Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras
Thread started 09 Jun 2017 (Friday) 10:57
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)

 
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Sep 07, 2017 10:42 |  #4321

navydoc wrote in post #18446602 (external link)
Mark Galer


He also has a video on his recommended best Sony Alpha Settings for Action Photography.

gonna watch that tonight as I start to gear up for the HSR races next weekend...fully credentialed this time!:-D


Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
invi2003
Goldmember
invi2003's Avatar
Joined Mar 2007
New York
Sep 07, 2017 11:16 |  #4322

digital_AM wrote in post #18446608 (external link)
Thank you. There are several good options that cover this ultra wide focal length (Laowa, Voightlander, Sony FE 12-24, etc).

and at the moment I can't afford any of them :-P.


Canon EOS 6D | Sony α6000 / ILCE-6000, α7 II / ILCE-7M2, α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Apple iPhone 7 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di VC USD | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 40mm f/2.8 STM, EF 35mm f/2, EF 35mm f/1.4L USM | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC | Sony E PZ 3.5-5.6/16-50mm OSS, FE 28mm F2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, FE 85mm F1.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor 135mm f/2.8, MC Rokkor 55mm f/1.7 | Helios 58mm f/2 44-3 MC | Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN | C |

LOG IN TO REPLY
WillMeades
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2011
Millbrook, Alabama
Sep 07, 2017 12:45 |  #4323

A couple of test shots this past weekend with my a7r2 and 85 1.4. We were playing with some lighting.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Sony DSC-RX10, α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD | Sony FE 28mm F2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, FE 85mm F1.4 GM | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
West Point, Georgia
Sep 07, 2017 12:52 |  #4324

navydoc wrote in post #18446602 (external link)
Mark Galer reviews the Sony FE 100-400GM lens.




He also has a video on his recommended best Sony Alpha Settings for Action Photography.

Thanks a bunch for posting these Gene...just what I needed.

I just arrived at Tallulah Gorge State Park, which I am hoping will serve as a good landscape setting for the 100-400mm. Will be determining if I prefer staying small/light with Batis 135mm, or if the amazing range of 100-400mm proves tremendously useful.


David | Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
West Point, Georgia
Sep 07, 2017 12:53 |  #4325

WillMeades wrote in post #18446720 (external link)
A couple of test shots this past weekend with my a7r2 and 85 1.4. We were playing with some lighting.


thumbnailHosted photo: posted by WillMeades in
./showthread.php?p=184​46720&i=i154797224
forum: Sony Cameras
thumbnailHosted photo: posted by WillMeades in
./showthread.php?p=184​46720&i=i120226831
forum: Sony Cameras

These are beautifully well-done Will. Great work. :)


David | Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
WillMeades
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2011
Millbrook, Alabama
Sep 07, 2017 12:57 |  #4326

David Arbogast wrote in post #18446725 (external link)
These are beautifully well-done Will. Great work. :)

thanks...I had a blast working with this model and being able to test some different (for me) lighting! I don’t post a lot out here but I lurk around quite a bit trying to pick up as many pointers as I can. I’ve learned a lot but have a long way to go. My model for this was such a pleasure to work with and we’ll be doing some more shooting together.


Sony DSC-RX10, α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD | Sony FE 28mm F2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, FE 85mm F1.4 GM | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Sep 07, 2017 13:12 |  #4327

WillMeades wrote in post #18446720 (external link)
A couple of test shots this past weekend with my a7r2 and 85 1.4. We were playing with some lighting.


thumbnailHosted photo: posted by WillMeades in
./showthread.php?p=184​46720&i=i120226831
forum: Sony Cameras

Any chance you shot this one without the wine glass...for some reason I find the glass distracting, in what is otherwise a fantastic image. Love the rendering of the 85GM...soon...soon...g​otta have it...


Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
WillMeades
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2011
Millbrook, Alabama
Post has been edited 18 days ago by WillMeades.
Sep 07, 2017 13:21 |  #4328

TRhoads wrote in post #18446742 (external link)
Any chance you shot this one without the wine glass...for some reason I find the glass distracting, in what is otherwise a fantastic image. Love the rendering of the 85GM...soon...soon...g​otta have it...

