Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands
Thread started 13 Jan 2018 (Saturday) 10:46
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

DSLR to confused

 
MrWho
Goldmember
1,162 posts
Joined Aug 2009
North of Baltimore, MD
Post has been last edited 8 days ago by MrWho. 2 edits done in total.
Jan 13, 2018 10:46 |  #1

After a series of unfortunate events, I've been more or less forced to ditch the my 60D. I have an entire system built around it, but it's now too heavy and cumbersome to be carrying around like I once did. This started hours of research on where to go. The downside is that I can't get any hands on a camera for a while. Hopefully my reasoning can help get me going in the right direction.

MFT: I really like the size and weight, but the aspect ratio and crop factor bother me. 300mm is still 300mm at the end of the day, there's no magical magnification turning it into a 600mm lens. Also I've read that high ISO is slightly worse than my 60D. Images also lack the contrast and depth of APS-C. Premium build quality that I loved a few months ago.

Fuji: Excellent image quality, but no IBIS and no weather sealing until the X-T2. Not sure if the RAW issues are solved yet. Lenses are a bit pricey, but excellent after sale support and are very good. I learned photography on a Fuji compact, so I am a fan of theirs.

Sony: Very good IQ, but the crop sensor line looks to be on borrowed time. Battery life issues and menus are confusing. Sony seems to be pushing FE, and that does not solve the size and weight issue. Flat shutter release causes ergonomic issues. Everything else is really, really good.

Canon/Nikon: Home. Compact DSLRs are about the same size as the high end mirrorless offerings as well as similar in weight. Build quality is worryingly bad, even up to the prosumer models. Materials have started to feel continuously cheaper. Still no 100% viewfinder on lightweight models. Issues with video recording compared to lots of other cameras out there. Makes up for everything with good color science, excellent customer service, large lens selection, better grips, battery grips, and superb battery life.

I'd love to hear some opinions before I head into the local pro shop and talk to their people about it when I'm finally physically able to. Or feel free to tell me I've gone mad and to stop being so analytical :lol:.

Side note: I do read all replies and am thankful for them.


Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Owain ­ Shaw
Some of my best friends are people.
Owain Shaw's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
Valencia, Spain.
Post has been last edited 8 days ago by Owain Shaw. 2 edits done in total.
Jan 13, 2018 11:51 |  #2

Hey,

Firstly, sorry to hear about your unfortunate turn of events. At least gear research is good for taking ones mind off of things, and giving something to look forward to. I hope it can be soon that you're out taking pictures again.

I can't claim to have experience with all of the brands or lines mentioned but I do own a Fuji camera and a couple of lenses. I've got no particular loyalty to them though, and it must be said that over time I have ended up using my DSLR more and the Fuji a lot less, but I did use it almost exclusively for a while.

All this to say that I honestly think they could be a good option for someone really needing to ship some weight from their camera setup. They have a good selection of lightweight, compact lenses native to the X-mount. The (35mm equivalent) 23mm f/2 rather than the f/1.4 for example is a good weight saver. A similar option exists for 50mm equivalent. The crop factor is about the same as your 60D actually. An X-Pro body weighs in at under 500g (kiss me I'm metric?) and their kit lens - which is meant to be a good lens - comes in at just under 200g so we're looking at 700g total. The f/2 primes are about the same weight and that's a basic kit covered. A lightweight telephoto might be where the plan hits a stumbling block but I don't know how important the telephoto end is for you. For ultimate portability the 27mm pancake lens is so small that when mounted the camera still goes in my jacket pocket.

I have always found a lot of what people say about the colour and the detail in the files to be true. I haven't had any raw issues either. The build quality on most of their cameras seems better than consumer DSLRs to me but the X-Pro and X-T are aimed at a prosumer market. It may not have weather sealing but I haven't felt the need to protect my X-Pro too much ... and if I did then it's so easy to stash away being nice and small. It is an older body now though, the X-Pro1 that I have, and it does show. I haven't looked at their newer bodies (if I'm not looking to buy I try not to look too much at what's out there) but a lot of users seem very happy.

