Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 02 Dec 2017 (Saturday) 02:34
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Maybe finally? EF 135L f/2L IS USM coming in 2018

 
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
PineBomb's Avatar
Joined Apr 2014
On my way to Austin, Texas
Dec 28, 2017 19:32 |  #31

conraderb wrote in post #18511895 (external link)
Not to put down any rumors, but anyone who has real information on this has probably signed a pile of NDAs (nondisclosure agreements).

Rock solid leaks (not to say that this is or is not one) are usually at the direction of the firm itself. IOW NDA is irrelevant.


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link) | street portrait project on instagram (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Ah-keong
Senior Member
Ah-keong's Avatar
Joined Apr 2016
Dec 28, 2017 19:33 |  #32

Charlie wrote in post #18527978 (external link)
ignorance is bliss :lol:

Considering that the sigma 135 is one of the sharpest lenses on the market, it makes the L seem real old. The L aint bad, but the sigma is clearly in a different league. The sigma wide open @ 1.8 feels like the Canon @ f4, it's an incredible optic, and in that sense, I find it a great value. It's a bonafide super optic.

to a large extent I agree that the L is old. For portraits purposes, I prefer the not so sharp Canon 135mm L compared to the very sharp Sigma 135mm Art.

If I am the product manager, I would the update the 135mm L design similar to the 85mm f/1,4 IS USM.

maybe "EF 135mm f/1,8L IS USM"

 :p


Canon 7D Mark II | BG-E16 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm | Sigma DC 18-35mm ART | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II
Canon Speedlite 430EX III-RT |
Olympus E-PL3 | M.Zuiko ED 7-14mm PRO
Manfrotto BeFree Travel Tripod |

LOG IN TO REPLY
agv8or
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
agv8or's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
Midwest
Dec 28, 2017 19:37 |  #33

Charlie wrote in post #18528251 (external link)
no, but charts give you a good idea on performance.

TDP has photos on their site

photozone has photos on their site, and here's their review: In our review of the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 HSM DG ART we were pretty much stunned by its quality. However, the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 HSM DG ART tops that. Those who have followed us over the years know that we don't easily come up with superlatives but this time it's hard to avoid them really. The Sigma lens is the best lens that we have tested so far. The resolution figures are outlandishly good -plus low CAs, very low distortions and comparatively low vignetting. The quality of the bokeh is very close to perfection (for a conventional lens) except for the inevitable cat eye highlights in the image corners. If there is a real weakness it is bokeh fringing at large aperture settings. However, we've rarely seen lenses that can correct them and they were not as fast anyway.
The build quality is top notch and, honestly, we can't really find any downsides here. The used materials are of great quality and weather-sealing helps in situations when the going gets tough. The AF is very fast and near silent.

So how does it compare to granny Canon EF 135mm f/2 USM L? The Canon lens had its time but, at least for now, the 135mm realm is ruled by Sigma. That being said, the Sigma is heavier and a bit more expensive - also because it's a little faster. However, if you are serious about considering your options in this fairly specialized market segment, it is worth going for the very best. Highly recommended!

With all that you've said I "personally" (strictly IMO & subject to change if I had a Sigma lens to compare) don't see any major real world significant improvements, from the comparisons I've seen, that would make ME want to dump my 135L and spend more than $600 difference to do so. If the Sigma 135 Art had OS, as was rumored when it first came to light, I would have jumped the 135L ship in a minute, especially since I don't see it lacking in any qualities that the 135L has.

So I'll continue to wait for the 135L IS.


Rand

Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
DaviSto's Avatar
Joined Nov 2016
Abuja Nigeria
Dec 28, 2017 19:39 |  #34

umphotography wrote in post #18528292 (external link)
Not True with Bryan Carnathan. Best guy on the net. He tells it like it really is

I really like Bryan's site ... he puts in an amazing amount of work.

He is, nevertheless, just one more person engaged in the business of moving product.

As I said elsewhere, somebody is paying for what he does. Hey ... it isn't me, it isn't you. :-)

But he is not independent.


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,143 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Post has been edited 1 month ago by Charlie.
Dec 28, 2017 19:48 |  #35

umphotography wrote in post #18528288 (external link)
Charlie

I have shot both lens side by side. There is no doubt that the Sigma is a bit sharper. It also has a different color and contrast rendering than the 135L.