I just looked through my shots and I don’t see any. We’ll be shooting again soon...no wine glass! :)

BUT...here’s a link to the shots I kept. We were mainly just testing lighting this time around, so not all would be keepers.

http://www.willmeadesp​hoto.com/Clients/Amber​Murray/ (external link)


Sony DSC-RX10, α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD | Sony FE 28mm F2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, FE 85mm F1.4 GM | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
West Point, Georgia
Post has been last edited 18 days ago by David Arbogast. 2 edits done in total.
Sep 07, 2017 14:04 |  #4329

My 100-400mm experience has taken a turn. Some thoughts:

1. So far I've been unsuccessful in finding compelling landscapes at longer than 135mm. Either the framing doesn't work or the humid haze that permeates the air in the SE USA kills the shot. The otherwise helpful "dehaze" slider in ACR & LR isn't much help in these long shots.

2. I had great opportunities to shoot some birds yesterday and I got several nice captures.....and I just. could. not. care. less. Never gonna be my thing.

3. The 100-400mm is really sharp (for a zoom)...it is a superb amazing product by Sony.

4. I just took a quick half-mile moderate trail lugging the 100-400mm and Loxia 21mm. As I had worried the weight is an absolute turn-off.

5. As of now the 100-400mm is safely secured for the day unless I find something to shoot that needs longer than 135mm. My attitude has now switched to returning it (& keeping the optically superior & 1/3 weight Batis 135).

6. Absolutely 100% happy with my decision to buy the lens, but it's not looking like the best fit for my interests.

7. No decisions have been made, but wanted to share my updated thoughts on 100-400mm ownership.


David | Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
larsey
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Sep 2017
Sep 07, 2017 14:26 |  #4330

This blond girl is so beautiful, my God!


To want to, is to be able to.

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
digital_AM's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Texas
Sep 07, 2017 14:30 |  #4331

David Arbogast wrote in post #18446783 (external link)
My 100-400mm experience has taken a turn. Some thoughts:

1. So far I've been unsuccessful in finding compelling landscapes at longer than 135mm. Either the framing doesn't work or the humid haze that permeates the air in the SE USA kills the shot. The otherwise helpful "dehaze" slider in ACR & LR isn't much help in these long shots.

2. I had great opportunities to shoot some birds yesterday and I got several nice captures.....and I just. could. not. care. less. Never gonna be my thing.

3. The 100-400mm is really sharp (for a zoom)...it is a superb amazing product by Sony.

4. I just took a quick half-mile moderate trail lugging the 100-400mm and Loxia 21mm. As I had worried the weight is an absolute turn-off.

5. As of now the 100-400mm is safely secured for the day unless I find something to shoot that needs longer than 135mm. My attitude has now switched to returning it (& keeping the optically superior & 1/3 weight Batis 135).

6. Absolutely 100% happy with my decision to buy the lens, but it's not looking like the best fit for my interests.

7. No decisions have been made, but wanted to share my updated thoughts on 100-400mm ownership.

There is nothing like testing a lens for yourself to see if it meets your needs. Thanks for sharing your thoughts David. Batis 135 is still an amazing lens. I'm torn on selling my Batis 18 f2.8 for either the CV15mm f4.5 or Laowa 15mm f2.0. I'm getting the CV12mm for sure but am undecided between the gap to my Loxia 21mm.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA |

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,360 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Sep 2007
Sep 07, 2017 15:00 |  #4332

David Arbogast wrote in post #18446783 (external link)
My 100-400mm experience has taken a turn. Some thoughts:

1. So far I've been unsuccessful in finding compelling landscapes at longer than 135mm. Either the framing doesn't work or the humid haze that permeates the air in the SE USA kills the shot. The otherwise helpful "dehaze" slider in ACR & LR isn't much help in these long shots.

2. I had great opportunities to shoot some birds yesterday and I got several nice captures.....and I just. could. not. care. less. Never gonna be my thing.

3. The 100-400mm is really sharp (for a zoom)...it is a superb amazing product by Sony.

4. I just took a quick half-mile moderate trail lugging the 100-400mm and Loxia 21mm. As I had worried the weight is an absolute turn-off.

