Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 14 Nov 2017 (Tuesday) 13:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM

 
tim1970
Senior Member
Avatar
580 posts
Gallery: 96 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 318
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 14, 2018 12:07 |  #46

ShotofGod wrote in post #18540516 (external link)
Yes, my doubt stems from this.
So the new model is more performing, better af, faster and more precise, better tropicalization, better weight balance dimensions, stabilizer and 77mm filters.
Many photographers say that despite all these improvements, the 85mm 1.2 II is still hibeable for its performance, returns images with a unique dream effect.
My doubt is whether it is better to have the new technology to the detriment of the dream effect.


It is true that you do get a unique look from this lens. However, if you were to take 10 images shot with the 1.2 and 10 different images shot with the 1.4, it would be very difficult to pick out which shots belong to which lens. If you take the exact same image shot with each lens and compare them side by side, then you probably would be able to pick out the 1.2 image, but only after close examination. So, to me, in real world usage the benefits of the 1.4 far outweigh the "unique look" of the 1.2



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
Avatar
1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 883
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria
     
Jan 14, 2018 14:09 as a reply to  @ tim1970's post |  #47

This is something that I would really like to see tested out. Until someone who has access to both lenses is able to take a range of carefully selected representative side-by-side test shots with each lens set to maximum aperture, I think the special importance of the 'magic' or it's practical insignificance are no more than blind assertions ... whichever side of the argument they come from.


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thenextguy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,486 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 3927
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jan 15, 2018 14:38 |  #48

Does anyone have any problems with this lens not catching autofocus? It will hunt and struggle and then never catch focus. I usually have to turn off my camera and when I turn it on again it usually works.

I'm updating my firmware on my 5Ds R, but I have no idea if it's related to that. Anyone else have similar issues?


Steve -- Website (external link) -- Flickr (external link) -- Tumblr (external link) -- Instagram (external link) -- 500px (external link) (New!)
Canon 5Ds R | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 35 F2 IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
Senior Member
Avatar
580 posts
Gallery: 96 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 318
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 16, 2018 22:51 |  #49

Decided to try this lens at basketball tonight. While it didn't focus as fast as my 70-200, I was still very impressed by the keeper rate, especially considering I was shooting at 1.4.

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4697/38837989475_7b8cfc306c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/22aY​Rbc  (external link) Decatur-108 (external link) by Tim Richardson (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4632/27957640729_af95534d80_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/JAwd​yr  (external link) Decatur-107 (external link) by Tim Richardson (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4672/38838084945_a67787dded_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/22aZ​kye  (external link) Decatur-110 (external link) by Tim Richardson (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4716/25864614268_709ef13ec1_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FpyU​Hj  (external link) Decatur-111 (external link) by Tim Richardson (external link), on Flickr


Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mariosworld343
Goldmember
Avatar
1,201 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Illinois
     
Jan 21, 2018 09:34 |  #50

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4621/24946940317_fdbe7f24e1_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/E1tA​dD  (external link) shadow of light (external link) by Mario Bialek (external link), on Flickr

Canon 5d iv
-17mm tse L, 24-70L II, 35 1.4L II, 85L 1.4, 100L, 70-200L II, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarks
Senior Member
817 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 21, 2018 20:47 |  #51

thenextguy wrote in post #18541570 (external link)
Does anyone have any problems with this lens not catching autofocus? It will hunt and struggle and then never catch focus. I usually have to turn off my camera and when I turn it on again it usually works.

I'm updating my firmware on my 5Ds R, but I have no idea if it's related to that. Anyone else have similar issues?

No such issues with the 5D3 body so far. What is the lighting condition and your camera settings when this happens?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
Senior Member
Avatar
580 posts
Gallery: 96 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 318
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 21, 2018 22:28 |  #52

DaviSto wrote in post #18540773 (external link)
This is something that I would really like to see tested out. Until someone who has access to both lenses is able to take a range of carefully selected representative side-by-side test shots with each lens set to maximum aperture, I think the special importance of the 'magic' or it's practical insignificance are no more than blind assertions ... whichever side of the argument they come from.


Here is a comparison of the 85 1.2, 85 1.4, and the Sigma 85 1.4

https://neilvn.com …non-ef-85mm-f14l-is-lens/ (external link)


I stand by my original statement, that in a blind test, I don't think you could consistently pick out which lens was used.



