Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 05 Nov 2017 (Sunday) 16:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Telephoto Lens input - guide me...

 
micco
Member
32 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 05, 2017 16:10 |  #1

Hi All,

I have an 80D on route replacing my XSi, and looking to extend the reach of my current setup.
Currently i have: 1
* 15-85 f3.5-5.6
* 50 f1.8
* 18-55 f3.5-5.6 (XSi kit)

With the kids getting old and into more events, i'd like to get shots from a distance.
From the research I've done so far and my budget <= $500 CAD, here are my considerations:
* Tamron 70-300 f4-5.6 DI VC USD ($300 CAD used)
* Canon 55-250 f4-5.6 IS STM ($250 CAD new, on-sale)
* Canon 70-200 f4L non-IS ($500 CAD used)

My concerns/questions:
* Odd time i'll do video, would the Tamron be silent like the STM?
* non-IS L, would i regret this in lens with the lack of reach (vs 250 and 300) and lack of IS; especially when indoors?

I'm leaning towards the Tamron, as the image quality in reviews seems to be 'comparable' to the f4L, and has higher quality build construction when compared to the 55-250.

Any input or other lens to consider would be appreciated.

Cheers!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
welshwizard1971
Goldmember
1,321 posts
Likes: 916
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southampton Hampshire UK
     
Nov 05, 2017 16:32 |  #2

No IS makes no difference if you're indoors, it's main benefit is it stabilizes camera movement from where you're holding it, and I assume you don't shake any more indoors than out? It makes no difference to the movement of your target. That said, the 70-200 from canon is a cracking lens, and can take a teleconverter, certainly a x1.4 no problem.

Wiki is your friend....

https://en.wikipedia.o​rg/wiki/Image_stabiliz​ation (external link)


5DIII, 40D, 16-35L 35 ART 50 ART 100L macro, 24-70 L Mk2, 135L 200L 70-200L f4 IS
Hype chimping - The act of looking at your screen after every shot, then wildly behaving like it's the best picture in the world, to try and impress other photographers around you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,417 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Nov 05, 2017 23:11 |  #3

I would add the new 70-300 IS USM II to the list but it is going to be hard to get more bang for the buck than the 55-250 STM


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,560 posts
Likes: 2540
Joined Oct 2015
Location: Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Post edited 6 months ago by Bassat.
     
Nov 05, 2017 23:24 |  #4

micco wrote in post #18489408 (external link)
...

* Tamron 70-300 f4-5.6 DI VC USD ($300 CAD used)
* Canon 55-250 f4-5.6 IS STM ($250 CAD new, on-sale)
* Canon 70-200 f4L non-IS ($500 CAD used)

...

I agree with FEChariot's suggestion of the 70-300 USM II.

The Tamron in your list isn't worth $300 used, in any currency. The Canon non-L 70-300 is better optically, and costs less used.

The 55-250 STM is optically better than the Tamron mentioned above, but focuses rather slowly. That may be an issue for you.

The 70-200 non-IS is just that non-IS. You'll need IS at 200mm.

The 70-300 USM has a nano-USM motor. The AF on this lens is lightning quick (Dustin Abbott). I use the 18-135 USM (same motor design), and it is every bit as quick to focus as my 70-200 f/4L IS. This lens is in your budget, is optically superior to the Tamron and the STM in your list, and 50% longer than the non-IS 70-200 you mention. Seems pretty clear to me!


Tom,
Film gear: Elan 7NE / Elan 7 / EOS T2
Yashica FX-D (x2) / 50mm ML f/2 / Sigma Zoom-gamma II 21-35mm f/3.4.2 / Yashica ML 28-85mm f/3.5-4.5 / Tokina 70-210mm ML f/4.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
9,360 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1179
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Post edited 6 months ago by joeseph.
     
