Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras
Thread started 09 Jun 2017 (Friday) 10:57
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)

 
DTBaan
"male gigolo"
DTBaan's Avatar
13,312 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Joined Apr 2011
Nov 06, 2017 00:54 |  #6856

mystik610 wrote in post #18489504 (external link)
Videographer persistent lights are annoying, but I've learned to try to use them creatively when I can.

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by mystik610 in
./showthread.php?p=184​89504&i=i216165598
forum: Sony Cameras

cool!!

i dont use flash so when the video ppl shine their light at the cake cutting and toast i appreciate it :P

never thought about using them for a back highlight. thanks for the idea :)


"The general rule for flash photography is that you want the flash to go off while the shutter is open" (Titus213)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
10,082 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Aug 2010
West Point, Georgia
Nov 06, 2017 01:01 |  #6857

vinmunoz wrote in post #18489640 (external link)
try to check for chrome's color extension or plugins.

I don’t know what this means. Also I tried Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari (PC), and they all look the same (much different than Photoshop or LR).

DTBaan wrote in post #18489649 (external link)
did you recently reinstall os or ps?

see if you have it save as rgb instead of adobe. rgb should be checked. that seems to work for me.

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by DTBaan in
./showthread.php?p=184​89649&i=i177055001
forum: Sony Cameras

I always convert to sRGB when outputting to web. Also, images look more saturated on the web than they do in Photoshop. I’m puzzled.


David | Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
xpfloyd
Cream of the Crop
xpfloyd's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Glasgow, Scotland
Nov 06, 2017 01:43 |  #6858

David Arbogast wrote in post #18489652 (external link)
I don’t know what this means. Also I tried Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari (PC), and they all look the same (much different than Photoshop or LR).


I always convert to sRGB when outputting to web. Also, images look more saturated on the web than they do in Photoshop. I’m puzzled.

David, the shot you posted there looks good to me in terms of colour but not being able to see the other version might mean I’m missing something (i appreciate you cant post both versions). One thing worth checking is the “proof” view function in photoshop. It’s been a while since I’ve used it so my memory of the finer details is lacking but I used it previously to see what the output would look like of my printer shops printer profile. From memory you should be able to select proof view for srgb and view how it looks within photoshop. If a change is noticed then you know the issue is with the srgb profile/conversion.


Eddie | flickr (external link)| gear
x100F | α7R II
Voigtlander 15 | Zeiss Loxia 21 | Samyang 24 | Contax Zeiss 100-300
Sony 28 | Sony/Zeiss 55 | Zeiss Batis 85 | Sony 90 Macro

LOG IN TO REPLY
DTBaan
"male gigolo"
DTBaan's Avatar
13,312 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Joined Apr 2011
Post has been edited 16 days ago by DTBaan.
Nov 06, 2017 01:46 |  #6859

David Arbogast wrote in post #18489652 (external link)
I don’t know what this means. Also I tried Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari (PC), and they all look the same (much different than Photoshop or LR).

I always convert to sRGB when outputting to web. Also, images look more saturated on the web than they do in Photoshop. I’m puzzled.

im reading this.
https://www.photo.net ...ed-compared-to-lr.513786/ (external link)

and it pointed me to this
https://www.photo.net/​photo/13298873 (external link)

"p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>I'm really impressed by your superb night shots and it's a blessing for me to read your detailed descriptions of your technique. I have never tried to shoot star-trails but it's something I'm very interested in experimenting with when I'll have an opportunity. I just recently read that for long time exposures Velvia 50 wasn't adequate because of the reciprocity failure and that Velvia 100F or Provia 100 were the better Fuji film; I have some Velvia 100 (no "F") in stock, have you made some experience with it? I also want to thank you for answer and explanation on your picture "Chives, version 2" which was also very instructive for me, another thing I'll keep in mind, but I have no experience at all with studio shots.</p>
<p>
<p>Regarding your saturation issue between the web and PS:</p>
<p>it seems that you are using Chrome as web-browser which doesn't have color management as Safari or Firefox does and this might be the reason for your issue. I have found a <a href="http://www.binar​yturf.com/enable-color-management-google-chrome/">link</a> explaining how to turn on color management within Chrome, but I'm not sure how good it works. If you try it out, you can test if the color management works with <a href="http://www.gball​ard.net/psd/go_live_pa​ge_profile/embeddedJPE​Gprofiles.html">this test page</a>. But this test will only tell you if your browser takes the color profile embedded in the pictures into account you can't test there if your browser takes the color profile of your monitor into account. For instance Firefox (which I'm using) doesn't support V4 color profiles and my calibration software produces V4 profiles I had wrong colors in Firefox even if the tests on the second link I provided told me everything worked fine. (I'm converting my profiles from V4 to V2 now for Firefox) Basically as long as you can see a difference between PS and your web browser it means that the color management of the web browser doesn't work properly. One advantage of Firefox is that you can force it to consider sRGB color profile for pictures that are not tagged. I hope this helps.</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Jan</p>
<p> </p>"

