Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 07 Nov 2017 (Tuesday) 12:45
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 16-35 F2.8 refurbish or F4 New

 
jimmyt
Senior Member
706 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Nov 07, 2017 12:45 |  #1

Canon current on sale 16-35 f2.8 refurbish for $950, also I look at 16-35 F4 new about the same price with F2.8 use.
Please give me some advice which one is a good deal.
Thanks


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
yellowt2
Member
189 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Nov 07, 2017 13:06 |  #2

I would say get a refurb 16-35 f/4 for even less :)

It depends on what's important to you; do you need f/2.8? If so then the answer is obvious.
If not then the f/4 is sharper, a little cheaper, a little lighter, and has IS for a low-light hand-holding advantage.

Can you tell that I love my 16-35 f/4L IS?




LOG IN TO REPLY
shocolite
Member
shocolite's Avatar
Joined Mar 2014
Ireland (when I do get home!)
Nov 07, 2017 13:30 |  #3

Always found that the f2.8 lenses are too heavy......

Saying that, I received my new 16-35 f4 today, and really liking it. Excuse my ignorance with US prices, but the 16-35 f2.8 refurbished is the version II?

Guess it is down to whether you want the f2.8 aperture or the trade-off for IS.

It largely depends on the the type of photography you shoot. If pro, then probably the f2.8, otherwise the F4!

Guess it's time to update my signature.......


Canon 80D & 700D; EF-S 10-18/18-55/18-135 STM, EF-S 18-135 IS USM, 50 F1.4, 100 F2.8L Macro, 17-40 F4L, 70-200 F4L IS; 100-400 L II, Speedlite 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Nov 07, 2017 13:47 |  #4

Neither.

Look for a refurb 16-35 F4. You can pick one up for under $800. I wouldn't get the F2.8 unless you absolutely need to go faster than F4.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Nov 07, 2017 14:28 |  #5

jimmyt wrote in post #18490952 (external link)
Canon current on sale 16-35 f2.8 refurbish for $950, also I look at 16-35 F4 new about the same price with F2.8 use.
Please give me some advice which one is a good deal.
Thanks

You either have a very specific reason to shoot at F2.8 at this focal length, or you don't. So if you don't have a very specific reason and need that F2.8, then you don't need the F2.8 lens at all.

Refurb 16-35 F4L IS is a much better buy and much better lens with great image stabilization and modern micro-contrast.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
umphotography's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Gig Harbor, Washington
Nov 07, 2017 16:51 |  #6

As an owner of a 1Dx2 I would get the 16-34 F4 IS in a heartbeat

The IS capabilities of this 16-35 F4 are amazing. Your talking 1/15 -1/10 with a flash and you freeze motion. Its going to nullify anything the F/2.8 can do.......on top of that....Your often at F/3.2-3.5 with 2 people anyway

makes more sense to have an updated sensor and use F/4 glass now in my humble opinion and use fast glass when you need the Bokeh


Mike
www.umphotography.comexternal link
GEAR LIST
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
P4ulG
Senior Member
519 posts
Joined May 2010
Norfolk UK
Nov 07, 2017 16:57 |  #7

The only reason to get a f2.8 would be if your cameras focus depended on being critical at F2.8 otherwise go with the f4. It's a really good sharp lens and works well at f4


Canon 6D Canon 600D Canon M Canons 24-105mm L 70-300mm L. 100mm F2.8 macro L IS. nifty fifty. 22mm macro, 55-250mm IS. Siggys 12-24mm 28-70mmf2.8 120-400mm Speedlights Siggy DG530 super Canon EX430II Vivitar 3700

LOG IN TO REPLY
tcphoto1
Senior Member
tcphoto1's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
Madison, Ga
Nov 07, 2017 18:15 |  #8

I was in the same position but found a clean 24/1.4II. Otherwise, I would have waited for a 16-35/4.


www.tonyclarkphoto.comexternal link
www.tcphoto.orgexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Nick5's Avatar
2,903 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Philadelphia Suburbs
Nov 07, 2017 20:01 |  #9

Jimmy.
No brainer for me.
16-35 f/4 L IS NEW.
Hand held at 1/10" razor sharp.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon Pixma PRO-10 Printer

LOG IN TO REPLY
notastockpikr
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Canada
Nov 08, 2017 07:10 |  #10

A hew 16-35 IS.....hands down. The 16-35 II is now an old lens. Resale in a year maybe $750 if you can find a buyer.




LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
7,452 posts
Joined May 2003
Southeast Pennsylvania
Post has been last edited 11 days ago by John from PA. 2 edits done in total.
Nov 08, 2017 07:38 |  #11

shocolite wrote in post #18490995 (external link)
Excuse my ignorance with US prices, but the 16-35 f2.8 refurbished is the version II?

https://shop.usa.canon​.com ...mm-f4l-is-usm-refurbished (external link) is US$880 but currently shown as out of stock.

https://shop.usa.canon​.com ...-f-28l-ii-usm-refurbished (external link) is US$1080 after a $200 discount.

As a point of comparison the III version is https://shop.usa.canon​.com ...-f28l-iii-usm-refurbished (external link) and is US$1759. Yikes!

Those are Canon refurb prices. Other prices of course may exist.




LOG IN TO REPLY
f8andBeThere
Member
f8andBeThere's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
Memphis
Nov 08, 2017 11:58 |  #12

I own a 16-35 f2.8 II that has many, many miles on it. I love its range of views, but I've grown tired of the lack of sharpness at the edges, and in particular for some reason, on the right side. It probably needs to be worked on.
I found a 16-35 f4 IS on Canon's refurb site for under $800, as others have noted, and grabbed it about two weeks ago. What a sweet lens for a decent price! Sharp edge-to-edge and the rendition of colors seems better, too. Will I miss being able to open it to 2.8? Not likely. I'll hang on to the old lens since I can't get much for it used. May join Canon CPS and ship it in for a checkup.


5D Mark IV, 5D Mark III, 6D, 7D, 40D, 16-35mm f2.8 II, 16-35mm f4 IS, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 24-105mm f4 IS, 50mm f1.4, 85mm f1.8, 135mm f2, 70-200mm f2.8 IS, Sigma 15mm f2.8 fisheye, Sigma 35mm f1.4A, 430 EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Nov 08, 2017 12:11 |  #13

The 16-35 F4 is a fairly common lens on the used/refurb market. Just have patience and you'll pick one up well south of $800.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
PJJ205
Member
185 posts
Joined Aug 2015
Nov 09, 2017 00:50 |  #14

I own the 100-400 IS II, 70-200 IS II, 300 2.8 IS, 135 F2, 24-70 2.8 II, 50 1.8, 16-35 F4, and a Sigma 15 2.8. The 16-35 F4 is my favorite of the bunch... Get one! I assure you that you will not regret it.




LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
joeseph's Avatar
Joined Jan 2004
Auckland, New Zealand
Post has been edited 10 days ago by joeseph.
Nov 09, 2017 02:04 |  #15

I bought my 16-35mm f/2.8 a while ago specifically for a trip to a particular museum...

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

at the time there wasn't an option for IS. If there had, I may have made a different choice.

some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", 1D MK II converted for IR, and now an M5
TF posting: here :-)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,389 views & 3 likes for this thread
Canon 16-35 F2.8 refurbish or F4 New
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00154 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.16s
Latest registered member is comayjo
978 guests, 488 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016