If I was not a Canon shooter and I did not have a 135L---I would buy the sigma

But I am a canon shooter and the market is FLOODED with 135L which can be consistently purchased for $700.00

There is no way I would spend the extra $$ on the Sigma

Furthermore. I have known Bryan since 2008. If you read further in his review he will tell you that the 135L could probably use an update however, its still a darn fine lens

This is what he actually said so I will copy/paste so you can Re-Read

---------------

" Of course, if Canon made your camera and there is a Canon "L" lens in the comparison mix, that lens is usually an excellent choice – practically a no-brainer. In this case, there is the Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens, a perennial favorite and all-around great-performing lens. As I mentioned earlier, it is more than 20 years older than the Sigma 135 Art Lens and though it is aging very well, it is still an old model.

Looking at the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art Lens vs. Canon 135mm f/2L Lens image quality comparison, we see the Sigma turning in sharper results at f/1.8 than the Canon does at f/2, especially in the periphery of the image circle. While the Canon performs well here, the difference is strong enough to be noticeable. By f/4, the two lenses are more similar in throughout-the-frame sharpness, but the Sigma still holds a slight advantage."

---------------

The Sigma is slightly sharper at F/1.8 than the 135L at F/2.0

Pump up sharpness and clarity and its a mute point

I dont see price a big issue, hence my decision to try out the more expensive lens. Same could be said about when the 24-70ii/70-200ii came along. I'm sure you've face that decision before, it's really the same thing, different flavor. I've owned many standard zooms and they all vary in sharpness with the 24-70ii at the top. Same with the 70-200ii. At some point, you've gotta make that decision whether it's worth it or not. The 135 is my favorite portrait lens, so I put the most money in that. I dont care too much for standard f2.8 zooms, so spend as little as possible on that. It's just a matter of priority. I'de rather shoot the 135 f1.8 over 200 f2, just my preference, I wish there was smaller 200f2 (certainly love the results), but I've yet to find a small version.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
18,616 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Post has been edited 1 month ago by bobbyz.
Jan 01, 2018 19:17 |  #36

I honestly thought that 135mm 1.8 from Sigma had OS. Sigma has been putting out great lenses lately. Even older non Art models if you get one without AF issues were very nice. I remember my Sigma 30mm f1.4 being the sharpest lens I owned and I had 300mm f2.8 IS at the time and almost most canon lenses except the 200mm f2. To me the 135L though very nice sometimes didn't give me results that I was looking for. Maybe it was due to needing higher shutter speed or something else. I found later the 85L to be better. I almost bought 200mm f2 but didn't as I was worried it will be replaced soon and I wanted to see what the Sigma had to offer. Now I have moved to Fuji and happy with them. 56mm f1.2 is nice small lens. And if someone complains oh, that is a crop and blaa blaa blaa, I have a bigger Fuji cropper to bring out, the GFX and the 110mm f2. It might not match f1.2 in aperture but man, look from it is wow so far, or maybe it is just my eyes having paid all those $$$. :)


5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 90mm f2, 50-140mm f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Tom Reichner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Jan 11, 2018 00:29 |  #37

.
Mike,

I see what appears to be some inconsistency in your statements and responses here in this thread. For instance, when Charlie said this:

Charlie wrote in post #18527978 (external link)
Considering that the sigma 135 is one of the sharpest lenses on the market, it makes the L seem real old. The L aint bad, but the sigma is clearly in a different league. The sigma wide open @ 1.8 feels like the Canon @ f4, it's an incredible optic, and in that sense, I find it a great value. It's a bonafide super optic.

Your response was this:

umphotography wrote in post #18528215 (external link)
Where are you buying the stuff you are smoking ?

Seriously, Thats about as far out in left field as I have read lately here at POTN

But then you later said this:

umphotography wrote in post #18528288 (external link)
Charlie

I have shot both lens side by side. There is no doubt that the Sigma is a bit sharper. It also has a different color and contrast rendering than the 135L.

If I was not a Canon shooter and I did not have a 135L---I would buy the sigma

So it is odd to me that you would state that the Sigma is a bit better, yet tell Charlie that his praise of the Sigma is as far out in left field as anything you have read here on POTN lately.

