Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk
Thread started 20 Mar 2016 (Sunday) 15:56
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Rokinon 14mm for Night Skies?

 
cutwater
Goldmember
cutwater's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
near Saratoga Springs, NY
Jul 28, 2016 07:07 as a reply to post 18079826 |  #16

Some people use the Rokinon 24mm 1.4 and say it's great. Yes, it's not as wide but you could shoot a few images and stitch them to get the width.


Websiteexternal link flickrexternal link 500pxexternal link FaceBookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
NickWell24
Member
Joined Sep 2014
Jul 28, 2016 08:02 as a reply to cutwater's post |  #17

I've also heard the 35 1.4 is a good performer.


Canon 6D, Canon 16-35 f/4L, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L ii, Canon 70-200 f2.8Lii, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 135 2L, Sigma 35 1.4A

LOG IN TO REPLY
TCampbell
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2012
Jul 28, 2016 09:33 |  #18

corduroy wrote in post #18079826 (external link)
Hi All, what would be the next best lens over the Rokinon 14mm for milky way shots? I am trying to rent one for a star party and it's already reserved. Thanks!

Rental agencies that I'm aware of include BorrowLenses.com and LensRentals.com -- so you might be able to get one from an alternate source. There are certainly more sources (one of my in-town camera stores rents lenses.)

Barring that, you mostly want "low focal ratio" lenses. It turns out if you do the math, an f/1.4 lens collects four times more light (each 1 second that the shutter is open at f/1.4 you collect as much light as you do in having the shutter open for 4 seconds using an f/2.8 lens) -- so even though a 24mm f/1.4 isn't as "wide" and that means that if you aren't on a tracking head you can't expose as long, you'll actually still collect more light than you could with the 14mm.

If you have (or can rent) a tracking head... you can go much much longer.

Tracking heads include models such as:
- iOptron SkyTracker
- SkyWatcher Star-Adventurer
- Vixen Polarie
- AstroTrac
- Losmandy StarLapse

If your rental outfit has any of those devices (they all attach to standard photographic tripods -- preferably a nice beefy / solid tripod) then you can use longer lenses.




LOG IN TO REPLY
airbuko
Mostly Lurking
airbuko's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Bialystok, Poland
Aug 15, 2016 13:27 |  #19

I use Samyang (European version of Rokinon) 14mm f/2.8 I do like it for night shots.

This is example

IMAGE: http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k289/airbuko/7W3A4636_zpscsadrgmg.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://s91.photobucket​.com ...4636_zpscsadrgmg.jp​g.html] (external link)

amor patriae nostra lex

LOG IN TO REPLY
hoorayswag
Member
33 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Oct 27, 2016 19:51 |  #20

Rokinon 14mm is the best lens deal I've bought since the nifty 50




LOG IN TO REPLY
WildImages
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
Post has been edited 8 months ago by WildImages.
Feb 02, 2017 09:05 |  #21

Whatever lens you get, use live view to focus at night. You can crank up the ISO, open live view at 10X, and critically focus. Then, turn down your ISO and go for it.

Critically focus on a star. Rock back and forth across focus to make sure you are spot on.

I recommend the 24 f1.4 for your night work. The true aperture of the 14mm f2.8 is roughly 3 (14/2.8). The true aperture of the 24 is roughly 17 (24/1.4). What this means is the 24 gathers (17/3)^2 or roughly 25 times more light than the 14mm lens which actually gathers about half the light of a human eye.

With the 24mm, you will see lots more stars with the same exposure time. Without tracking you can expose for approximately 10 seconds with the 24 without trailing. With the 14, about 16 seconds. This narrows the gap a bit, perhaps half, but the 24 still leads.

That is my input but YMMV. Good luck!




LOG IN TO REPLY
repete7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
repete7's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
Feb 11, 2017 17:14 |  #22

WildImages wrote in post #18262480 (external link)
I recommend the 24 f1.4 for your night work. The true aperture of the 14mm f2.8 is roughly 3 (14/2.8). The true aperture of the 24 is roughly 17 (24/1.4). What this means is the 24 gathers (17/3)^2 or roughly 25 times more light than the 14mm lens which actually gathers about half the light of a human eye.

I hadn't heard of that before. Thanks for educating me. I have picked up a Samyang 14mm for cheap since posting this, but will put the 24 f/1.4 on my wish list.


Karen Flickr (external link)
Canon 6D2|Canon Eos-m|Canon SL1|Canon ef-m 11-22|Canon ef-m 22|Samyang 14mm f/2.8|Canon 24 stm|Canon 40 stm|Canon 50 f/1.8 stm|Canon FD 50mm macro|Canon Macro 100L|Canon 10-18 stm|Canon 55-250 stm|Canon 24-105L IS USM II|Canon 70-300 IS II USM|Canon 100-400L|

LOG IN TO REPLY
curiousgeorge
Goldmember
curiousgeorge's Avatar
3,830 posts
Joined Feb 2006
London
Feb 28, 2017 14:29 as a reply to airbuko's post |  #23

Great shot, but interesting to note the coma effects in the upper corners, where the stars appear stretched. It's common for ultra wides, but I heard this lens handles it better than the Canon 14mm.


Photos from Iceland (external link) | Lake District (external link) | Isle of Lewis (external link) | Macros (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon 24-70mm f/4L | Canon 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS | Canon 70-200mm f/4L | Speedlite 430EX II | Canon Powershot G9

LOG IN TO REPLY
johnsonjpj
Member
34 posts
Joined Feb 2017
Mar 13, 2017 14:17 |  #24

I've used the 14mm and love it, although sometimes i wouldn't mind a zoom like 10-20, but I always figure I can just crop in post to get my desired composition.




LOG IN TO REPLY
TomCruise06
Member
Joined Jun 2017
Sep 05, 2017 23:26 as a reply to johnsonjpj's post |  #25

Can you guys please look at this thread and share your thoughts?

http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​485983

Thanks for your time.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

5,770 views & 13 likes for this thread
Rokinon 14mm for Night Skies?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0019 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Allyn
839 guests, 410 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016