5. As of now the 100-400mm is safely secured for the day unless I find something to shoot that needs longer than 135mm. My attitude has now switched to returning it (& keeping the optically superior & 1/3 weight Batis 135).

6. Absolutely 100% happy with my decision to buy the lens, but it's not looking like the best fit for my interests.

7. No decisions have been made, but wanted to share my updated thoughts on 100-400mm ownership.

I share similar thoughts after owning the 100-400 canon and 70-400 sony. The 100g weight savings with the GM isnt enough, and the size is a bear.

I'm not even fully convinced with the size of the 100-300, but I'm trying to live with it. Not too many smaller lenses with that sort of range.


Sony A7r - A7ii - A7rii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CY 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
digital_AM's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Texas
Post has been edited 18 days ago by digital_AM.
Sep 07, 2017 15:09 |  #4333

Charlie wrote in post #18446808 (external link)
I share similar thoughts after owning the 100-400 canon and 70-400 sony. The 100g weight savings with the GM isnt enough, and the size is a bear.

I'm not even fully convinced with the size of the 100-300, but I'm trying to live with it. Not too many smaller lenses with that sort of range.

I'm strongly considering the Canon 70-200 f4 Non-IS as my tele lens. Anyone use one here on their a7 body? Yes I would need to use the Metabones adapter but the lens is relatively light and perhaps slightly sharper than the Sony FE 70-200 f4.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA |

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,360 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Sep 2007
Sep 07, 2017 15:26 |  #4334

digital_AM wrote in post #18446815 (external link)
I'm strongly considering the Canon 70-200 f4 Non-IS as my tele lens. Anyone use one here on their a7 body? Yes I would need to use the Metabones adapter but the lens is relatively light and perhaps slightly sharper than the Sony FE 70-200 f4.

I've owned the non IS version, and I'm pretty sure it's as big as the zeiss 100-300, probably not as heavy? It should be pretty close once adapted though.

hell of a bargain for sure and probably better than the zeiss when it comes to flare..... but I'de rather have the 300 than 70, since I already have 70 covered by something else.


Sony A7r - A7ii - A7rii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CY 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
xpfloyd
Cream of the Crop
xpfloyd's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Glasgow, Scotland
Sep 07, 2017 15:29 |  #4335

David Arbogast wrote in post #18446783 (external link)
My 100-400mm experience has taken a turn. Some thoughts:

1. So far I've been unsuccessful in finding compelling landscapes at longer than 135mm. Either the framing doesn't work or the humid haze that permeates the air in the SE USA kills the shot. The otherwise helpful "dehaze" slider in ACR & LR isn't much help in these long shots.

2. I had great opportunities to shoot some birds yesterday and I got several nice captures.....and I just. could. not. care. less. Never gonna be my thing.

3. The 100-400mm is really sharp (for a zoom)...it is a superb amazing product by Sony.

4. I just took a quick half-mile moderate trail lugging the 100-400mm and Loxia 21mm. As I had worried the weight is an absolute turn-off.

5. As of now the 100-400mm is safely secured for the day unless I find something to shoot that needs longer than 135mm. My attitude has now switched to returning it (& keeping the optically superior & 1/3 weight Batis 135).

6. Absolutely 100% happy with my decision to buy the lens, but it's not looking like the best fit for my interests.

7. No decisions have been made, but wanted to share my updated thoughts on 100-400mm ownership.

Number 2 made me chuckle David, I feel the same way. Hummingbirds, owls and hawks I like, everything else doesn't really do it for me. The only exception was when I was in Africa shooting all the exotic birds I don't usually see but that was a once in a lifetime trip. I agree with others though, you can't beat actually trying a lens to see if it fits your needs


Eddie | flickr (external link)| gear
x100F | α7R II
Voigtlander 4.5/15 | Loxia 2.8/21 | Samyang 1.4/24 | Zeiss 4.5-5.6/100-300
Sony 2/28 | Sony/Zeiss 1.8/55 | Batis 1.8/85

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

143,291 views & 8896 likes for this thread
Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00606 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is gregphotography
924 guests, 424 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016