Then when Charlie quotes Bryan Carnathan:

Charlie wrote in post #18528243 (external link)
Bryan Carnathan seems to have a similar opinion:

" . . . the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Lens is a "prime" example. Exceptional image quality, including impressive sharpness and negligible distortion, is right at the top of this lens' advantages. Having the f/1.8 aperture at a telephoto focal length can be a game-changer and there is a special wow factor in the background blur this combination creates.

The 135 Art lens brings more than just great image quality – it is the full package. Great looks, quality design ... perhaps the only missing feature is optical stabilization.

The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Lens is an exceptional portrait photography lens. Even if portraits are not necessarily your thing, this lens may send you seeking portrait opportunities. And, the image quality the 135 Art delivers will cause you to pull it out for any other use you can make 135mm work for. I'm nearly certain that you are going to like this one!"

Your response is:

umphotography wrote in post #18528292 (external link)
Not True with Bryan Carnathan. Best guy on the net. He tells it like it really is

So Bryan Carnathan says that the Sigma is a "game changer", and has "exceptional image quality", and that it has "a special background blur." And you respond by saying that Bryan is the best guy on the net and that he tells it like it is.

Yet when Charlie gave high praise to the Sigma, you told him he was smoking something and that his comments were way out in left field.

I cannot understand the logic and reason behind your statements, because they seem to contradict one another. I mean, it seems that you are contradicting yourself, which, of course, would be illogical for someone to do. It almost seems as though the way you feel about things flip-flops from one moment to the next.

If you could provide some clarity to these apparent contradictions it would help me, and presumably others, to make more sense out of the posts that you have made in this thread.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
umphotography's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Gig Harbor, Washington
Post has been edited 1 month ago by umphotography.
Jan 22, 2018 19:47 |  #38

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18538449 (external link)
.
Mike,

I see what appears to be some inconsistency in your statements and responses here in this thread. For instance, when Charlie said this:

Your response was this:

But then you later said this:

So it is odd to me that you would state that the Sigma is a bit better, yet tell Charlie that his praise of the Sigma is as far out in left field as anything you have read here on POTN lately.

Then when Charlie quotes Bryan Carnathan:

Your response is:

So Bryan Carnathan says that the Sigma is a "game changer", and has "exceptional image quality", and that it has "a special background blur." And you respond by saying that Bryan is the best guy on the net and that he tells it like it is.

Yet when Charlie gave high praise to the Sigma, you told him he was smoking something and that his comments were way out in left field.

I cannot understand the logic and reason behind your statements, because they seem to contradict one another. I mean, it seems that you are contradicting yourself, which, of course, would be illogical for someone to do. It almost seems as though the way you feel about things flip-flops from one moment to the next.

If you could provide some clarity to these apparent contradictions it would help me, and presumably others, to make more sense out of the posts that you have made in this thread.

.


I was referring to his statement of a bonafide super optic and that F/1.8 makes the canon feel/look like F/4....again what pot is he smoking..... not even a remotely accurate statement. The canon and sigma and both dam close with Boken wide open. Sigma is sharper. But how much sharper do you need a portrait lens to be.

If Im a canon shooter im buying a used 135L for $700.00 at anyplace USA before I pop for the Sigma...pretty simple...If I dont have a 135L I might consider the Sigma. Its a great lens. But its not the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ as some would have you believe. There better glass out there. For Example the 200L F/2.0 comes to mind


Mike
www.umphotography.comexternal link
GEAR LIST
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
18,616 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Bay Area, CA
Jan 26, 2018 17:55 |  #39

If Sigma had OS, then yes. I do think that if Sigma does come out with 200mm f2 it will put more pressure on Canon price of the 200mm f2. 200mm f2 is good, not denying it but other companies are also coming out with very good glass. The latest Sigma offerings come to mind. And now being a Fuji user, their lenses are also great. That Fuji 110mm f2 I think is notch above 200mm f2.


5dmk3, 35L, 85L II, 300mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f5.6
Fuji XT-1, 14mm f2.8, 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4, 56mm f1.2, 90mm f2, 50-140mm f2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,518 views & 14 likes for this thread
Maybe finally? EF 135L f/2L IS USM coming in 2018
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00259 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.06s
Latest registered member is realbiel
984 guests, 481 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017