i dont get all these though. but the above seems like a browser fix. im wondering why it worked before and why not now. since you said all other pc, mac, has problems. sorry its late and i cant look in it too deep. gotta sleep

good luck


Support this site - donate here

LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
MedicineMan4040's Avatar
Joined Jul 2013
Nov 06, 2017 02:30 as a reply to post 18489632 |  #6860

David, I'm at work...hospital monitors not the greatest...but the colors here look fine. The 'fall' colors are a bit muted like they are up here but they look natural.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
navydoc's Avatar
10,884 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Joined Oct 2009
Inland Empire, So. Cal
Nov 06, 2017 05:42 |  #6861

David Arbogast wrote in post #18489632 (external link)
Lately my colors are all screwed up and I can't figure out what's gone wrong.

I calibrate my monitor with i1 Display Pro. Colors in LR and Photoshop look fine. I always convert to sRGB before saving to web (jpeg). The colors look completely different in Chrome on my PC and Safari on the iPad (iPad always looks better than my PC). Colors appear shifted. The blue sky below looks blue in Photoshop, but shifted to cyan in Chrome.

What am I doing wrong? I don't recall having this issue until the last month or two.

Loxia 21mm:
QUOTED IMAGE

David, I don't know if this helps or not but opening your posted image in PS, I added a Hue/Saturation adjustment layer above it and then grabbing the color picker, clicked in many spots in the sky. The selected color was always blue and no cyan appeared.

I saved your image to my computer while viewing it in my Chrome browser and the colors look fine to me.


Gene - My Photo Gallery ||external link My USS Oriskany websiteexternal link || My Flickrexternal link
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
mystik610's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
Houston, TX
Nov 06, 2017 05:50 |  #6862

vinmunoz wrote in post #18489507 (external link)
Smart move Carlo. Nice shot.


David Arbogast wrote in post #18489508 (external link)
That's a gorgeous shot using the video light Carlo. Impressive work.

DTBaan wrote in post #18489651 (external link)
cool!!

i dont use flash so when the video ppl shine their light at the cake cutting and toast i appreciate it :P

never thought about using them for a back highlight. thanks for the idea :)

Thanks guys! More often than not, those lights are ruining things for me...especially when they don't color correct them! But they're never going away so might as well make use of them.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀII - RX1ʀII - α9 - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sony/Zeiss 35 f1.4 ZA - 85GM - Sony 70-200GM

LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Goldmember
TRhoads's Avatar
Joined Jun 2009
Roswell, Georgia
Nov 06, 2017 08:07 |  #6863

vinmunoz wrote in post #18489565 (external link)
i like both so here it is. another from the A6000+kit lens

Vinz, please don't take this wrong...something about the editing on the color version, the color toning does not flatter them...they feel kinda cold and lifeless...the pose looks like he is choking her too...


Gear List & Feedback | SmugMug Page (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
vinmunoz
Cream of the Crop
vinmunoz's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
California
Nov 06, 2017 08:14 |  #6864

thanks for your feedback but i really like cinematic color grading when i have moody lighting.

regarding the hand. exactly the same feedback i got from my wife. luckily they're both smiling and looking in-love so it helps a bit.


