 5D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM EF 16-35 f/4 L IS USM | Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4.0 Di LD SP Aspherical (IF)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,517 views & 1 like for this thread
Wimberley Sidekick with 100-400 and 1D
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is insurfr
727 guests, 377 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.