Nov 06, 2017 02:36 |  #5

welshwizard1971 wrote in post #18489417 (external link)
No IS makes no difference if you're indoors, it's main benefit is it stabilizes camera movement from where you're holding it, and I assume you don't shake any more indoors than out? It makes no difference to the movement of your target. That said, the 70-200 from canon is a cracking lens, and can take a teleconverter, certainly a x1.4 no problem.

Wiki is your friend....

https://en.wikipedia.o​rg/wiki/Image_stabiliz​ation (external link)

I'd have said indoors would have lower light levels, making IS more useful as shutter speeds would likely be slower...
Realisticly, the only time where IS does not help for handheld shots, is where the subject moves, or when the shutterspeed is very high.

Having said that, the 70-200mm f/4 is a good lens...


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", 1D MK II converted for IR, and now an M5
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,417 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Nov 06, 2017 08:42 |  #6

joeseph wrote in post #18489693 (external link)
I'd have said indoors would have lower light levels, making IS more useful as shutter speeds would likely be slower...
Realisticly, the only time where IS does not help for handheld shots, is where the subject moves, or when the shutterspeed is very high.

Having said that, the 70-200mm f/4 is a good lens...

I guess it depends a lot on what the OP means by “events” for the kids. Unless it’s band or drama where there is not a lot of movement, something with a larger aperture is going to be more helpful than IS.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,681 posts
Gallery: 1085 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 7983
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 06, 2017 08:47 |  #7

Overall cost, the 55-250 STM is really good and actually sharp wide open (F5.6), and it's pretty fast to focus and silent. Great lens. It would be totally fine for outdoor events and sports.

Indoors, I wouldn't fool with any of these F5.6 lenses and would have something faster for indoors (not sure what you need a telephoto for indoor, maybe school plays or graduations or something?).

Indoor, on a serious budget, maybe look at a Yongnuo 100mm F2 (under $200 on Amazon).

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
micco
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
32 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2013
     
Nov 06, 2017 08:57 |  #8

Hi All, thanks for the input so far.

Yes i should have clarified my "indoors" - by this it will be things like indoor soccer, gymnastics, and photos taken from a distance (parents seating area).
My existing XSi has a max ISO of 1600, which the 80D surpasses; so i don't mind getting some grain and capturing the moment vs not at all.

My concern with the lack of IS on the L, was at max 200 in those non-ideal light moments, i suspect IS would come in handy.

I'll take another look at the new canon 70-300 IS II - however it's 550$ right now on sale.
I'm surprised someone said the tammy isn't worth 300, it has good reviews and is priced at the same point new as to the canon...would be nice if someone with it can chime in.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,681 posts
Gallery: 1085 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 7983
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited 6 months ago by MalVeauX.
     
Nov 06, 2017 09:20 |  #9

Indoor soccer and gymnastics will not get much benefit from IS because you're going to have to shoot at a fast shutter to freeze motion anyways. Typical indoor sports values are commonly around 1/640s to 1/1000s shutterspeed to stop explosive action, F2.8, ISo 12,800. A slow F5.6 zoom simply don't do it. And F4 glass will struggle there too. For this, a fast prime is ideal on a budget (F1.8 or F2, like the 85mm and 100mm primes, they are inexpensive, sharp and very fast AF).

Any of the budget long 200~300mm zooms will do the job for you outdoors. The 70-200 F4, I wouldn't even bother with, these newer zooms are actually better (55-250 STM) and the difference between F4 and F5.6 outdoor is not a big deal with a modern body like the 80D.

Your main challenge is going to be the indoor sports stuff. You'll need a 2nd lens for this. F2.8 or faster minimum. So again, look to the 85 F1.8 or 100 F2, used.