VINZ - SONY A7RII/A6000/FDR-X3000 | 85GM | FE3514 | FE1635F4 |
INSTAGRAM (external link)- WEBSITE (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link) - 500PX (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
WillMeades
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2011
Millbrook, Alabama
Nov 06, 2017 10:42 |  #6865

A few from Early Morning Saturday...with A7R2 and the Sony 55 1.8

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/AmberMurray/AmberCCreekweb/i-THQ5bQL/0/ca80651d/XL/amber_cc_web-124-XL.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.willmeadesp​hoto.com ...mberCCreekweb/i-THQ5bQL/A] (external link)

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/AmberMurray/AmberCCreekweb/i-qhX46XD/0/30201402/XL/amber_cc_web-156-XL.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.willmeadesp​hoto.com ...mberCCreekweb/i-qhX46XD/A] (external link)

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/AmberMurray/WaterMaidenweb/i-sQSstD6/0/cfbea71b/XL/watermaiden-3-XL.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.willmeadesp​hoto.com ...aterMaidenweb/i-sQSstD6/A] (external link)

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/AmberMurray/WaterMaidenweb/i-PZ8Qc3q/0/3eef2716/XL/WaterMaiden-XL.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.willmeadesp​hoto.com ...aterMaidenweb/i-PZ8Qc3q/A] (external link)

Sony DSC-RX10, α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD | Sony FE 28mm F2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, FE 85mm F1.4 GM | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
mystik610's Avatar
Joined Jan 2012
Houston, TX
Nov 06, 2017 10:56 |  #6866

Awesome! That light is killer


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀII - RX1ʀII - α9 - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sony/Zeiss 35 f1.4 ZA - 85GM - Sony 70-200GM

LOG IN TO REPLY
xpfloyd
Cream of the Crop
xpfloyd's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Glasgow, Scotland
Nov 06, 2017 10:58 |  #6867

Awesome photos!!


Eddie | flickr (external link)| gear
x100F | α7R II
Voigtlander 15 | Zeiss Loxia 21 | Samyang 24 | Contax Zeiss 100-300
Sony 28 | Sony/Zeiss 55 | Zeiss Batis 85 | Sony 90 Macro

LOG IN TO REPLY
xpfloyd
Cream of the Crop
xpfloyd's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Glasgow, Scotland
Post has been edited 16 days ago by xpfloyd.
Nov 06, 2017 10:59 |  #6868

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4527/38217856381_91182a6dd0_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/21eb​vdi] (external link)Isla - 06.11.17 (external link) by xpfloyd (external link), on Flickr

Eddie | flickr (external link)| gear
x100F | α7R II
Voigtlander 15 | Zeiss Loxia 21 | Samyang 24 | Contax Zeiss 100-300
Sony 28 | Sony/Zeiss 55 | Zeiss Batis 85 | Sony 90 Macro

LOG IN TO REPLY
WillMeades
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2011
Millbrook, Alabama
Nov 06, 2017 10:59 |  #6869

mystik610 wrote in post #18489923 (external link)
Awesome! That light is killer

thanks...Amber is my favorite (I don’t model) model! She is always a trooper! The water was most likely mid to high 40’s, but we both barreled in. My wife was ready with towels on the bank.


Sony DSC-RX10, α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 | Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD | Sony FE 28mm F2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, FE 85mm F1.4 GM | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
eriet30
Goldmember
eriet30's Avatar
1,869 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2011
Phoenix AZ
Nov 06, 2017 11:37 |  #6870

One should really learn their new camera before using it....... I formatted over my New Orleans photos vmad

Anyway ..... found a new fun place near Page AZ but in Utah.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4511/37464408064_d73c66a052_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Z5AT​h5] (external link)_DSC2520.jpg (external link) by Paul (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4528/24322168498_8cf6d4543d_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: https://flic.kr/p/D4gt​jJ] (external link)_DSC2474.jpg (external link) by Paul (external link), on Flickr

I am loving the A9 and really loving the A9 / A7r2 combo. I ended up pulling out the 55mm more than ever and really loved having the 10mm and 21 on each body switching back and forth when needed.... letting the A7r2 sit on the tripod getting the detail and letting the A9 use its great ISO depth to be handheld. Feeling better about the kit although the 90 macro is now sitting in the bag a lot not sure but maybe I need to dump it.

"Vision is the art of seeing that which is invisible"
http://... flickr (external link) www.paulvanderveen.net (external link)

A9 / A7rII / A6500 (For Sale)) /A6000IR -CV10, Loxia 21, FE28, FE 55, FE90, FE 100-400GM, Rok 8mm Fish, Tam 150-600v1 (For Sale))
Legacy Glass: Canon FD 55 1.2 / Jupiter 9 85mm 1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

256,178 views & 14117 likes for this thread
Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00895 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.16s
Latest registered member is Milla S
916 guests, 498 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016