Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers
Thread started 08 Jan 2018 (Monday) 16:43
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Is this monitor any good for photoshop?

 
walkien
Senior Member
785 posts
Joined Sep 2003
West Covina, CA
Jan 08, 2018 16:43 |  #1

I am thinking to get a new monitor soon.


Is this monitor any good? Dell 32" Ultra Wide IPS monitor
https://www.costco.com ...or.product.10038582​4.html (external link)


please advise.


Canon 1D Mark II N, Canon 5D Mark II with grip, Canon 7D II with grip, Canon 10D with grip, broken Canon G2. 28-135 mm IS, 50 mm F1.8 II, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 70-200 f4 L, 85 f1.8, 100 macro 2.8 IS
420 EX/580 EX/580EXII, 2 600 EX-RT, Bogen 3321 tripod
Sekonic L-358 Flash Meter, 2 Alien Bees b800, 60" umbrella, large octogon softboxes LightSphere II, Omnibounce. Tronix Explorer 1200, pocket wizard

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
Jan 09, 2018 05:12 |  #2

I would not want to be using that monitor for image editing, the resolution is just too low for me. The linear resolution is going to be well under 72 PPI. Windows has been designed to run on a 96 PPI display since at least 1995, I'm not even sure if it wasn't a choice for Windows 3.11. These days I would say that my minimums would be 2560×1440 at 27", and for anything larger I would want 4K upwards. I have the UP2715K which is a 5K display at 27", it uses the same panel as the 5K 27" iMac. I would never want to go to a lower resolution now.

Those very large monitors, that only run at 1920×1080 are aimed at gamers. It is large and has a reasonable response time, good for those wanting to play games at that resolution. The fact that it only has VGA and HDMI inputs is also a tell tale, the better quality monitors are more likely to have options such as Display Port.

I would give this, and any other 27" monitor that will only go to 1920×1080 a pass.

Alan


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Jan 09, 2018 08:21 |  #3

walkien wrote in post #18536554 (external link)
I am thinking to get a new monitor soon.


Is this monitor any good? Dell 32" Ultra Wide IPS monitor
https://www.costco.com ...or.product.10038582​4.html (external link)


please advise.

Alan summed up some good reasons to avoid this monitor specifically for editing in photoshop. I agree. You'd want something higher resolution, or something smaller.

I've used a monitor that was 37" but only 1080p and the pixel size is so obvious that you can see them and it's very hard to judge noise, sharpness, subtle transition, etc, things you'd care about in a pixel editor. I went right back down to smaller monitor for editing.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
gjl711's Avatar
53,623 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Deep in the heart of Texas
Jan 09, 2018 08:35 |  #4

It depends on what you currently have, what your expectations are, and how serious you want to get. For $179, it's a fine monitor and will work well. There are better options but very few under $200 that are going to be any better than the one listed.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
sssc
Senior Member
sssc's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Ohio.SW
Jan 15, 2018 04:05 |  #5

I seen that and almost got it then thought about it and started doing some home work.Here you can get some good info on monitors.http://www.tftcentral.​co.uk/ (external link) Happy shopping


Keith- EOS REBEL T2i 18-55,55-250.85 1/8. 100-400L. 10-22 f/3.5-4.5. 24-105mm f/4L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
48,038 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Jan 15, 2018 10:07 |  #6

Get smaller, 24 or 27 inch with MUCH higher resolution and IPS.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Choderboy's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
Sydney, Australia
Jan 28, 2018 03:53 |  #7

My ageing Apple Cinema Display is 1920 x 1200. Looks OK, but it's 23 inch.
32 inch with even less vertical pixels, no thanks.


Dave
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/12185187@N00/ (external link)
5D4, 1D4, 1DS2. Canon, Sigma lenses
Image editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,130 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Atlanta, GA
Post has been last edited 22 days ago by davesrose. 2 edits done in total.
Jan 28, 2018 10:33 as a reply to BigAl007's post |  #8

OSs may still have a base DPI like 96 DPI as a factor for scaling (especially now with many monitors having resolutions that require hiDPI scaling). The main format that was designed with a specific DPI was the early Macintosh. Developers decided to make the pixels square (for easy coding graphics), and 72 DPI to scale with the 144 PPI Apple printers. The resolution of the Macintosh system was 512 x 342. Once 3rd party monitors and printers were introduced, the 72 DPI standard was no longer used. Earlier IBM systems had much lower resolutions and DPIs (especially in the vertical row lines): VGA would be a standard that would be comparable at a resolution of 640 x 480 (which would be 62 DPI on a 13" monitor of the era). IBM would introduce the 8514 standard that had 1024 x 768 resolution for a 120 DPI on the average display size of the time.

I'll also mirror other posters that for photography, a high DPI monitor is a good feature now. Only main thing is that newer software and OSes do a better job of scaling fonts for high DPI. Most my programs now scale to the desktop's scaling. Only a few don't, and they are scaled pretty well with Window's 10 "System(Enhanced)" scaling mode.


Canon 5D mk III , 7D mk II
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

628 views & 3 likes for this thread
Is this monitor any good for photoshop?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00153 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Joe at Topaz Labs
882 guests, 317 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017