Honestly, I think they're a good option. Others with more experience of other systems may be able to provide similar testimony though. Best of luck.


| Photographic for the People - New website coming soon. |
| Gear | Flickr (external link) |

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Jan 13, 2018 12:57 |  #3

The X-Pro2 has weather sealing, as do some of their new lenses. I'm currently looking at that camera now as a lightweight alternative to my 5D2.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ShutterKlick
Member
ShutterKlick's Avatar
Joined Oct 2017
Jan 13, 2018 18:48 |  #4

Lumix G3, older camera but still a good shooter. Very small and light weight, and affordabe. I cant think of anything else off the top of my head..

Andrew


"Camera rich, Cash poor"
http://shutterklick.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
15,218 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Joined Jan 2007
Detroit, MI
Jan 13, 2018 19:31 |  #5

For your stated interests, I would focus on the Fuji system vs. micro 4:3.

Fuji - more money, better performance, a bit bigger and heavier.

Micro 4:3 - Really hits most of your wants, is the IQ good enough?

I agree on your other assessments. Sony is clearly headed upscale and FF, they want to sell the A7/A9 and FF glass. And yup, the compact dSLRs are almost as small as the Fuji gear, but the Fuji gear is nicer than the low end dSLR stuff.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII

LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Cream of the Crop
kf095's Avatar
Joined Dec 2009
Canada, Ontario, Milton
Jan 13, 2018 19:41 |  #6

I could hardly see quality in Sony and Fuji offerings, not just Canonikon DSLRs. In terms of "build quality". This is one of the reasons why people are overpaying for Leica brand.
Sometimes it seems to be the only reason...
https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com ...rless_digital_camer​a.html (external link)
"Minimal, unibody design is built from a single, solid piece of aluminum alloy that has been assembled and polished by hand in Germany."


Old Site (external link). M-E and ME blog (external link). Film Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Senior Member
Pippan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2015
Darwin, Straya
Jan 13, 2018 19:55 |  #7

MrWho wrote in post #18540086 (external link)
... I've been more or less forced to ditch the my 60D. I have an entire system built around it, but it's now too heavy and cumbersome to be carrying around like I once did.

If it were me I'd get an EOS SL-1 (actually I have one) and use my existing system with it. SL-1 is only 14 oz inc. battery and card, good IQ, OVF and touch screen. Or EOS SL-2, 16 oz, very good IQ, OVF, tilty-flippy touchscreen. 24 mm and 40 mm pancakes are 4.4 and 4.6 oz respectively, 10-18 mm STM is 8.5 oz, 55-250 mm STM is 13.2 oz. Pretty light system.




LOG IN TO REPLY
MrWho
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,162 posts
Joined Aug 2009
North of Baltimore, MD
Jan 14, 2018 08:39 |  #8

Thank you for the replies! I'll be checking out all the models mentioned, it's good to read so many positives.


Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Two ­ Hot ­ Shoes
Goldmember
Two Hot Shoes's Avatar
Joined Apr 2014
Ireland
Jan 15, 2018 04:30 |  #9

If you want a light weight camera Fuji's X-T20 only weighs 383g including card and battery, that's about 1/2 the weight of your 60D. Same sensor and brain as the X-T2 but not weather sealed and a smaller viewfinder.

But you should also consider the weight of the lenses you need as Fuji's are often made out of metal so can add a little weight. Having said that the 35 f/2 lens is only 170 g where as their 16mm f/1.4 is 375g. You can have a light kit if you want it, the F/2 lenses are quite light and all but the 18mm are weather resistant. The 27mm f/2.8 is only 78g. Hope you get to go out shooting soon.


Fuji: X-PRO2, X-T1, X-E2 | 16/1.4, 18/2, 23/1.4, 35/1.4, 56/1.2, 90/2, 16-55/2.8, 10-24/4. AD600BM, TT865F, AL-H198, ThinkTank AS2, Peli1514, Ona Bowery, Matthews Grip
flickr (external link)Instagram (external link)Blog (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

314 views & 10 likes for this thread
DSLR to confused
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00085 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Pure Photo N.I
811 guests, 300 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017