Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 02 Nov 2009 (Monday) 01:07
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 ZE

 
2cruise
Goldmember
2cruise's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
May 21, 2017 15:24 |  #1126

^^^
Oh this is so nice!


5D Mark IV~70-300mm f4L IS~16-35 f4L IS ~Zeiss 21mm 2.8~Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro-Planar
~Rokinon 14mm~2.8~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
May 21, 2017 16:14 |  #1127

2cruise wrote in post #18359872 (external link)
^^^
Oh this is so nice!

Thank you! I had a really good 4-5 hours to shoot around there over the weekend. I had a great time and got aome oretty good images i think.


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
May 23, 2017 18:25 |  #1128


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
May 31, 2017 11:30 |  #1129


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
Goldmember
2cruise's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
Jun 28, 2017 12:32 |  #1130

I don't understand why folks are not using Zeiss lens.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4240/34784044233_8cb77117e8_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/UZKj​uz] (external link)Reuben Creek (external link) by Whisle (external link)

5D Mark IV~70-300mm f4L IS~16-35 f4L IS ~Zeiss 21mm 2.8~Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro-Planar
~Rokinon 14mm~2.8~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Jun 28, 2017 12:49 |  #1131

2cruise wrote in post #18389009 (external link)
I don't understand why folks are not using Zeiss lens.

Lack of autofocus and poor communication with the focus confirmation 'blinkie' make it hard to use when LiveView is not an option.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
Jun 30, 2017 09:11 |  #1132

Alveric wrote in post #18389029 (external link)
Lack of autofocus and poor communication with the focus confirmation 'blinkie' make it hard to use when LiveView is not an option.

That is partly true regarding the auto-focus. I've found that the focus confirmation works just fine if you use the MFA just like you would on an autofocus lens. You basically focus it with live view or another method, and adjust the MFA until you are getting the focus confirmation at that point.


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
Goldmember
2cruise's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
Jun 30, 2017 09:48 |  #1133

I'm happy to be using a lens that many others find is too much work involved. The results far out weigh the convenience of auto focus and I can remember back in the day when everything was manual and using a light meter was a must.


5D Mark IV~70-300mm f4L IS~16-35 f4L IS ~Zeiss 21mm 2.8~Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro-Planar
~Rokinon 14mm~2.8~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
Jun 30, 2017 09:57 |  #1134

2cruise wrote in post #18390793 (external link)
I'm happy to be using a lens that many others find is too much work involved. The results far out weigh the convenience of auto focus and I can remember back in the day when everything was manual and using a light meter was a must.

The one that really blows my mind is the lack of users of the 15mm. There aren't many options in that range that will allow you to use filters, and it can be ordered direct without the built-in hood now. It's a little more challenging to compose with, but where you need that wide perspective it is great. It's probably my 2nd most used lens, with the 35 being third.


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Jun 30, 2017 13:22 |  #1135

2cruise wrote in post #18390793 (external link)
I'm happy to be using a lens that many others find is too much work involved. The results far out weigh the convenience of auto focus and I can remember back in the day when everything was manual and using a light meter was a must.

Yeah, yeah. Back then we'd also have split focusing screens which were better for manual focus than the ones cameras come with now. I have an all-manual, all mechanical film camera with one such screen and I don't have focusing problems on that one. Yes, I know Canon has split focusing screens for DSLRs but they only work properly on 1Dx bodies. vmad

jcothron wrote in post #18390770 (external link)
That is partly true regarding the auto-focus. I've found that the focus confirmation works just fine if you use the MFA just like you would on an autofocus lens. You basically focus it with live view or another method, and adjust the MFA until you are getting the focus confirmation at that point.

I've tried that too. Heck, I got a Spyder LensCal tool to calibrate it, but surprisingly, the lens seems to require no calibration. I think the focus confirmation has a range or something, which doesn't work very well when you're using very large apertures. Even with careful LiveView shooting I've ended up with the focus in the wrong place. See for yourself:

http://diamantstudios.​ca ...eiss_missed_focus-001.jpg (external link)

Using LiveView, I focused on the pharmacist's eyes, yet she came out a mite blurry whilst the focus ended up on the cup on the table, whose lettering is the sharpest point in the image, followed by the back of the computer monitor. :rolleyes:

Here's another example: the MFA 'confirmed' that the focus was on the priest's face, yet he's soft, the woman to the right (the second in importance in this shot) is horribly blurry and the lady in the back is pin sharp. :rolleyes:

IMAGE: http://diamantstudios.ca/Gemeines/Bilder/Examples/Zeiss_missed_focus-002.jpg

It's a hit or miss when using large apertures and the viewfinder. In other instances the lens performs very well, and I love the 3-D-like 'Zeiss look'.

I've considered selling the lens because of all that inconsistency with focusing. Yet, three things stop me: it was a birthday gift from my mum, it has superior optics, and you never get the real value of the thing when you sell it as used. Guess I'll keep it. Some use I'm likely to find for it.

'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
Jun 30, 2017 13:31 as a reply to Alveric's post |  #1136

wow, that is pretty significant! Not sure what's going on there. I don't use my Zeiss lenses for those kind of subjects a lot but on the few occasions I have that is not something I've seen. What body are you using? That shouldn't make a difference just curious.


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Jun 30, 2017 13:35 |  #1137

jcothron wrote in post #18391019 (external link)
wow, that is pretty significant! Not sure what's going on there. I don't use my Zeiss lenses for those kind of subjects a lot but on the few occasions I have that is not something I've seen. What body are you using? That shouldn't make a difference just curious.

5D Mk II.

I've had soft subjects with other lenses as well. So I tried reviewing my technique, and tested the lenses with the LensCal, but they all came out fine. I'm starting to suspect the camera. :(


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
Goldmember
2cruise's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
Jun 30, 2017 13:35 |  #1138

jcothron wrote in post #18390803 (external link)
The one that really blows my mind is the lack of users of the 15mm. There aren't many options in that range that will allow you to use filters, and it can be ordered direct without the built-in hood now. It's a little more challenging to compose with, but where you need that wide perspective it is great. It's probably my 2nd most used lens, with the 35 being third.

With SS my only income the 15 will require a lot of saving but it's the next Zeiss on my list.


5D Mark IV~70-300mm f4L IS~16-35 f4L IS ~Zeiss 21mm 2.8~Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro-Planar
~Rokinon 14mm~2.8~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Jul 02, 2017 03:13 |  #1139

Well, you guys made me choose this lens for Canada Day's fireworks.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4070/35625404036_0b74244d29_o.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Wh6v​s5] (external link)Shooting Angel (external link) by Henry Godnitz (external link), on Flickr

'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
Goldmember
2cruise's Avatar
Joined Jan 2009
Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
Jul 02, 2017 06:51 as a reply to Alveric's post |  #1140

^^^
A good choice!


5D Mark IV~70-300mm f4L IS~16-35 f4L IS ~Zeiss 21mm 2.8~Zeiss 50mm f2 Makro-Planar
~Rokinon 14mm~2.8~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

382,627 views & 60 likes for this thread
Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 ZE
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00272 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Molly71
899 guests, 442 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017