Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 29 Jan 2018 (Monday) 18:10
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

70-200mm lens for portrait work

 
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,147 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Feb 05, 2018 18:33 |  #16

Wilt wrote in post #18552467 (external link)
http://stepheneastwood​.com .../lensdistortion/ind​ex.htm (external link)

But I do NOT like her photo taken with 230m or 350mm more than I like her photo taken with 100mm or 135mm!

that's subjective.

I do think the 350 looks the best, but then again, that's my opinion ;-)a

I do recall a blind test where FL wasnt mentioned, and consistently, 200 looked better than 135 and 85. And of course there's the model factor, professional models tend to look better with longest FL, but dont look bad with short either.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Wilt's Avatar
39,811 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2005
Belmont, CA
Post has been last edited 19 days ago by Wilt. 3 edits done in total.
Feb 05, 2018 18:40 |  #17

Charlie wrote in post #18557211 (external link)
that's subjective.

I do think the 350 looks the best, but then again, that's my opinion ;-)a

I do recall a blind test where FL wasnt mentioned, and consistently, 200 looked better than 135 and 85. And of course there's the model factor, professional models tend to look better with longest FL, but dont look bad with short either.

Yes it is indeed subjective.
We are not familar with their usual appearance, we only know what looks good to us as individuals.
But the portrait shooting photographer for paying clients needs to remember it is not what WE THINK is a pleasing photo, it is the SUBJECT or the subject's MOTHER who chooses the photo that pleases them!
That is why I find it so perplexing when photographers want razor-thin DOF and I anticipate the subject's reaction is 'why is the photo blurry?'


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
RPCrowe's Avatar
7,687 posts
Joined Nov 2005
San Diego County, California, USA
Post has been last edited 15 days ago by RPCrowe. 2 edits done in total.
Feb 09, 2018 18:38 |  #18

I am very satisfied with the results from my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens on either a full frame camera or a 1.6x crop camera. I don't like the razor thin DOF in which the eyelashes can be in focus with the pupils OOF.

I most often shoot at f/5.6 with focal lengths all over the range from 70mm to 200mm on both full frame and crop cameras, depending on my subject or subjects. Using a longer focal length allows background blur even at f/5.6.

The 70-200mm f/4L IS lens is relatively light weight and fast focusing (which may at times be an advantage). The extra price of this lens vs the non-IS is (IMO) well worth it. An additional plus is that the rounded iris blades provide very smooth and buttery bokeh. The price of this lens (in comparison with other top-line glass) isn't too bad either...

It is my go-to long focal length lens...


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
15,262 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Joined Jan 2007
Detroit, MI
Feb 09, 2018 20:14 |  #19

70-200 is superlative for portrait work. Able to manage full body to head and shoulders with one lens, and typically f/2.8 is plenty fast. Faster than f/2.8 in portraiture is specialty really, as it will leave parts of the subject blurry as well unless the framing is loose and kind of non-typical for portraits.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,138 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Atlanta, GA
Feb 09, 2018 20:42 |  #20

If it's just head and shoulders (to mid torso) in a studio setting, then I'll use my 100mm or 135mm primes. I still use the 70-200mm often, for any outdoor work: be it portraits, sports, or landscapes.


Canon 5D mk III , 7D mk II
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY

1,439 views & 6 likes for this thread
70-200mm lens for portrait work
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00102 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Dastarblazer
772 guests, 305 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017