Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 11 Dec 2017 (Monday) 17:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND ettlz (showing now: ettlz)
Overall Rating5
Overall Image Quality6
Value for Money2.5
Bokeh7
Sharpness5
Contrast7.5
Focusing2.5
Must Have2
Suitability to Intended Use2
Got What I Expected2
image
photo by lander
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM, reviewed by ettlz

 
ettlz
Member
247 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2007
Post edited 4 months ago by ettlz. (25 edits in all)
     
Dec 11, 2017 17:13 |  #1

In principle this should be a very nice lens. Correctly focused it produces sharp images with pleasant colours and contrast.

Unfortunately the one I got suffers from enough RSA to shift the focus noticeably backwards, even on distant subjects, between about 35mm and 60mm, for apertures f/5.6 to f/9. (Beyond this the DoF becomes big enough to absorb the shift, but diffraction starts to kill any gains.) This is in contrast to some reviewers who found the problem only exists at the 70mm end for close subjects. In mine the shift is enough to take the 'edge' off the images, and much better results are achieved manually focusing with Live View and holding the DoF preview button.

This is a very awkward way to focus.

For those of you wondering what this looks like, the triptych of 100% crops below was shot with this lens at 47mm, at a subject probably around 40m away (certainly not near, anyway). All were processed in DPP with the same recipe. The focus was on the window frame.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

  • A was focused manually and shot at f/4. Note the sharp definition around the window frame and flowerbed.
  • B was taken with the focus dial untouched from A, now with aperture f/8. Note the softening of the window frame and the green foliage in the flowerbed before it. (A cheap kit-lens should be more than capable of this grade.)
  • C was shot at f/8 by manually focusing in Live View, holding down the DoF Preview button. Subject is tack-sharp again.

I'm not aware of any fix for this. It can be worked around somewhat by focusing at 70mm and then zooming back out. Again --- Canon are you listening? --- a very awkward and tedious way to focus a premium autofocus lens. But as far as I'm aware this is a shortcoming of the design. Canon's own service has offered no solution. It could conceivably be fixed with a firmware update for the lens's microcontroller, by hooking into whatever routine that sets the diaphragm with instructions to also move the AF motor closer by a few steps.

The macro mode sort-of works if you're in a desperate situation, but it's very far from being a substitute for a real macro lens.

So in all a disappointing lens. My copy is capable of great results, but is marred by an optical flaw that hampers the usefulness of autofocus over a subset of its parameter space. On the plus side it is one of the few zooms I've bought that has shown acceptable optical alignment out of the box, and that's the only reason I'm holding on to it. But overall I can't really recommend it.

Canon EOS 60D :: Canon EOS 7D :: Canon EOS 10 :: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM :: Manual-focus Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM :: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

704 views & 1 like for this thread
Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM, reviewed by ettlz
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is benbodey
813 guests, 417 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.