Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 20 May 2008 (Tuesday) 11:09
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM

 
BJ_Nguyen
Senior Member
BJ_Nguyen's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
Atlanta GA
Jul 25, 2017 12:28 |  #4771

Purple Rain :)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Photo from BJ_Nguyen's gallery.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
zeus77
Senior Member
zeus77's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Croatia
Aug 03, 2017 03:24 |  #4772

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
bryzf1
Senior Member
bryzf1's Avatar
Joined Mar 2011
NM
Aug 03, 2017 17:14 |  #4773

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4347/36189337032_4499c1b333_b.jpg

Bryan
1DX | 5D4 | 17-40L | 24-70LII | 35L | 50 1.4 | 85L | 135L | 70-200LII | 200 f/2L
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
rwong2k
Goldmember
rwong2k's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
Coquitlam,BC,Canada
Aug 09, 2017 01:30 |  #4774

EightEleven wrote in post #18378276 (external link)
That background tho!?!?!?! Amazing!

thx for the kind words :)


5DMK3 + Contax CY Lens
http://rw-photography.ca/external link

http://www.facebook.co​m/RwPhotographyVancouv​erexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
scobols's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
Waconia, MN
Aug 28, 2017 08:53 |  #4775

One from an engagement session this past weekend:

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/IMG_8176.png

Scott

www.scottbolster.comexternal link
facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopherm
Senior Member
Christopherm's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Norman, OK
Aug 31, 2017 10:34 |  #4776

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Gear: A lot more than I deserve and a lot less than I want!

LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
Senior Member
jlstan's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
Sep 01, 2017 16:14 |  #4777

Does anyone have experience with this lens using it with the1.4xIII for sports that they could share a review on. AF speed etc.?




LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,126 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Sep 01, 2017 16:20 as a reply to jlstan's post |  #4778

Me... I went 70-200 2.8 -> 300 2.8 IS V1 -> 120-300 2.8 OS non sport -> 200 F2 IS + 1.4xII and then switched to 1.4xIII

AF speed is unchanged and IQ only takes a minor hit. It's IQ w/ the 1.4xIII is on par with the 300 2.8 IS V1 and while the 120-300 @ 300 2.8 is a tad sharper in dead center the 200F2 quickly.... quickly takes over in the midrange, edge and corners.

I used this lens now for 3 seasons of baseball with the 1.4x. one with the V2 and two with the V3.

Stellar combo for sure!


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
scobols's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
Waconia, MN
Sep 01, 2017 16:23 as a reply to jlstan's post |  #4779

I just used it this morning for football with the 1.4x. I probably won't be able to post examples for a few days but I will as soon as I can. I used it on a 7D MkII and it seemed to focus pretty good. My photos were sharper and the focus was faster without, that's a given, but it was still usable with the 1.4x. I used it for a while and then finally decided to just shoot without it and crop the photos later. If you need the reach, a 300mm lens will always be better than the teleconverter.


www.scottbolster.comexternal link
facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,126 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Sep 01, 2017 16:27 |  #4780

SOOC w/ the 1.4xIII

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,126 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Sep 01, 2017 16:29 |  #4781

scobols wrote in post #18442359 (external link)
I just used it this morning for football with the 1.4x. I probably won't be able to post examples for a few days but I will as soon as I can. I used it on a 7D MkII and it seemed to focus pretty good. My photos were sharper and the focus was faster without, that's a given, but it was still usable with the 1.4x. I used it for a while and then finally decided to just shoot without it and crop the photos later. If you need the reach, a 300mm lens will always be better than the teleconverter.

I would agree. It does take a small hit on IQ but AF speed I never noticed any loss even during night games. I do prefer to shoot without the TC but if your looking for 300 the MK2 cannot be beat. That MK2 is top notch and handles any TC great.

But I have dual purpose for my 200/2... portraits/indoor at 200 then outdoor w/ the 1.4x. My alternative would be a 70-200 and a 300 or 400.

It has been said... whatever length you think you need... get the next longest.


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Sep 01, 2017 17:30 |  #4782

jlstan wrote in post #18442355 (external link)
Does anyone have experience with this lens using it with the1.4xIII for sports that they could share a review on. AF speed etc.?

I shot Petit LeMans two years in a row with mostly the 200, with and without the 1.4. Never really noticed any issues.


Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
Senior Member
jlstan's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
Sep 02, 2017 08:14 |  #4783

Thanks for all the great posts. I have been racking my brain between the 200, 300 and 120-300. I shoot sports for a university and also do senior and family shots and of course like everyone else looking for the fast do all lens. I currently shoot the following glass 70-200 mark II, 50 mm F1.2,100-400 version I, 200mm 2.8 and a 150-600 Sigma Sport. Also have a 1.4xIII to mix things up. My gut is telling me the 300mm 2.8 Mark II but the120- 300 has my attention too yet 400mm is nice on the soccer field. My main sports are soccer, volleyball,hockey,foot​ball,baseball and softball......lol pretty much everything.

I just shot a soccer night game under the lights last night and once the sky turned off my ISO was cranking to hold my speed up. My 70-200 is all I had at that point.

What would you buy is the question of the day?




LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,126 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Sep 02, 2017 08:29 |  #4784

70-200 is your family shots/senior lens and shorter needs sports lens. You my friend need the 400 2.8. You already have the 1.4xIII and that lens will become an amazing 560mm F4 lens which would benefit you in the sports/big field area under lights. You would gain 1 1/3 stop of ISO drop with that combo.

The 120-300 is great. It's AF speed is noticeably slower but is still rock solid. It will only be slow for you in those oh crap moments when your picking the camera up to capture an action shot and the focus is at one end of the other... you'll miss the shot. Canon on the other hand nails it. If the focus is close to where it needs to be before you start you'll get it. The center sharpness is excellent on the 120-300 but falls off in the midrange/edge/corner..​. it's NOT noticeable until you compare next to the 200/300/400 whites of canon and then you'll see how well the canons hold sharpness throughout.

I've payed attention to alot of sport photographers including college and high school and one thing you always see... 70-200 and 300 2.8 or 400 2.8. Since you mention baseball/softball/fooo​tball/soccer = 400 2.8 Volleyball = 200-300 and hockey is more of a 200-300 also and both of these the 200/2 would be great for since these are indoor lower light venues.

See I'm taking different approach. 200/2 + 1.4 to handle all my 200/300 needs and wanting to pickup a 400 2.8 to handle all my 400/560 needs.

The only negative I see is the 400 2.8 IS V1 is no longer being serviced by CPS which you doing what you are doing that may leave you wanting the II = 8k on the used market.


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
jlstan
Senior Member
jlstan's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
Sep 02, 2017 08:40 as a reply to Talley's post |  #4785

Excellent feedback!! You are using the 200mm in exactly the way that I was thinking I could do
. it's just tough seeing I have 200mm already covered. $8000 is a touch out of my range but the 300mm mark II is.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,284,595 views & 798 likes for this thread
Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00607 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.06s
Latest registered member is BradMD96
848 guests, 386 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016