Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 16 Jul 2017 (Sunday) 10:09
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Money or usefulness not the issue.

 
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Jul 16, 2017 13:12 |  #16

Neither of these lenses are going to get attention compared to a 1200 F5.6L.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LJ3Jim
Senior Member
LJ3Jim's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
Pacific Northwest
Jul 16, 2017 13:19 |  #17

300 2.8 II. I had one for three years before selling it last summer to help fund a 1DX2. Fabulous lens. To be honest, though, it didn't get much use after I got the 100 - 400 II...

If I could buy a big white at this time, it would be the 500 f/4 II.


Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.

LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
DreDaze's Avatar
17,776 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Joined Mar 2006
S.F. Bay Area
Post has been edited 7 months ago by DreDaze.
Jul 16, 2017 13:41 |  #18

for bragging rights, i'd say the 200f1.8 instead...or the sigma 200-500f2.8:-)


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)
my 366 for 2016 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
22,712 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Joined May 2005
silicon valley
Jul 16, 2017 13:46 as a reply to post 18403348 |  #19

that said i'll take the 300 haha


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, 430exII, gitzo 3542, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
nordlysBW
Senior Member
nordlysBW's Avatar
343 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Jul 16, 2017 15:07 |  #20

Why choose? If bragging is the deal, don't mince it. Get both and get them gold-plated to catch the gawpers' eye.




LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
bildeb0rg's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
uk
Jul 16, 2017 15:27 |  #21

200L for teh win 8-)




LOG IN TO REPLY
notastockpikr
Senior Member
387 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Canada
Jul 16, 2017 15:43 as a reply to post 18403272 |  #22

Why is the 200 f2 rare? My local brick and mortar store has one available now. This lens is a current, in production lens.

Now, if you mean the 200mm f1.8, this lens, in 9+ condition is rare.

Since attention grabbing/sexy is your criteria, the 200mm f2 would be the one. This lens is also pretty sharp.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyndön
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2008
Knoxville, TN
Jul 16, 2017 19:02 |  #23

It probably depends on who you're trying to impress with this silly endeavor.

Photographers? Then yes, the 200L is probably the more exotic of the two.

Non-photographer people?
Then the 300L probably wins. It's bigger, and that's what matters to most non-photographers. I know I get a TON of attention when my 300 comes out. Seems like every random person wants to come and talk to me about it.

That said, my real vote for a "most bragging rights lens" is the famous Zeiss (NASA) 50mm f/0.7 if money is really no object. That's a lens that comes with a story, not just big and flashy. You also said usefulness wasn't an issue, which is a good thing bc you'd have to get a custom mount to be able to use it.


GEAR LIST

LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
Jul 16, 2017 19:07 |  #24

1200 f/5.6, Sigma 200-500 f/2.8, 400 f/2.8 probably in that order, before either of the other two options. I've physically touched the Sigma at the NEC Photography Show, it's a real beast. Unfortunately I didn't get to view either of the Canon options. The big whites were all mounted on a viewing gallery which allowed a view across the show hall. Couldn't get my wheelchair up the steps:cry:.

Alan


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
panicatnabisco
Senior Member
panicatnabisco's Avatar
Joined Apr 2012
san francisco, CA
Jul 16, 2017 21:35 |  #25

Back when I had my 300, people ask me if it was a 600. Now that I have a 400, people ask if it's a 300.

I'd get the 300 based off that experience


Canon 1DX | 6D | 16-35/2.8II | 24/1.4II | 24-70/2.8II | 24-105 | 50/1.8 | 50/1.2 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.2II | 100/2.8 IS macro | 400/2.8 IS | 2xIII
Leica M8.2 | Noctilux 50 f/1 | Elmarit 90/2.8 Cinema BMD Ursa Mini 4k
afimages.net (external link) | Facebook (external link) | flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Jul 17, 2017 01:37 |  #26

john crossley wrote in post #18403278 (external link)
So you are spending FIVE and a HALF GRAND on a lens for no other reason than vanity!!!!

Not really. I'm more into the engineering than the actual picture taking.


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Jul 17, 2017 01:39 |  #27

oingyboingybob wrote in post #18403282 (external link)
Not wishing to offend in any way but this posting is frivolous to say the least. I'm only responding as I currently have the time....normally I would definitely not bother.

Why not?

To simplify the question.
If you were offered a choice of these lenses, which one would you want the most?


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2007
Portsmouth England
Jul 17, 2017 01:42 |  #28

notastockpikr wrote in post #18403485 (external link)
Why is the 200 f2 rare? My local brick and mortar store has one available now. This lens is a current, in production lens.

Now, if you mean the 200mm f1.8, this lens, in 9+ condition is rare.

Since attention grabbing/sexy is your criteria, the 200mm f2 would be the one. This lens is also pretty sharp.

I, like the rest of us, have been to many venues which attract photographers.
In all that time I can't remember seeing a 200L.


Vaginator9000

LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
DreDaze's Avatar
17,776 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Joined Mar 2006
S.F. Bay Area
Jul 17, 2017 01:43 |  #29

fordmondeo wrote in post #18403807 (external link)
Not really. I'm more into the engineering than the actual picture taking.

in that case, just go for the 200-500f2.8...just make sure you handhold it only...and you can save money by skimping on a memory card since the pictures don't matter anyways...just look how bad-ass you'd look:

IMAGE: http://m0.i.pbase.com/o2/36/508836/1/112563670.QTxszeaR.Sigma20050028.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://www.juzaphoto.​com/article.php?l=en&a​rticle=62'] (external link)

Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)
my 366 for 2016 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined Oct 2008
*** vanished ***
Jul 17, 2017 03:26 |  #30

Lyndön wrote in post #18403605 (external link)
That said, my real vote for a "most bragging rights lens" is the famous Zeiss (NASA) 50mm f/0.7 if money is really no object.

Not easy to own one of the 10 copies ever produced :)
I remember that years ago you could rent two of them (50mm and 35mm) to use with a specially modified camera, but it seems that this is not an option anymore.

Even if you could get one, the Zeiss f/0.7 is an APS-C lens and requires a mirrorless camera. The lens embedded a reverse teleconverter to get down to f/0.7, so nothing dramatically fancier than you can achieve nowadays with a 50/1 + a speed booster.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

8,916 views & 28 likes for this thread
Money or usefulness not the issue.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00144 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Joe at Topaz Labs
761 guests, 450 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017