In fact, look for all of these used to get the most for your money. They're commonly traded.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,417 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Nov 06, 2017 09:35 |  #10

MalVeauX wrote in post #18489826 (external link)
Indoor soccer and gymnastics will not get much benefit from IS because you're going to have to shoot at a fast shutter to freeze motion anyways. Typical indoor sports values are commonly around 1/640s to 1/1000s shutterspeed to stop explosive action, F2.8, ISo 12,800. A slow F5.6 zoom simply don't do it. And F4 glass will struggle there too. For this, a fast prime is ideal on a budget (F1.8 or F2, like the 85mm and 100mm primes, they are inexpensive, sharp and very fast AF).

Any of the budget long 200~300mm zooms will do the job for you outdoors. The 70-200 F4, I wouldn't even bother with, these newer zooms are actually better (55-250 STM) and the difference between F4 and F5.6 outdoor is not a big deal with a modern body like the 80D.

Your main challenge is going to be the indoor sports stuff. You'll need a 2nd lens for this. F2.8 or faster minimum. So again, look to the 85 F1.8 or 100 F2, used.

In fact, look for all of these used to get the most for your money. They're commonly traded.

Very best,

Yes if you want indoor sports then exactly what Malv said. Look at primes like he mentioned also the 135/2 L and 200/2.8 II L. A 70-200/2.8 like the Non IS L or the Tamron G2 would also be good but these are all stepping up the budget sizably


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
Goldmember
2,088 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 06, 2017 09:50 |  #11

I have the 70-200F4L and the first time I used it, the results brought a smile to my face. The lens is very sharp. However, I generally use it outside, where light levels allow high shutter speeds. Inside, the lens needs flash. This is not a lens that I would choose for use indoors, unless I knew that light levels were going to be high enough.
I would go with the 85F1.8 for indoor sports, if the focal length will work for you. AF is very fast and accurate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,231 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3514
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
Post edited 6 months ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 06, 2017 10:01 |  #12

artyH wrote in post #18489849 (external link)
I have the 70-200F4L and the first time I used it, the results brought a smile to my face. The lens is very sharp. However, I generally use it outside, where light levels allow high shutter speeds. Inside, the lens needs flash. This is not a lens that I would choose for use indoors, unless I knew that light levels were going to be high enough.
I would go with the 85F1.8 for indoor sports, if the focal length will work for you. AF is very fast and accurate.

That isn't an issue of the lens, that is the issue of the body. If the f4L lens doesn't AF well in whatever light is available, it isn't the fault of the lens.

If video is a goal as well, the only lens in that list that will work well for video not picking up the AF noises is the 55-250 STM. Most likely too, you will want IS for video, especially for a longer lens.


Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,417 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 336
Joined Sep 2011
     
Nov 06, 2017 10:53 |  #13

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18489856 (external link)
If video is a goal as well, the only lens in that list that will work well for video not picking up the AF noises is the 55-250 STM. Most likely too, you will want IS for video, especially for a longer lens.

The new nano USM motor in the new 70-300 puts that into play as well although with both of those and pretty much every single STM or nano USM lens available for Canon for quiet video focusing also has a slow as molasses 5.6 aperture.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,231 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3514
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Nov 06, 2017 11:31 |  #14

There is 50 1.8 STM (and the pancake 40), but not really appropriate for this topic. :)


Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,148 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2012
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 06, 2017 11:44 |  #15

micco wrote in post #18489815 (external link)
Hi All, thanks for the input so far.

Yes i should have clarified my "indoors" - by this it will be things like indoor soccer, gymnastics, and photos taken from a distance (parents seating area).
My existing XSi has a max ISO of 1600, which the 80D surpasses; so i don't mind getting some grain and capturing the moment vs not at all.

My concern with the lack of IS on the L, was at max 200 in those non-ideal light moments, i suspect IS would come in handy..

IS helps with YOU shaking... It helps 'freeze' lens and camera induced motion.
IS cannot help when the subjects are moving quickly and lower light (indoors) prevents the freezing of subject motion.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,949 views & 2 likes for this thread
Telephoto Lens input - guide me...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Shutterone1
740 guests, 285 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.