Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Sep 2017 (Friday) 02:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon DSLRs

 
FuturamaJSP
Goldmember
Avatar
2,227 posts
Likes: 81
Joined Oct 2009
Post edited 8 months ago by FuturamaJSP.
     
Sep 22, 2017 02:49 |  #1

This guy wrote an open letter to Canon complaining about the lack of Canon DSLR innovations since the release of 5D MkII
I wonder why he took his time to write to them when it is apparent that Canon doesn't seem to care since the ignorant consumers are still purchasing their inferior cameras.

http://projectrawcast.​com …pened-to-your-innovation/ (external link)


They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
blah blah blah
DA (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Ramon-uk
Senior Member
608 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 142
Joined Mar 2006
     
Sep 22, 2017 05:04 |  #2

Oh dear, what makes a Goldmember become a troll, are you having a bad day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
7,880 posts
Likes: 453
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Sep 22, 2017 05:58 |  #3

FuturamaJSP wrote in post #18457642 (external link)
This guy wrote an open letter to Canon complaining about the lack of Canon DSLR innovations since the release of 5D MkII

Already discussed at http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1486313




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
3,681 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 313
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
     
Sep 22, 2017 08:32 |  #4

Ramon-uk wrote in post #18457687 (external link)
Oh dear, what makes a Goldmember become a troll, are you having a bad day.

Clearly he's unhappy. Even if he feels strongly on the subject, I wonder why he also felt the need to insult all of us Canon shooters. It's certainly an attempt to start a nasty argument, but I won't bite.


Mark
Canon 7D2, 60D, T3i, T2i, Sigma 18-35 f/1.8, 30 f/1.4. Canon EF 70-200 L f/4 IS, EF 35 f/2 IS, EFs 10-18 STM, EFs 15-85, EFs 18-200, EF 50 f/1.8 STM, Tamron 18-270 PZD, B+W MRC CPL, Canon 320EX, Vanguard Alta Pro 254CT & SBH 250 head. RODE Stereo Videomic Pro, DXO PhotoLab, Elements 15

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Likes: 131
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 22, 2017 09:58 |  #5

I never understood why people take time to continually complain about Canon cameras. There are other camera companies out there. Not happy with Canon, move on to something you consider better. Stop the moaning.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,133 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 5761
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Post edited 8 months ago by saea501.
     
Sep 22, 2017 11:01 |  #6

eddieb1 wrote in post #18457816 (external link)
I never understood why people take time to continually complain about Canon cameras. There are other camera companies out there. Not happy with Canon, move on to something you consider better. Stop the moaning.

Truer words were never spoken.

The months long build up before a new release.....speculatin​g, wishing, hoping.....then the new piece hits the streets and......'waaa, how could Canon be so stupid and not incorporate this feature or that capability into this new camera?'

Then, of course, this crying and complaining goes on for months and months......the 6D sucks because it has no AF......the 6D II sucks because it has no dynamic range. :cry:

Good grief....freaking grow up. Become a real photographer. Learn how to use these incredibly capable pieces of equipment. If you want a camera that can do everything for you and churn out mediocre pictures consistently then just set your T6i (or equivalent) on the green box and enjoy your life.

If you can't take award winning, wall hanging pictures with anything from the T6i on up through Canon's line then the problem is not with the camera.

It is not.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com …282@N06/with/38​203470844/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Likes: 131
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 22, 2017 12:52 |  #7

saea501 wrote in post #18457860 (external link)
Truer words were never spoken.

The months long build up before a new release.....speculatin​g, wishing, hoping.....then the new piece hits the streets and......'waaa, how could Canon be so stupid and not incorporate this feature or that capability into this new camera?'

Then, of course, this crying and complaining goes on for months and months......the 6D sucks because it has no AF......the 6D II sucks because it has no dynamic range. :cry:

Good grief....freaking grow up. Become a real photographer. Learn how to use these incredibly capable pieces of equipment. If you want a camera that can do everything for you and churn out mediocre pictures consistently then just set your T6i (or equivalent) on the green box and enjoy your life.

If you can't take award winning, wall hanging pictures with anything from the T6i on up through Canon's line then the problem is not with the camera.

It is not.

Somehow award winning photographs were taken prior to the introduction of digital cameras.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,133 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 5761
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Sep 22, 2017 13:09 |  #8

eddieb1 wrote in post #18457947 (external link)
Somehow award winning photographs were taken prior to the introduction of digital cameras.


....ah yes.....they were indeed. Imagine that.

How could they have possibly accomplished that? :rolleyes:


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com …282@N06/with/38​203470844/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddieb1
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Likes: 131
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Oregon
Post edited 8 months ago by eddieb1.
     
Sep 22, 2017 15:46 as a reply to  @ saea501's post |  #9

Ahhhhh.......elves?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,547 posts
Likes: 2536
Joined Oct 2015
Location: Bourbon, Indiana - USA
     
Sep 22, 2017 17:45 |  #10

I happen to really like Canon cameras. I shoot Canon because I want to. If you don't, cool beans. Shoot something else. BTW, I read the article. The author doesn't present a coherent argument for his position. As to Canon ignoring its customers, and their desires, since the 5D2, perhaps a look at some sales figures would correct those misconceptions.

My brother shoots Nikon. I am happy for him, and for the fact that he never asks to borrow my gear. I'm just embarrassed for him when we go out together. Nikon cameras are ugly.


Tom,
Film gear: Elan 7NE / Elan 7 / EOS T2
Yashica FX-D (x2) & FX-3 Super 2000 / DSB 28mm f/2.8 / 50mm ML f/2 / 135mm ML f/2.8 / Sigma Zoom-gamma II 21-35mm f/3.4.2 / Yashica ML 28-85mm f/3.5-4.5 / Tokina 70-210mm ML f/4.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,612 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 475
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 23, 2017 00:16 |  #11

TS-E 17mm.

'mic drop'


Edward Jenner
5DIII, 7DII, M6, GX1 II,M11-22, Sig15mm FE,16-35 F4,TS-E 17,Sig 18-250 OS Macro,M18-150,24-105,T45 1.8VC,70-200 f4 IS,70-200 2.8 vII,Sig 85 1.4,100L,135L,400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arthurbikemad
Member
Avatar
90 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Sep 2016
     
Sep 23, 2017 01:48 |  #12

And yet there are people who believe some photographers only take pictures because they have a good Canon camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

16,186 views & 22 likes for this thread
Canon DSLRs
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Angester
681 guests, 314 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.