Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 13 Sep 2017 (Wednesday) 07:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

35mm f2 IS, upgrade to 35L (V1). Worth it?

 
lucky7
Goldmember
Avatar
1,257 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 2781
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Post edited 8 months ago by lucky7. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 13, 2017 07:59 |  #1

Hi there. I've been searching and searching but haven't been able to make up my mind.

I shoot a 5d (mk1) and am still quite happy with it, so there's no 'upgrade' planned, period.

I own 3 lenses - 35 f2 IS, 50 1.8 II, and 85 f1.8. The 35 is on the camera 99% of the time, and I've really grown to appreciate it as a 'do it all' lens. I shoot everything I can with it, but I'm looking for more unique shots (bokeh!).
I shoot everything from landscapes, cars, people, architecture, and so on.

The comparisons I've read are all over the place. Some say the 35 f2 IS is just as good as the 35L (V1) or better - some of those say the Sigma Art is the way to go, while others maintain that the V2 35L is the only upgrade. Others say the old 'L' is still in a different league and beats out the f2 IS. Frankly I think I've read so much I've become even more confused, lol.

Here are my thoughts. Eventually I want a 35L, 85L and 135L. If I were to buy the 35L V1, I'll keep the 35 f2 IS and put it on my 35mm Rebel. OR I could trade in the f2 IS and get the 35L V2.


Any thoughts or tips would be greatly appreciated.

Here's a few examples of what I like to shoot.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4392/36222501213_18719e5251_b.jpg

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4304/35216328124_9cbb3e26f1_b.jpg

I do like to shoot with a shallow DOF, but I find my current 35 best at 2.8.

I do use the IS, though without it I'd just crank the ISO I guess. I have noticed recently the IS motor is noisy when it's cold. Not sure if it has any effect on its functioning. Hard to tell at 35mm on a FF.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4301/35223805733_e96684111f_b.jpg

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4268/34551272770_03e75b4f5a_b.jpg

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4363/36632459866_f7a103acac_b.jpg

-Dane
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/danevan/ (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/11028609@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,560 posts
Likes: 2540
Joined Oct 2015
Location: Bourbon, Indiana - USA
     
Sep 13, 2017 08:20 |  #2

I wouldn't trade my 35 IS for the LII, let alone the first version. The difference between f/1.4 and f/2 is too small to matter very much. The difference between IS and hand-holding at slow shutter speeds can be huge. Love my 35 IS on both formats.


Tom,
Film gear: Elan 7NE / Elan 7 / EOS T2
Yashica FX-D (x2) / 50mm ML f/2 / Sigma Zoom-gamma II 21-35mm f/3.4.2 / Yashica ML 28-85mm f/3.5-4.5 / Tokina 70-210mm ML f/4.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lucky7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,257 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 2781
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
     
Sep 13, 2017 08:43 as a reply to  @ Bassat's post |  #3

Thanks for the response.

Maybe I should rent one of them? My initial plan was to get the 135L first, and now you have me thinking that way again. I can't recall the last time I felt so, 'wishy-washy.'

I really have no complaints, I just want something more. If history tells me anything it's just a sign that I need to work a little harder.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4327/35460191093_c3123aa1a2_b.jpg

Still very welcome to input. Thanks.

-Dane
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/danevan/ (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/11028609@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
5,716 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2632
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 13, 2017 08:59 |  #4

ONLY if you NEED 1.4.

The 35 f2 IS simply kicks ass for it's size/weight/cost. Get the 135L instead.


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 23/35/50 f2 WR - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
Senior Member
533 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 57
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Sep 13, 2017 18:14 |  #5

the 1.4 and 1.4ii are both great lenses. well worth the upgrade for the photo quality. both L lenses have a strong feel to them. professional looking photos, vs the amateur of the f2, which has too much purple when wide open.


28mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,417 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 13, 2017 20:14 |  #6

lucky7 wrote in post #18451152 (external link)
Thanks for the response.

