Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting
Thread started 12 Nov 2017 (Sunday) 13:36
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Got the Rotolight Neo 2 and can test against AD200 and Xplor600..anything you want to see?

 
dpe
Member
171 posts
Joined Jan 2017
Wareham
Nov 13, 2017 10:46 as a reply to post 18495399 |  #16

Latest JL video demonstrating it is shot in a graveyard at night, think that proves what it is good for :-P




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LGabrielPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2017
Nov 13, 2017 10:59 |  #17

dpe wrote in post #18495413 (external link)
Latest JL video demonstrating it is shot in a graveyard at night, think that proves what it is good for :-P

hahahah yep that is all he does these days, night shots :D




LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
18,526 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Post has been edited 29 days ago by bobbyz.
Nov 13, 2017 12:04 |  #18

Thanks. This is what I thought. Man, I liked his old videos where he was showing nice 12x12 scrim jim etc. Then when he lied to the ranger in SF bay area shooting a local model, I didn't like it all. That was totally wrong. Why put that part of the video on youtube. Now if I shoot same place and even though I am just a hobbyist, ranger going to ask me for permit. And then this pushing Neo2 knowing well inside that light is not powerful enough. I am not saying light is not good for when you just need a little bit of light but talks like HSS, shooting in the sun, come on.


5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 90mm f2, 50-140mm f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
RDKirk's Avatar
12,549 posts
Joined May 2004
USA
Nov 15, 2017 14:19 |  #19

I would point out too that the >1ft square surface area of the Rotolight is not particularly "diffused" at all, except at macro distances. So if it's not bright enough to send though a scrim or bounce off an umbrella, it's again nowhere touching the capability of a good powerful flash.




LOG IN TO REPLY
LGabrielPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2017
Post has been edited 17 days ago by LGabrielPhoto.
Nov 24, 2017 23:08 |  #20

Second Test results:
I decided to try another test this time using the Godox V860II (the adorama rebranded one) vs the Neo 2.
Since the usual comment from the Rotolight rep when someone asks about the Neo 2 power vs a speedlight is that you need to diffuse the other flashes and lose a lot of power vs the Neo 2...I decided to put those claims to test.
To give the Neo2 all the advantage I decided to not use any modifiders with the Neo 2.
For the Godox I used a Mola Setti (White) in 3 configurations: with the mesh and the opal stack, adding the sock diffuser to those and finally without the sock diffuser but placing a solid metal beauty dish plate from my 56" Fotodiox beauty dish so that it was mesh+opal+fotodiox plate.

Settings were as before with light meter at 6', 1/50, ISO 100. The Godox was set to 24mm. The Neo 2 was set to its brightest temp 4110 and MAX+ as it was AC powered.

Neo 2 Results:
Once again it got F/1.6 at Max+ flash power at 1/50 (changes to 1/100?)
At MAX Constant light it did F/1.0

Godox Results:
Mesh+Opal: F/5.6
Mesh+Opal+Sock diffuser: F/5.0
Mesh+Opal+Fotodiox Metal plate: F/4.5

So much for the claims that because of all the diffusers needed to make the speedlight soft, the power differences were not as big as some may think. And to clarify, I personally would still use a diffuser with the Neo2 for softness but as you can see, even without one it is extremely weak.
If this was Mythbusters I would end with a...."BUSTED!"

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
nixland
Senior Member
451 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Nov 26, 2017 00:48 |  #21

Can they be sued for false advertising? :)




LOG IN TO REPLY
LGabrielPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2017
Nov 26, 2017 08:36 |  #22

nixland wrote in post #18504204 (external link)
Can they be sued for false advertising? :)

ha I wish. :D
I am working on doing a video of the test. Lets see what they have to say about the test. I think I gave it every advantage and still failed. I need to do one under HSS too and see if things look better for it outdoors.




LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
18,526 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Nov 26, 2017 11:20 |  #23

I really wish that other guy, Robert Hall Photography did more testing and put the results out.


5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 90mm f2, 50-140mm f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
dpe
Member
171 posts
Joined Jan 2017
Wareham
Nov 26, 2017 12:21 |  #24

bobbyz wrote in post #18504419 (external link)
I really wish that other guy, Robert Hall Photography did more testing and put the results out.


He was promised one a long time ago to do a proper test after he had done a brochure review (probably to keep him quiet) as far as I know he is amongst a large group of reviewers this has happened to and they are all still waiting - read into that what you will

Mike




LOG IN TO REPLY
Lotto
Goldmember
Lotto's Avatar
2,558 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Southern California
Nov 26, 2017 15:01 |  #25

He removed that 'offensive' video from his channel already..


5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox

LOG IN TO REPLY
LGabrielPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2017
Nov 26, 2017 15:02 |  #26

dpe wrote in post #18504446 (external link)
He was promised one a long time ago to do a proper test after he had done a brochure review (probably to keep him quiet) as far as I know he is amongst a large group of reviewers this has happened to and they are all still waiting - read into that what you will

Mike

They ghosted him after offering to send a sample to review. After doing my tests, I can clearly see why.




LOG IN TO REPLY
LGabrielPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2017
Nov 27, 2017 22:15 as a reply to post 18495399 |  #27

I updated the OP with this link to the video I just uploaded with the test:
https://youtu.be/vzHJ0​Ag5W9M (external link)

I will add another small video with HSS but I did the test with the Speedlight using the Mola Setti with mesh+opal and settings at 1/4000 ISO 100 and it the Godox required 1/4 to match the exposure of the Neo 2 at full power with the AC Adapter.




LOG IN TO REPLY
LGabrielPhoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Oct 2017
Post has been edited 12 days ago by LGabrielPhoto.
Nov 29, 2017 19:53 |  #28

I did a quick test (not on this video ) with HSS:

Godox at full power with the Mola Setti using mesh+opal = F/1.4 Shutter speed 1/2500 ISO 100
Neo 2 with no diffuser, temp 4110 for max output and with AC adapter. With Flash it got F/.8 and with 100 constant light .5




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,868 views & 17 likes for this thread
Got the Rotolight Neo 2 and can test against AD200 and Xplor600..anything you want to see?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00104 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Switchgear
870 guests, 471 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017