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
Senior Member
620 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jan 22, 2018 00:48 |  #53

Is this lens worth upgrading from the Sigma 85mm 1.4 non-Art?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mariosworld343
Goldmember
Avatar
1,201 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Illinois
     
Jan 22, 2018 19:39 |  #54

Just some fun snaps...cant wait to use this on engagement sessions

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4620/24976269937_8170c49e93_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/E44U​TK  (external link) holding on (external link) by Mario Bialek (external link), on Flickr

Canon 5d iv
-17mm tse L, 24-70L II, 35 1.4L II, 85L 1.4, 100L, 70-200L II, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dlee13
Goldmember
Avatar
3,022 posts
Gallery: 368 photos
Likes: 1768
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
     
Jan 29, 2018 21:15 |  #55

texshooter wrote in post #18546291 (external link)
Is this lens worth upgrading from the Sigma 85mm 1.4 non-Art?

I have the same lens and I'm a bit undecided about it. Is it mostly static portraits that you shoot?

I was a second shooter at a wedding last weekend and was using the Sigma. I noticed in single shot it has no issue nailing focus, although in continuous it wasn't as accurate. If you shoot in continuous a lot then this lens may be the better option.


Sony Alpha A7III ~ Canon EOS M5 ~ Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 ~ Canon EF 35mm f2 IS
Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS ~ Canon EF 100mm f2.8L IS USM ~
Sigma MC-11 ~ Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 ~ Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art

Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ah-keong
Senior Member
Avatar
525 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 314
Joined Apr 2016
     
Feb 05, 2018 00:46 as a reply to  @ post 18555609 |  #56

May I ask are you using the f/1,4L IS?


Canon 7D Mark II | BG-E16 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm | Sigma DC 18-35mm ART | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II
Canon Speedlite 430EX III-RT |
Olympus E-PL3 | M.Zuiko ED 7-14mm PRO
Manfrotto BeFree Travel Tripod |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gumby1220
Senior Member
Avatar
297 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 278
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston, tx
Post edited 3 months ago by Gumby1220.
     
Feb 05, 2018 07:07 as a reply to  @ Ah-keong's post |  #57

Oh shoot I saw 85mm and usm and assumed and didn’t pay attention to the f stop


6D | T3/1100D | EF 85mm f1.8 USM | EF 50mm f1.8 mkII | EF-S 10-18mm IS STM | EF-S 18-55mm IS II | 600EX-RT | YN-E3-RT | PCB B800 |
flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artsf
Senior Member
287 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 294
Joined Sep 2015
Post edited 3 months ago by artsf.
     
Feb 11, 2018 05:29 |  #58

I rented this lens for a weekend. OMG, love from first shot. The lens is brilliant. I can tell you it is the best L lens I’ve ever used and my beloved 85L 1.2 ii is now for sale. I am a hybrod photo/video shooter and the new 85 is just magical - IS is incredible even for panning and quiet! and DPAF servo tracking (5div) is perfect. Honestly, I can’t take a bad photo with it. It draws just like 85ii, nearly identical look down to nuances in bokeh and vignetting pattern. But it is way better when it comes to purple fringing. It’s still there and even in the same spots (!) but it’s almost unnoticeable now unless you are looking for it. I predict this lens is gonna be a huge blockbuster for Canon including cinematography. I never paid full retail for a lens and especially not 1.5+k but I now ordered one from BH and it’s out of stock backordered. I am a huge fan of 50L and 85L look especially for fine art portraiture and the new lens is just as good, contrary to so reviews saying it’s got ‘clinical’ look similar to 24-70ii. Not in my experience, I am very defensive when it comes to 50L/85L and the new lens retains the majic in rendering and pop colors. I would not say it’s much sharper than 85ii, the difference should more noticeable on 5dsr. Using my 5div, the difference in sharpness is very subtle at 1.2-1.8 and then indistinguishable. I do feel that 1.4 len produce better results from a distance - full outdoor body portraits. It’s consistently sharp unlike 85ii when you need to hunt for magic.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbdinh22
Junior Member
25 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 46
Joined Nov 2017
     
Feb 22, 2018 11:18 |  #59

Is purchasing this lens worth it if I can sell and consolidate both Sigma 85 1.4 Art & Sigma 135 1.8?


Canon 5D IV. 24- 70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, Sigma 135 1.8 Art, Sigma 85 1.4 Art, Tamron 15-30 2.8 VC, Tamron 90 2.8 VC
Los Angels Wedding Photography (external link)
Orange County Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
Avatar
1,256 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 323
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Waconia, MN
     
Feb 22, 2018 12:23 |  #60

IMAGE: http://www.scottbolster.com/potn/20180221-IMG_0768.jpg

www.scottbolster.com (external link)
facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

18,328 views & 172 likes for this thread
Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is thisisntme
749 guests, 334 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.