Maybe I should rent one of them? My initial plan was to get the 135L first, and now you have me thinking that way again. I can't recall the last time I felt so, 'wishy-washy.'

I really have no complaints, I just want something more. If history tells me anything it's just a sign that I need to work a little harder.

QUOTED IMAGE

Still very welcome to input. Thanks.

The IQ difference between the 35IS and either 35L is significantly less than the IQ lost when cropping an image from the 85/1.8 out to 135 equivalent. I would get the 135L first.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,681 posts
Gallery: 1085 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 7981
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Sep 13, 2017 21:22 |  #7

Heya,

The 35 F2 IS is sharper and better at pretty much everything over the old V1 35L. But consider the age. If you want the top shelf 35mm, it's the 35L II or the 35 ART. If you just want a great 35mm that is nearly as good as the best stuff, the 35 F2 IS is it. It's that good. But with IS, which the best completely lack.

I use the 5Dc and 35 F2 IS as well. I've had the F1.4 35mm glass. I'd rather have 4 stops of IS than F1.4. The depth of field that you get with F1.4 at 35mm isn't that much more. It's not worth it to me, compared to a lighter, sharper, image stabilized lens.

Best thing to do is just to rent it all and see for yourself.

If you're crazy for thin depth of field, play more with 85mm.

And there's literally nothing unique about thin depth of field shots. Not sure what you're looking for with that particular concept.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
Senior Member
533 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 57
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Sep 14, 2017 00:40 |  #8

The 85mm is a completely different lens than the 35mm. The 85mm should not be in the topic to replace a 35mm.


28mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,417 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 14, 2017 06:45 |  #9

CH_Devin wrote in post #18451772 (external link)
The 85mm is a completely different lens than the 35mm. The 85mm should not be in the topic to replace a 35mm.

May I suggest you go back and re-read or should I say read the OP.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lucky7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,257 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 2781
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
     
Sep 14, 2017 08:31 |  #10

Thank you all very much. I just made a decision and went with my original plan - I ordered a 135L. I can't justify a 35L at this point because I'm not at all unhappy with what I've already got.

Thanks so much for giving me some perspective. No need to spend money just to do it.

The only thing I'm kicking myself for now is that I just now ordered the lens, but I'm going back up north camping tomorrow morning. Lol, derp. Shoulda done it sooner!

Cheers.


-Dane
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/danevan/ (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/11028609@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
5,716 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2632
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 14, 2017 08:38 |  #11

Great choice!


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 23/35/50 f2 WR - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmilo
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Likes: 241
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Albany, NY
Post edited 8 months ago by kmilo.
     
Sep 14, 2017 08:49 |  #12

lucky7 wrote in post #18451987 (external link)
The only thing I'm kicking myself for now is that I just now ordered the lens, but I'm going back up north camping tomorrow morning. Lol, derp. Shoulda done it sooner!

this is the story of my life ... day late and a dollar short .... every time :)


Kris
Insulting critiques always welcomed. flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
strobe ­ monkey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
     
Sep 14, 2017 09:01 |  #13

Now you will want the 85 to fill the gap :)...

Enjoy your new toy...


6D, 7D, EF35 f2, EF50 f1.4, EF50 f1.8
Sold:
EF 70-200 F4, EF 24-105L, EF 24-70L, EF 17-40L, EF 85 f1.8, Stigma 10-20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Goodform
Member
34 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 14, 2017 09:46 |  #14

I have been thinking about a 35L (ver 1) but it sounds like I'm reading here that the 35L II is produces significantly better images? Is the II really worth twice as much?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lucky7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,257 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 2781
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
     
Sep 18, 2017 10:50 |  #15

So far, so good.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4432/36908630550_1a099056ff_b.jpg

-Dane
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/danevan/ (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/11028609@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

22,934 views & 19 likes for this thread
35mm f2 IS, upgrade to 35L (V1). Worth it?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johnowens
661 guests, 334 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.