Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge
Thread started 19 Oct 2017 (Thursday) 15:24
Prev/next
Poll"What year were you born?"
1901-1924
1
1.4%
1925-1942
5
7.2%
1943-1960
34
49.3%
1961-1979
21
30.4%
1980-1998
8
11.6%
1999-2017
0
0%

69 voters, 69 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

How young is everyone?

 
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
joedlh's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
Oct 25, 2017 12:01 |  #46

I'm in my 60's. I not only use computers, but program them.

Speaking from my own experience, I was interested in photography at an early age, but could not get serious about it until my 20's due to the cost. These days, younger folk are satisfied with their smartphone cameras, which are much better than anything I had when I was their age. This forum is for those who are serious about photography and want to improve. That takes time and maturity and it's not for everybody. The ones who gravitate to this forum will not be those who count "likes" on Instagram and Facebook. They'll be the ones who look critically at their photos and wonder how they could be better.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​texternal link
Editing ok

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
dolina
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
dolina's Avatar
4,795 posts
Joined Mar 2009
34109
Post has been edited 4 months ago by dolina.
Oct 25, 2017 12:08 |  #47

Wilt wrote in post #18480749 (external link)
For new gear there MAY be some element of truth in the statement, but even a new T6i would cost $750 with lens at BestBuy, or $580 refurb thru Canon.
And then there is the used market, and a used 60D is $400-450 with lens.

I think the poll might have been 'biased ' from the beginning due to mere demographics ..if you merely poll the general population, the Gausian distribution puts the natural peak in the Baby Boomer category!
And then the yougest category, from 0-18 years?! Just how many teens do you expect to have established themselves firmly as a hobby and having SLRs?! I recall in high school the guys in my year who were photography afficianados...about 1-2% of my year!

The categories are grouped into generations.

G.I. Gen 1901-1924 means from 116 years old down to 93 years old

Silent Gen 1925-1942 means from 92 years old to 75 years old

Baby Boomer 1943-1960 means from 74 years old to 57 years old

Gen X 1961-1979 means from 56 years old to 38 years old

Millennial 1980-1998 means from 37 years old to 19 years old

Gen Z - 1999-2017 means from 18 years old to 0 years old

Source: https://en.wikipedia.o​rg/wiki/Generation#Wes​tern_world (external link)

And to people 37-19 and 18-0 who shoot casually spending more than the price mentioned for a gadget that is limited to recording stills and video is a tough sell. If they could get more utility from it then they may go for it.

In the US headlines I keep reading that millenials and gen z suffer from student loans.


Visit my Flickrexternal link, Facebookexternal link & 500pxexternal link and see my photos. :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
GibJock
Don’t bait the TF, it’ll backfire on you.
GibJock's Avatar
Joined May 2013
From Scotland, living in Gibraltar "A Jock on the Rock"
Oct 25, 2017 12:36 as a reply to dolina's post |  #48

Hey, I’m a baby boomer :eek:


flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
OhLook's Avatar
16,043 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Joined Dec 2012
California: SF Bay Area
Oct 25, 2017 13:30 |  #49

joedlh wrote in post #18480773 (external link)
The ones who gravitate to this forum will not be those who count "likes" on Instagram and Facebook.

Exactly. We count Likes on POTN instead . . .

They'll be the ones who look critically at their photos and wonder how they could be better.

. . . and that's why.

dolina wrote in post #18480784 (external link)
And to people 37-19 and 18-0 who shoot casually spending more than the price mentioned for a gadget that is limited to recording stills and video is a tough sell. If they could get more utility from it then they may go for it.

Solution: build a phone into each camera. :lol:


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS FOR YOU: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.) | IMAGE EDITING OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Wilt's Avatar
39,813 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2005
Belmont, CA
Post has been edited 4 months ago by Wilt.
Oct 25, 2017 14:34 |  #50

OhLook wrote in post #18480758 (external link)
The poll wouldn't be complete if it excluded any age range, and neither having an SLR nor being firmly established is required at POTN.

But one has to be realistic and practical!

Why not a poll with...


  1. 12-30 years
  2. 31-45 years
  3. 46-60 years
  4. 61-75 years
  5. Over 75


And I would not restrict poll to SLR, I was mere talking about practical realism in any camera possession with casual use, hobby, or enthusiast, or generation of income.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
OhLook's Avatar
16,043 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Joined Dec 2012
California: SF Bay Area
Oct 25, 2017 15:37 |  #51

Wilt wrote in post #18480905 (external link)
But one has to be realistic and practical!

Why not a poll with...


  1. 12-30 years
  2. 31-45 years
  3. 46-60 years
  4. 61-75 years
  5. Over 75

That would do, too, but I think dolina's existing poll is realistic and practical; its great advantage is that we already have it.

There actually are a few whiz kids under age 12 who take amazing pictures, using an intuitive understanding of framing, color, and so forth. I'd treat the first category like the last one. Make it "Under 31."


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS FOR YOU: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.) | IMAGE EDITING OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,718 views & 21 likes for this thread
How young is everyone?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00121 for 7 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is mtapes
1024 guests, 445 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017